Obama DEA 610% more Federal Indictments for MJ and ~50% more possesion charges

stoned cockatoo

stoned cockatoo

New Member
I often wonder what people who defend any power figure that is anti marijuana are doing on a marijuana forum.

Shit look at the politics section it's just 2 sides of members who are here for the same reasons (cannabis) but continually argue with eachother over 2 asshole politician's that just want you in jail. They got us arguing with eachother fuck them all
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
deprave said:
I will refer you to the OP..

There is no justified 'cracking down' on bits of vegetation, people should not be robbed and harmed for bits of vegetation.


The DEA is not our friend.
Click to expand...
i agree with you, but nonetheless it's justified under the eyes of the law. obama was quite clear in stating that he was not giving carte blanche to a cannabis industry.
 
deprave

deprave

New Member
unclebuck said:
i agree with you, but nonetheless it's justified under the eyes of the law. Obama was quite clear in stating that he was not giving carte blanche to a cannabis industry.
Click to expand...
so why hasn't he stopped the irs or the dea!?!!?! They have escalated this!


"I agree with you"


"I disagree with you"


Is a cop out....and Irrelevant!


Come to the adult table?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
Lol, you've finally lost it.

I can quote you several times saying it was citizen ballots that brought them in, not the President.
Click to expand...
the laws allowing medical cannabis and dispensaries were put in place by we the people.

for some reason, after obama made an announcement in 2009, lots of people started opening up the damn things.

deprave, don't have a conniption that i am stating historical facts.
 
deprave

deprave

New Member
UncleBuck said:
complain to the state AGs who ignore the memo telling them to make it low priority. putting the other guy in place will make it much worse.
Click to expand...
Another false dichotomy...

and


Irrelevant


Give up your ego in this cloak on anonymity? Are you to afraid to do this? Is UnbleBuck more important to you than your real identity?


New Flash..>You are not UncleBuck the bleeding heart Obama supporter...You are a human being..Your ego will survive.

Men with mp5's running into peoples houses and enslaving people over bits of vegetation are not justified!
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
deprave said:
Another false dichotomy...

and


Irrelevant


Give up your ego in this cloak on anonymity? Are you to afraid to do this? Is UnbleBuck more important to you than your real identity?


New Flash..>You are not UncleBuck the bleeding heart Obama supporter...You are a human being..Your ego will survive.
Click to expand...
i was going to say that i'm not going to respond anymore since you would just edit and edit and edit and edit and edit after i respond, and after i clicked reply, whadya know?

you had edited it already! :clap:

it is not a false dichotomy. obama or romney will end up in the oval office. whose policies do you think will be more favorable?
 
deprave

deprave

New Member
UncleBuck said:
i was going to say that i'm not going to respond anymore since you would just edit and edit and edit and edit and edit after i respond, and after i clicked reply, whadya know?

you had edited it already! :clap:

it is not a false dichotomy. obama or romney will end up in the oval office. whose policies do you think will be more favorable?
Click to expand...
Yes it is...A vote for Obama is a vote for Romney...
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
compare to:

"What I specifically said was that we were not going to prioritize prosecutions of persons who are using medical marijuana. I never made a commitment that somehow we were going to give carte blanche to large-scale producers and operators of marijuana – and the reason is, because it's against federal law. I can't nullify congressional law. I can't ask the Justice Department to say, 'Ignore completely a federal law that's on the books.' What I can say is, 'Use your prosecutorial discretion and properly prioritize your resources to go after things that are really doing folks damage.' As a consequence, there haven't been prosecutions of users of marijuana for medical purposes."


 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Last edited by deprave; 08-27-2012 at 06:20 PM.

Last edited by deprave; 08-27-2012 at 07:50 PM.

Last edited by deprave; 08-27-2012 at 08:33 PM.

Last edited by deprave; 08-27-2012 at 08:43 PM.

Last edited by deprave; 08-27-2012 at 09:19 PM.

Last edited by deprave; 08-27-2012 at 09:29 PM.

Last edited by deprave; 08-27-2012 at 10:42 PM.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top