We can now definitively say this isn't true, just look at Hep. He's our poster childYou guys really do find the strangest things to argue about...you can't change anyone's mind about their belief or religion..not without years of violence anyway...and what it the point? Sweet Jesu...
Yes, an aweful lot of uncertainty would have to be aligned to created a repeatable, non-causal event in the macro world, for example. Or to throw a rock through a boulder. But, it's more than meta-woo that says it is certainly possible. In Many Worlds Hypothisis, there is nothing to suggest a strict timeline causal effect of event forks, as I understand it, meagerly. Though these decisions are said to create these other, many, worlds, there is nothing to say at what point that decision would be injected to make the new world. There is plenty to suggest non-causal effect at the forks. I would say that forking Worlds is a possible maco effect.The thing about Heisenberg's Principle is that it sets a maximum dimension for the uncertainty that is approx. atomic in scale. The quantity h is tiny. Imo extending the Uncertainty Principle into the macroscopic does not work. There are too many metaphysicians out there today (imo) who hide behind an incomplete comprehension of uncertainty and quantum mechanics. cn
Prophecy is basically making a prediction thats guaranteed to come true. The way you described it sounds like a bunch of loonies in a cult. Example of a prophecy would be like I write down today that a specific event will happen usually during a specific time period or place, in a specific order of events. If it doesnt come true its not prophecy. Most people that "think" theyre prophets (i.e. Joseph Smith) are usually making stuff up and convincing themselves it is a message from god. The book of Revelations is a good example of prophecy that is coming true, proving itself to be a legitimate prophetic text.What is prophecy?
Define it
Someday our sun is going to explode. Guess I'm a prophet now.Prophecy is basically making a prediction thats guaranteed to come true. The way you described it sounds like a bunch of loonies in a cult. Example of a prophecy would be like I write down today that a specific event will happen usually during a specific time period or place, in a specific order of events. If it doesnt come true its not prophecy. Most people that "think" theyre prophets (i.e. Joseph Smith) are usually making stuff up and convincing themselves it is a message from god. The book of Revelations is a good example of prophecy that is coming true, proving itself to be a legitimate prophetic text.
Haha.. Seriously though, I feel like that's how CWE views us.Join usssss. cn
Someday our sun is going to explode. Guess I'm a prophet now.
Time to find a 9 year old to marry and maybe I'll start my own religion. Oh wait muporkmed beat me to it.
The probability of an electron tunneling into and out of a "quantum dot" is high enough to measure.Yes, an aweful lot of uncertainty would have to be aligned to created a repeatable, non-causal event in the macro world, for example. Or to throw a rock through a boulder. But, it's more than meta-woo that says it is certainly possible. In Many Worlds Hypothisis, there is nothing to suggest a strict timeline causal effect of event forks, as I understand it, meagerly. Though these decisions are said to create these other, many, worlds, there is nothing to say at what point that decision would be injected to make the new world. There is plenty to suggest non-causal effect at the forks. I would say that forking Worlds is a possible maco effect.
So, true, micro scale, but all existence is piles of these micro particles. That's all there is.
Moebius, I've stripped your argument and found it a mite one-sided.I was referring to accusing me of intentionally posting a link and misrepresenting it because I didnt think it would be clicked.
IMO ... The constant nickpicking equates to trolling.
Haha.. Seriously though, I feel like that's how CWE views us.
Nah, more like this =pHaha.. Seriously though, I feel like that's how CWE views us.
http://www.squidoo.com/templejerusalemLinks?
The Temple Mount is and has been occupied by a Mosque for quite some time. They don't even allow archaeological excavations there let alone rebuild the Temple.
Links again.
Some tumors can spontaneously regress. How do you determine if that was god or a tumor that regressed naturally?
I have seen zero evidence that anyone that has been paralyzed getting up and walking without medical devices. It sounds like you have been taken in by faith healers and revivals where the placebo effect and outright fraud is used. Look up Peter Popoff. Every time people have investigated miraculous healing, the evidence has come up short. I have citations and literature to support this, do you have anything to support your claims?
A simple google search turns up plenty of proof of the paranormal. Not to mention plenty of TV shows on mainstream networks like discovery, history, and natgeo.I have not yet seen a video that withstands challenge. Video and digital photos are not reliable imo.
Actual scientists would use equipment that would meet the authenticity challenge. I don't mean "only official, accredited get to play" when I say scientists, but rather people who understand systematic error and how to contain it. That's one of my markers for science vs. parlor games. cn
A simple google search also tells me that marijuana is a dangerous and physically addictive drug that will cause schizophrenia and mass hysteriaA simple google search turns up plenty of proof of the paranormal. Not to mention plenty of TV shows on mainstream networks like discovery, history, and natgeo.
We have different criteria of proof. cnA simple google search turns up plenty of proof of the paranormal. Not to mention plenty of TV shows on mainstream networks like discovery, history, and natgeo.
I have to give you a rep for actually providing links when requested. Most theists here have danced and dodged when they have made certain claims. The following point was something I was completely unaware. Thank you very much for providing those linkshttp://www.squidoo.com/templejerusalem
http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1643.cfm
http://www.templeinstitute.org/main.htm
http://www.newgateministries.com/jerusalemchronicles/rebuilt-temple.html
http://endtimepilgrim.org/temple.htm
I could go on. And havent you heard of how the freemasons already rebuilt a walkway to the temple to kick off the construction? And as far as the miracles go, I have witnessed first hand a quadrapalegic walk.
As we consider the rebuilding of the Temple there is one more important question that must be addressed. Just where on the Temple Mount will the future Jewish Temple be built? Will the foundations be laid right in the middle of the Temple Mount as many suppose? This would necessitate the removal or destruction of the Dome of the Rock. Of course this would be an earthshaking turn of events.
The Dome is a revered Islamic site.
Will the Dome of the Rock be destroyed?
And is its removal even necessary? Just where did the original temple stand? Was it really in the center as we see in the paintings? Or was it situated to the north of the present location of the Dome of the Rock? Some Jewish authorities on the subject, notably Asher Kaufmann are saying precisely this.
This is very interesting. It opens up the very real possibility that the Third Jewish Temple will be constructed on the north side of the Mount. The small cupola marked "A" is called "the dome of the Spirits". It is said to mark the point of the holy of holies in the former temple.
Could the Temple be rebuilt next to the Islamic Dome of the Rock? Could Israel's future Temple and its worshipers peacefully coexist with the Islamic Dome and their worshipers? This would be very politically favorable to world peace. If such a plan was acted upon then the Temple Mount would look something like what we see in the picture up above.
I've watched many of the mainstream TV shows and none, not a single one has every provided solid evidence for supernatural claims. In fact, many of the debunk the claims they investigate such as in the Paranormal Files.A simple google search turns up plenty of proof of the paranormal. Not to mention plenty of TV shows on mainstream networks like discovery, history, and natgeo.
Way different...We have different criteria of proof. cn
It isn't killing that is wrong it is murder... two different concepts...like the ideas of right and wrong, killing being wrong, all that kinda stuff is all Christian principles. do you think animals feel bad when they kill? fuck no