911 conspiracy theory

guy incognito said:
So you believe the ear witness accounts of people that were caught in what is no doubt the most traumatic event of their life(and were probably good financial planners and bankers - but how many were demo experts)? But you don't trust the literal mountain of evidence that quite logically explains the entire series of events?

The rest of your comment leads me to believe you don't have the faintest clue of what actually happened inside the building. Someone told you they were made to withstand a plane, and you saw it collapse after a plane hit it. No need to investigate the situation further, must be an inside job. Good work columbo.
Click to expand...

What literal mountain of evidence?
 
stickyicky0420 said:
exactly thank you there makeing so much money cause there are so many dumb asses willing to belive anything aslong as it is a conspiricy they cant belive the truth lol so no point in giveing them the facts anymore they keeps saying the same thing. "the towers where built to whitstand a plane attack? relly jet fule is the hottest buring fule there is a 747 with a full tank and a thousand feet of a burning building will bring down any structure these conspiracy therist need to find facts unsted of reposting the same old opinions i rofl at any one dumb enough to belive this shit considering probably 95% of people belive its a terrist attack so that laves 5% of people with to much time on there hands and crazy people who will listen to anything BUT FACTS!
Click to expand...
All of your posts are disinformation tactics. You are flinging insults and disregarding facts.

LtCol. Jeff Latas
Former USAF Accident Investigation President
06/25/07
Pilotsfor911truth.org member LtCol. Jeff Latas and Co-Founder Rob Balsamo chat about 9/11, lack of a real investigation, Flight Data Recorder conflicts with govt story, politics and the war.

[video=youtube_share;tZoWuyZ6Wzg]http://youtu.be/tZoWuyZ6Wzg[/video]
 
stickyicky0420 said:
no one ever said that dumb ass i dont like our dirty goverment but that dosent mean i need to belive something that dosent make sense and if there are facts to the contrary like in 9/11 then wtf. just tell me one thing with out saying "disinformation tactics" if it were a missle that hit the pentagon where did the plane go and where did all of the people go that hit the pentagon? did bigfoot abduct them? and whats the point of flying a plane into a building if your going to blow it up anyways? couldnt they have blown it up and say terrist planted bombs? sounds a little crazy to me and when thoughs passengers over powerd that terrist and crashed the plane into the field? did the cia set off a bomb there to rofl?
Click to expand...
A plane can be considered a missile but I am not claiming to know what happened just that it sure as hell didn't happen like Big Gov leads us to believe. Ever heard of drones?

United 93 transponder is recognized by Air Traffic Control as airborne after alleged impact time. Some have made the excuse this is due to Coast Mode tracking. ATC did not recognize any signs of CST (Coast Mode). Further confirmation that this was not any type of "Coast Mode" is that ATC also recognized United 93 reporting an altitude. The only way ATC could observe a reported altitude is if United 93 were squawking Mode C on the transponder, which means altitude reporting capability. Further confirmation comes in the form of latitude and longitude positions reported by ATC. N39 51 - W78 46 were reported as the last known radar position of United 93. It is unclear if the position is reported as Degrees, Minutes or Decimal, however, standard aviation terminology is in Degrees, Minutes. With that said, both positions are well past the alleged United 93 Crash site.

[video=youtube_share;SyGl8UzitMw]http://youtu.be/SyGl8UzitMw[/video]
 
anyways its a shame when people die by the hands of our enemies ..even worse is when our own kind takes up for the enemy..im done with this thread ..you guys should honestly take a hard look at yourselves ...
 
MellowFarmer said:
All of your posts are disinformation tactics. You are flinging insults and disregarding facts.

LtCol. Jeff Latas
Former USAF Accident Investigation President
06/25/07
Pilotsfor911truth.org member LtCol. Jeff Latas and Co-Founder Rob Balsamo chat about 9/11, lack of a real investigation, Flight Data Recorder conflicts with govt story, politics and the war.

[video=youtube_share;tZoWuyZ6Wzg]http://youtu.be/tZoWuyZ6Wzg[/video]
Click to expand...
there he goes agin rofl with
disinformation tactics
haha told you he would say that hahaha rofl
 
im flinging facts but you cant handle the truth so you call it "disinformation tactics" rofl you have posted that same word over 12 times on this thred it seams like "disinformation tactics" is another word for "i dont want to listen to facts"
 
I gotta tell you troll your debunking website is a hoot! bongsmilie

Conspiracy theorists like to say "Some Arabs with box cutters couldn't have pulled this off." Let's forget for a minute how racist that statement is. (Arabs can do anything Americans can do) Let's also imagine that the hijackers didn't make it clear they had a bomb as well as the box cutters. The fact is they were the perfect ones to pull this off. Osama went to school for civil engineering at a time when the towers were being built. America thought enough of him to use him to hold off the USSR in Afghanistan. Most of the hijackers have college educations. Some had flight experience and trained with simulators.
 
stickyicky0420 said:
rofl yea if you were so smart you would know it wasnt an inside job we have gained nothing from 9/11 except a pointless war that is costing us big time
Click to expand...

stickyicky0420 said:
i know right lol HAHAHAHAHA this thred make me laugh to dude :)
Click to expand...

stickyicky0420 said:
it shure seams that way to me either that or hes was but fucked when he was little either one would explane his false since of reality
Click to expand...

stickyicky0420 said:
rofl :bigjoint:
Click to expand...

stickyicky0420 said:
there he goes agin rofl with
disinformation tactics
haha told you he would say that hahaha rofl
Click to expand...

stickyicky0420 said:
im flinging facts but you cant handle the truth so you call it "disinformation tactics" rofl you have posted that same word over 12 times on this thred it seams like "disinformation tactics" is another word for "i dont want to listen to facts"
Click to expand...

These are all of your posts just on this page... what facts?
 
MellowFarmer said:
What literal mountain of evidence?
Click to expand...

All the evidence that explains the serious of events. The planes crash into the building severing support beams and knocking fire proofing off the beams. Jet fuel igniting and also pouring down the inside of the building causing fires from the ground up. The steel responding to the heat by weakening, which eventually causes the top portion of the building to collapse, which creates enough dynamic forces on the structure below that it causes it to also collapse, and so on all the way down.

What exactly doesn't jive about that?
 
guy incognito said:
All the evidence that explains the serious of events. The planes crash into the building severing support beams and knocking fire proofing off the beams. Jet fuel igniting and also pouring down the inside of the building causing fires from the ground up. The steel responding to the heat by weakening, which eventually causes the top portion of the building to collapse, which creates enough dynamic forces on the structure below that it causes it to also collapse, and so on all the way down.

What exactly doesn't jive about that?
Click to expand...

Why hasn't the government provided any physical evidence of the identity of the alleged aircraft involved? None at all with all 4 planes? But the passports of the alleged hijackers were found intact?
 
MellowFarmer said:
Another insult without factual references... are all of you CIA trolls?
Click to expand...

That movie is a joke. That's not an insult, it's an accurate statement. I honestly don't feel the need to rebutt every claim. Did you watch the movie? You may want to watch it before you defend it and jump on me.
 
MellowFarmer said:
Why hasn't the government provided any physical evidence of the identity of the alleged aircraft involved? None at all with all 4 planes? But the passports of the alleged hijackers were found intact?
Click to expand...

http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pseudosc/911NutPhysics0.HTM

check out the 2nd picture. As the author says:

Figure 66(o). Why doesn't the paper burn?
  1. The fire hasn't reached it yet.
  2. Actually, there is a fire on the ground around the burning vehicle, so the paper nearest the fire is burning. But overall, there isn't enough paper to sustain a spreading fire. Anyone who's ever tried to keep a fire burning knows that it's very hard to keep a fire going from the sides or top. If the fire isn't under the combustible material, it's awfully hard to keep it going.


So how did the car catch on fire, but not the paper? The cars were set on fire first, probably by jet fuel from the plane crashes. The paper fell when the towers collapsed (you can see falling paper in many videos, and the paper in the tree branches is pretty informative).

Oh, by the way, all that paper pretty much demolishes the idea that passports and other personal effects couldn't have survived.

There you have it. Real photographic evidence showing you that its not only possible that passports and other paper documents can survive that crash, but they did, I see them right there.
 
I can't remember folk getting this excited since JR EWING got shot

are the government simply incompetent imbeciles unable to protect the public from terrorism ?
or are they liars creating the threat of terror for their own political ends ?

the fact such widespread doubt still remains the fact it happened in the first place all points to government incompetence imo
why some folk blindly worship these government weasels is beyond me

peace :)
 
guy incognito said:
That movie is a joke. That's not an insult, it's an accurate statement. I honestly don't feel the need to rebutt every claim. Did you watch the movie? You may want to watch it before you defend it and jump on me.
Click to expand...

Saw it and recommend all watch it! Give me one inaccuracy please?
 
guy incognito said:
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pseudosc/911NutPhysics0.HTM

check out the 2nd picture. As the author says:

Figure 66(o). Why doesn't the paper burn?
  1. The fire hasn't reached it yet.
  2. Actually, there is a fire on the ground around the burning vehicle, so the paper nearest the fire is burning. But overall, there isn't enough paper to sustain a spreading fire. Anyone who's ever tried to keep a fire burning knows that it's very hard to keep a fire going from the sides or top. If the fire isn't under the combustible material, it's awfully hard to keep it going.


So how did the car catch on fire, but not the paper? The cars were set on fire first, probably by jet fuel from the plane crashes. The paper fell when the towers collapsed (you can see falling paper in many videos, and the paper in the tree branches is pretty informative).

Oh, by the way, all that paper pretty much demolishes the idea that passports and other personal effects couldn't have survived.

There you have it. Real photographic evidence showing you that its not only possible that passports and other paper documents can survive that crash, but they did, I see them right there.
Click to expand...

But nothing to specifically identify the aircraft?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top