... and how does one do that?no, im siting reasons, its up to a court to prove malicious intent
thats right the court has to prove that a hate crime was commited, its not a guarantee, innocent till proven guilty for sure, they have to prove it,
Usually by pointing out the nazi face tattoos... and how does one do that?
So if this sorry piece of shit kills a minority for a different reason or by accident, he's going to get prosecuted for a hate crime anyway?Usually by pointing out the nazi face tattoos
Prior web postings of racist intent
police records
maybe eyewitnesses that recall the perp yelling "kill all the niggers starting with this one"
Doesnt mean thatSo if this sorry piece of shit kills a minority for a different reason or by accident, he's going to get prosecuted for a hate crime anyway?
Does this mean that reputation means something? Bucky? Are you listening? What sat you?
Might? Pretty flimsy. Do you enjoy chasing your tail?Doesnt mean that
But I think the facebook posting right before he killed the guy stating
We gonna kill the bruthas
Might show intent
So if this sorry piece of shit kills a minority for a different reason or by accident, he's going to get prosecuted for a hate crime anyway?
Does this mean that reputation means something? Bucky? Are you listening? What sat you?
Chesus?Doesnt mean that
But I think the facebook posting right before he killed the guy stating
We gonna kill the bruthas
Might show intent
What about this? Is this a hate crime?Doesnt mean that
But I think the facebook posting right before he killed the guy stating
We gonna kill the bruthas
Might show intent
YesWhat about this? Is this a hate crime?
[video=youtube_share;yn8CE5ISUSw]http://youtu.be/yn8CE5ISUSw[/video]
if the prosecution has three ways to spin the story then its highly dubious that any are right, at least in this context, right enough to prove a hate crimeIn my ridiculous 3 scene example I gave of different reasons you drove to my house to kill me how should a jury decide the length of your sentence?
are you asking me how a court proves something to be unequivocally right or the truth or correct, i dont think i have enough legal knowledge or knowledge of laws to answer with certianty but some how the courts are still running . . . .... and how does one do that?
Who are "they"?Yes
But unfortunatly
They dont have a category for cops
No is my answer to your first question , yes reputation means something, UB is listening , more than likely, and i cant speak for buck but thats how i feelSo if this sorry piece of shit kills a minority for a different reason or by accident, he's going to get prosecuted for a hate crime anyway?
Does this mean that reputation means something? Bucky? Are you listening? What say you?
He's on record saying "reputation means nothing".No is my answer to your first question , yes reputation means something, UB is listening , more than likely, and i cant speak for buck but thats how i feel
whats your point . . . .this is not the "UB !, Your my not my father" thread.He's on record saying "reputation means nothing".
You just committed a thought crime.whats your point . . . .this is not the "UB !, Your my not my father" thread.
what in any way makes this a possible crimeYou just committed a thought crime.
it wasn't ways to spin a story for the jury, it was three distinctly different acts. I asked if each should be punished according to why they killed me, or should they be equal under the law because each was a pre-meditated vicious murder. I'm thinking you do but I'm hoping you are starting to realize how wrong that is. If not I'm trying to figure out why. I don't understand the Al Sharpton mentality but I would like to.if the prosecution has three ways to spin the story then its highly dubious that any are right, at least in this context, right enough to prove a hate crime