There is a protest going on right now at my local chick fil a

[st0wandgrow]

I believe that is what started this entire controversy because that is exactly what started this entire controversy.

I have seen no evidence here, or anywhere else, of "Cathy donating millions to anti-gay groups."

I'll come back later and look for the "edit" on this post ......

 

[UncleBuck]

You cant compare race to sexual orientation. You cant live a decent life if your race isnt accepted. But you can go without sex. Plenty of devouts are celibate and dont have any problems.

 

[Johnnyorganic]

chick-kill-gay donates millions of dollars to the family research council.

in 2010, the FRC spent tens of thousands of dollars lobbying congress to NOT condemn the "kill the gays" bill in uganda.

hence, i get to say that if you support chick-kill-gay, you are giving your approval to wholesale slaughter and destruction of gays.

hope that tastes as good as the greasy, processed, abused poultry these people shove down their fat, bigoted mouths.

Thanks, Buck.

That gives me something to look into.

It's more truthful to say that if you support Chick-Fil-A, you are giving your approval to wholesale slaughter and destruction of chickens.

 

[Johnnyorganic]

I'll come back later and look for the "edit" on this post ......

Why?

It was true when I posted it.

 

[cannabineer]

This has nothing to do with religion, at least not on my part. I believe that gays should be able to be domestic partners or be civil unions or whatever and have the same rights that traditional couples have. They can do that already in some states without altering the definition of marriage.

I keep proving this wrong, and like the inflatable clown (and with as little shame) you bounce right back and continue with this story. "Traditional definition of marriage" is a phrase that has no traction outside dominionist/chiliast circles. cn

 

[srh88]

I keep proving this wrong, and like the inflatable clown (and with as little shame) you bounce right back and continue with this story. "Traditional definition of marriage" is a phrase that has no traction outside dominionist/chiliast circles. cn

[video=youtube;YtespeLin2c]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtespeLin2c[/video]

 

[Kaendar]

I keep proving this wrong, and like the inflatable clown (and with as little shame) you bounce right back and continue with this story. "Traditional definition of marriage" is a phrase that has no traction outside dominionist/chiliast circles. cn

If I was king of America right now, I would immediately enact a law that gives gays every legal right and benefit or marriage as traditional couples. They can get a license, the whole 9 yards and be called "life partners" or something like that. Problem solved. If they continued to protest and bitch and complain, they can leave.

 

[UncleBuck]

Thanks, Buck.

That gives me something to look into.

It's more truthful to say that if you support Chick-Fil-A, you are giving your approval to wholesale slaughter and destruction of chickens.

good reminder there.

in addition to supporting a company which donates to lobbyists who would not condemn the wholesale slaughter of gays, supporting chick-kill-gay also means you support the practices seen in the video below.

warning: not for the faint of heart or anyone who wants to blissfully continue eating chicken that is produced inhumanely.

[video=youtube;sMUkAhHH6cY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMUkAhHH6cY[/video]

 

[Wordz]

Wordz, rollie just owned you in the other thread yet you continue on with your bullshit.

oh did he?

 

[srh88]

 

[srh88]

right... he said its not him

 

[Wordz]

I'm gonna have to say for $7.50 that kind of sucked if it was 5 bucks it would of been ok.

 

[cannabineer]

If I was king of America right now, I would immediately enact a law that gives gays every legal right and benefit or marriage as traditional couples. They can get a license, the whole 9 yards and be called "life partners" or something like that. Problem solved. If they continued to protest and bitch and complain, they can leave.

So you would allow them to adopt a single last name?
You'd allow them to adopt children without impediment?
You'd recognize their tax and estate parity? They'd get to write "married" on their monuments?
A central right of the married is to use terms like "husband" and "wife". Since you would grant them EVERY legal right and benefit, they'd get this as well?
Assuming they form and succeed with a very popular LGBT denomination with congregations all over the place, would your state grant theat denomination the same rights of licensure, non-profit and ordination?
Or would you hide some "separate but equal" codicil that diminishes what you call "non-traditional" marriages and impede their assimilation as full equals in all particulars?

If you grant them full legal parity and benefit, about what are you anticipating they'd complain? There's an internal inconsistency here. cn

 

[Kaendar]

So you would allow them to adopt a single last name?
You'd allow them to adopt children without impediment?
You'd recognize their tax and estate parity? They'd get to write "married" on their monuments?
A central right of the married is to use terms like "husband" and "wife". Since you would grant them EVERY legal right and benefit, they'd get this as well?
Assuming they form and succeed with a very popular LGBT denomination with congregations all over the place, would your state grant theat denomination the same rights of licensure, non-profit and ordination?
Or would you hide some "separate but equal" codicil that diminishes what you call "non-traditional" marriages and impede their assimilation as full equals in all particulars?

If you grant them full legal parity and benefit, about what are you anticipating they'd complain? There's an internal inconsistency here. cn

Yes, yes, yes, if they feel so inclined to call eachother husband or wife then sure, what do you mean, like a gay religion? They would have full legal benefit. I said if they complain because gays have a tendency to not know when to shut the fuck up. Im sure some of them would somehow find something to complain about, at which point in time they wouldnt be welcome.

 

[cannabineer]

Yes, yes, yes, if they feel so inclined to call eachother husband or wife then sure, what do you mean, like a gay religion? They would have full legal benefit. I said if they complain because gays have a tendency to not know when to shut the fuck up. Im sure some of them would somehow find something to complain about, at which point in time they wouldnt be welcome.

Something I'm not following here.
You just said yes; equal in all particulars ... and yet you anticipate grief because "gays have a tendency to not know when to shut the fuck up".
It follows with rather constraining logic that you've convicted them without trial of not wanting equality but superiority.
Would that not meet even a fairly relaxed definition of prejudice?
cn

 

[UncleBuck]

this is tony perkins, head of the family research council, a group which supports the "kill the gays" bill in uganda.

total closet case, just like most everyone else who speaks out against the evils of homosexuality.

 

[VICTORYGARDENSHYDRO]

this is tony perkins, head of the family research council, a group which supports the "kill the gays" bill in uganda.

total closet case, just like most everyone else who speaks out against the evils of homosexuality.

that guy is a total ankle grabber

 

[UncleBuck]

gays have a tendency to not know when to shut the fuck up

says the guy who thinks daytime top watering causes forest fires and that gays are paving the way for dog fucking pedophiles while getting laughed off a website for wanting to be a cop who smokes weed and brings his own gun on patrol.

 

[srh88]

hes a CI he gotta be lol

 

[Kaendar]

Something I'm not following here.
You just said yes; equal in all particulars ... and yet you anticipate grief because "gays have a tendency to not know when to shut the fuck up".
It follows with rather constraining logic that you've convicted them without trial of not wanting equality but superiority.
Would that not meet even a fairly relaxed definition of prejudice?
cn

Maybe you dont watch the news, or know many gays, but I can honestly say that they do want superiority. I think that even with full rights, legal equality, etc, they wont stop until everyone bows down and says they agree with their lifestyle. Instead of the KKK, think Gay Gay Gay.