Well cmon, it's obvious neither one of you know your ass from the hole in the ground when it comes to investments and taxes.substantive reply from the guy with the UTI plants.
Well cmon, it's obvious neither one of you know your ass from the hole in the ground when it comes to investments and taxes.substantive reply from the guy with the UTI plants.
i know the difference between $50 and $77,731.00, unlike some people here.Well cmon, it's obvious neither one of you know your ass from the hole in the ground when it comes to investments and taxes.
I've written off capital losses before. It adjusted my taxable amount, not the tax itself (except as proportioned through the margin). So how is that a fail? cnWell cmon, it's obvious neither one of you know your ass from the hole in the ground when it comes to investments and taxes.
I think we all know the difference between $77K and $50, you're just having a hard time distinguishing the difference between a loss and a deduction, common mistake from people that have never had to deal with neither on the same return!i know the difference between $50 and $77,731.00, unlike some people here.
I've written off capital losses before. It adjusted my taxable amount, not the tax itself (except as proportioned through the margin). So how is that a fail? cn
You Republitards are so fucking dumb. Ireland is part of Britian now?No need for personal attacks.
You mad bro, or are you embarrassed and pissed off because the Brits couldn't even run proper security at a sporting event, perhaps you're just a typical American hater?
I remember years ago when I used to say some stupid childish shit when I was mad and frustrated, my father made me write some of it down. He saved a few for me to read when I grew up, I couldn't stop laughing when we finally read them, in front of my wife!and beenthere has still not done anything of substance, only a simple "you're wrong, i know better than you!".
just like he does with growing. proclaims himself a master grower, but has only ever displayed sickly yellow twigs. so much fail, always good for an LOL though.
I'm not a republican, mate. And I thought Ireland was part of the UK, do you now call an irishman a Brit? LOLYou Republitards are so fucking dumb. Ireland is part of Britian now?
The max naked capital loss you can write off in a year is $3K; I'll grant that and I've always found it to be an oddly ungenerous figure. If they had reportable capital gains to offset the loss that year, they can use the entire loss for a final savings. But yes; I incorrectly conflated capital and income taxes. cnAt least you're civil, I appreciate it.
Well first off, you're mixing up the write off with a marginal rate, you don't get the same percentage of write off as your marginal rate. Second, Mitt has been hammered for the last year about the 14% effective rate he pays on his capital gains and you have him getting a deduction at a marginal rate of 20-30%, the cap rate on capital gains is 15%. Third, the maximum capital loss you can write in a single year is $3k.
i'm amused by you, not mad or frustrated. you get your ass handed to you so often that it's funny.I remember years ago when I used to say some stupid childish shit when I was mad and frustrated, my father made me write some of it down. He saved a few for me to read when I grew up, I couldn't stop laughing when we finally read them, in front of my wife!
Print your posts and stick them away Bucky.
No worries, I know just enough to get me in trouble!The max naked capital loss you can write off in a year is $3K; I'll grant that and I've always found it to be an oddly ungenerous figure. If they had reportable capital gains to offset the loss that year, they can use the entire loss for a final savings. But yes; I incorrectly conflated capital and income taxes. cn
Nah, ya got me on that one!are you still right about whose/who's?
there's absolutely nothing wrong with it, unless you happen to be trying to show how in touch you are with the average american.I'd like to know why the media thinks Ann Romney is so bad for buying this shirt. Can anyone explain what the hell is wrong with spending $1000 on a shirt if you can afford it?
Would you be saying the same thing if it was the first lady, no you wouldn't.there's absolutely nothing wrong with it, unless you happen to be trying to show how in touch you are with the average american.
hey, how many people here have $1000 dollar shirts and swiss bank accounts?
]Would you be saying the same thing if it was the first lady, no you wouldn't.
Why are you such a partisan?
On the one hand ... yes; it's her right.I'd like to know why the media thinks Ann Romney is so bad for buying this shirt. Can anyone explain what the hell is wrong with spending $1000 on a shirt if you can afford it?
i really don't give a shit about the shirt, it's what wearing it while going on TV to talk about how much she identifies with average americans that bothers me.On the one hand ... yes; it's her right.
On the other ... it's scientific fact that the shirt is fuck-ugly. Spending a grand on a fuck-ugly shirt to wear while the cameras are on is like giving the audience ... the bird. cn
But why in the hell are you lefties and the media making such a big issue about it, I really don't understand. Is it because she is a conservative or that she is rich, or both?On the one hand ... yes; it's her right.
On the other ... it's scientific fact that the shirt is fuck-ugly. Spending a grand on a fuck-ugly shirt to wear while the cameras are on is like giving the audience ... the bird. cn