Colorado Massacre, Fishy business

Status
Not open for further replies.

srh88

Well-Known Member
just like how you knew no one died at the pentagon lol
Another study has concluded that people who only watch Fox News are less informed than all other news consumers.
Researchers at Fairleigh Dickinson University updated a study they had conducted in late 2011. That study only sampled respondents from New Jersey, where the university is located. This time, the researchers conducted a nationwide poll.
The poll asked questions about international news (Iran, Egypt, Syria and Greece were included) and domestic affairs (Republican primaries, Congress, unemployment and the Keystone XL pipeline.)
The pollsters found that people were usually able to answer 1.8 out of 4 questions on foreign news, and 1.6 of 5 questions on domestic news, and that people who don't watch any news were able to get 1.22 of the questions on domestic policy right.
As the study explained, though, people who watched only Fox News fared worse:
The largest effect is that of Fox News: all else being equal, someone who watched only Fox News would be expected to answer just 1.04 domestic questions correctly -- a figure which is significantly worse than if they had reported watching no media at all. On the other hand, if they listened only to NPR, they would be expected to answer 1.51 questions correctly; viewers of Sunday morning talk shows fare similarly well. And people watching only "The Daily Show With Jon Stewart" could answer about 1.42 questions correctly.​
Other networks also did badly in some sections; MSNBC viewers and Fox News viewers both fared worse in answering international questions than people who watched no news.
People who only listened to NPR or watched Sunday morning talk shows or "The Daily Show" did the best in the study.
(h/t Poynter)
UPDATE: Fox News hit out at the school responsible for the study on Thursday. A spokesperson for the network told The Hollywood Reporter, "Considering FDU’s undergraduate school is ranked as one of the worst in the country, we suggest the school invest in improving its weak academic program instead of spending money on frivolous polling – their student body does not deserve to be so ill-informed."
Media Study
Faces of Fox News


1 of 24



Getty


so shaggy.. you watch fox news :-P because you are really ill informed
 

Stillbuzzin

Well-Known Member
Anyone with pictures of the day it happened, and that can prove a missile went in the building (not a plane) will tell you it. (The main evidence is the blue paint on the remaining metal, its not american airlines blue, it's the blue from a certain missile. And the light post in front of the pentagon didn't get hit. Unless you can magically make planes fly straight down for a moment, it's impossible for a commercial sized plane to have not knocked down the light post at the angle it came in. And there's a video of the plane coming in to reference.)







You are not even talking about the same thing. If you will look at what I ask you, you will see what I am talking about.Again I will ask you where did you get the info that said no one was in the Pentagon when it was hit.There is a list of the people that were killed . Why are you changing the topic?
 

srh88

Well-Known Member
Anyone with pictures of the day it happened, and that can prove a missile went in the building (not a plane) will tell you it. (The main evidence is the blue paint on the remaining metal, its not american airlines blue, it's the blue from a certain missile. And the light post in front of the pentagon didn't get hit. Unless you can magically make planes fly straight down for a moment, it's impossible for a commercial sized plane to have not knocked down the light post at the angle it came in. And there's a video of the plane coming in to reference.)







You are not even talking about the same thing. If you will look at what I ask you, you will see what I am talking about.Again I will ask you where did you get the info that said no one was in the Pentagon when it was hit.There is a list of the people that were killed . Why are you changing the topic?
he knows hes wrong.. trying to redeem himself
 

Kaendar

Well-Known Member
your right why can you accept the facts if it was the truth i would have heard about it on the news by now lol
Most idiotic statement in this thread. The news? Are you fucking kidding me? The news is owned and managed by mass media corporations, that control what they report. The news doesnt tell the fuckin truth about shit like this. Im still in disbelief that you said this.
 

stickyicky0420

Well-Known Member
exactly :) 9/11 was a verry sad day a many many died but if you listen to shaggy you would be led to belive that no one died in the pentagon and it was a missile that hit it not a plane. so my question to him is all the passengers abord the plane that hit the pentagon they didt die either did they shaggy wait it never hit so what happend to the plane? what happend to all of the passengers and the pilots they also died its verry sad that all of these people died for no reason and now someone is gonna act like it never happend no matter how many facts you bring to shaggy he isnt going to listen to them so there isnt any point in trying. you have a better chance convinceing him that 2 pac is relly dead rofl :)
 

MellowFarmer

Well-Known Member
#22 from the Truth Suppression Playbook:

(22) Manufacture a New Truth ~ Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.
Example: The False Memory Syndrome Foundation and American Family Foundation and American and Canadian Psychiatric Associations fall into this category, as their founding members and/or leadership include key persons associated with CIA Mind Control research. Read The Professional Paranoid or Phsychic Dictatorship in the U.S.A. by Alex Constantine for more information. Not so curious, then, that (in a perhaps oversimplified explanation here) these organizations focus on, by means of their own "research findings", that there is no such thing as Mind Control.
Proper response: Unless you are in a position to be well versed in the topic and know of the background and relationships involved in the opponent organization, you are not well equipped to fight this tactic.

To view the rest

http://loveforlife.com.au/content/08/02/09/25-ways-suppress-truth-rules-dis-information-michael-sweeny
 

srh88

Well-Known Member
#22 from the Truth Suppression Playbook:

(22) Manufacture a New Truth ~ Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.
Example: The False Memory Syndrome Foundation and American Family Foundation and American and Canadian Psychiatric Associations fall into this category, as their founding members and/or leadership include key persons associated with CIA Mind Control research. Read The Professional Paranoid or Phsychic Dictatorship in the U.S.A. by Alex Constantine for more information. Not so curious, then, that (in a perhaps oversimplified explanation here) these organizations focus on, by means of their own "research findings", that there is no such thing as Mind Control.
Proper response: Unless you are in a position to be well versed in the topic and know of the background and relationships involved in the opponent organization, you are not well equipped to fight this tactic.

To view the rest

http://loveforlife.com.au/content/08/02/09/25-ways-suppress-truth-rules-dis-information-michael-sweeny
 

stickyicky0420

Well-Known Member
lol mellow farmer idk what kind of shit u been smoking bro lol i know one thing its not of this earth kinda like your post. rofl
 

MellowFarmer

Well-Known Member
srh88 & sticky, you are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. Your imply guilt by association and attack truth on the basis of the messenger. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top