canndo
Well-Known Member
More than anything it has been concerns over what will happen. My taxes increased during Obama, and every other small business owner I know agrees that their's increased as well. We have all been worried about what the AFA would do, which scares owners from hiring employees when we arent sure what our responsibilities will be. The stock market has been fluctuating so much that it also adds concerns. The stock market fluctuations are direct results of what is happening/not happening in Congress. Still wondering about whats going to happen with the Bush Tax cuts. If my taxes are about to jump up 10%, I cant afford to hire employees. So we are stuck in a stasis with no clear vision whatsoever in what the future holds.
Repeatedly I see business owners posting that Obama's policies are keeping them from hiring. I have heard it on occasion even on radio talk shows. Yet, whenever the business owner is questioned as to exactly what policies those are they most often give the same one that is given here.
"More than anything it is the uncertainty" Is the refrain, here as well. The point is that it is NOT OBAMA'S policies that are keeping you from hiring. Beyond that, if business were as paralized as owners claim by their "not knowing what will happen", then no business would ever hire anyone ever again. the news is that no one ever knows "what will happen" and we as business owners who didn't know "what would happen" when we started our businesses. We took risks with our time and money and resources let alone those who jumped from being an employee to an owner and we never "knew what would happen".
the truth is that you hire based upon need today and in the near future. The truth is that in most cases you are not bound to keep those you hire and your costs of a RIF, though not minor are not enough to keep the average business from hiring as a result of an evaluated value of a work force increase.
Beyond even that. In my industry we REALLY don't know what will happen next, it could be that I am placed in jail, but that has little effect on my current direction. The lesson here is that what happens in our perspective industries, and what happens localy in the environment and in local regulations and laws is a more powerful incentive to hire or not hire than whatever moaning one does over a particular president.
In short althor, I suspect that your hesitancy over hiring actually has very little to do with the presidency or what congress does. I am saddened by the number of times I have seen or heard this indictment of this president with vaguaries and inuendo.