zimm is telling a move version. when you shoot someone directly through the heart, they don't sit up and say "you got me", as he claims in his written statement and interrogations. in the written statement, he says he shot him "in the torso".
yet in the reenactment, he says he didn't think he shot martin (at point blank range, no less). he says he thought martin just sat up and says something more to the effect of "i get the point, i heard your gun, you got me" and that's why he straddled him.
really?
not to mention his descriptions never coincide with the multiple eyewitness accounts of what happened after the gunshot.
self defense cases rely a lot on whether or not the jury thinks the defender exercised good judgment, according to experts. and you'd be hard pressed to say a guy that straddled a kid he just shot point blank in the heart was using good judgment. not to mention his credibility is hovering around negative four thousand on a scale of 1 to 10.