No More Bush Tax Cuts for the Wealthiest

[Dr Kynes]

It is not my opinion that the rich have gotten richer while the poor have gotten poorer. It is a fact.

it's a fact that has continued from the dawn of time to now. the rich always get richer. if they worked at the coal face like the rest of us then they would be called "The Poor" not "The Rich".

the rich get richer no matter what weepy leftists try to do, even in the leftist revolutions of the soviet union, cuba, most of africa, most of europe, and most oif asia the rich got richer, and the poor got fucked. in the maxist revolutions the title of "The Rich" was transferred from the bourgeois to the party elite, but the game didnt change. only the faces at the top.

putting "The Rich" up against a wall and maachinegunning them only created an entirely new (but indistinguishable) class of rich fuckers who wield power to keep the little guy down. at least here in america the little guy has an outside chance to make it big and join the rich guys club. even in the new interstitial utopia of scandinavia the little guy can never climb the fence to join the fat cats. the fence is too high, and the government patrols it with attack dogs and machine pistols.

 

[Dr Kynes]

Protecting citizens from this sort of thing has a constitutional precedent.

citizens didnt get protected from shit. the bankers got protected from having to sell their third yacht, or their fifth summer home in hawaii, but the rest of us got longdonged.

 

[UncleBuck]

the rich always get richer.

demonstrably false. but A+ on the rest of your fancy argument based upon a false premise.

income inequality inversely correlates with tax rates.

 

[Harrekin]

The income difference between the rich and poor will always be huge.

You know why? Because when "the poor" become successful, they are then defined as "the rich".

Statistics, great huh?

 

[ChesusRice]

The income difference between the rich and poor will always be huge.

You know why? Because when "the poor" become successful, they are then defined as "the rich".

Statistics, great huh?

Ever play the game Monopoly?
What happens when one person owns the majority of the Board?

Life isnt a game

 

[Dr Kynes]

demonstrably false. but A+ on the rest of your fancy argument based upon a false premise.

income inequality inversely correlates with tax rates.

that statistical bullshit is simply irrelevant. personal income as recorded by income tax records does not record or acknowledge income from capital gains and other investments, by design. the steady and measurable in crease of the wealth of the wealthiest has been going on throughout recorded history, and your statistical flim-flam doesnt mean shit. "rich folks dont pay income taxes" is the song you sing all the day and half the night, but when you want to prove how much better the golden age of american progressivism was, you grab the tax data and hold it like an amish girl clutches her butter churn handle.

if you actually think that income tax rates mean dick to mitt romney paris hilton, diane feinstein and harry reid then you have to explain your position in a manner that is less retarded.

do you propose that since the top income tax rate has reduced this is the mechanism that has caused the hilton fortune, or romney's wealth, or the incredible riches of the senators in washington? or was it crony capitalism, and a lack of regulations to keep them in check when they made their dough through capital gains?

im sure that your next mindless copy/paste rectal prolapse will include the deal with satan mitt romney obviously made to support his dancing horse fixation.

 

[ChesusRice]

• Mechelle Obama incistes that the government is responsable for small business success; she also informs us that he husband Obama is gearing up for another 4 years of "stimulus" for not the middle class but he willbe hand feeding the lower class and allowing all imagrants to live off of tax payer money> This sucks: Please Vote For Mitt Romney.

You spammed this in another thread
It sounded just as ignorant there

 

[Dr Kynes]

Ever play the game Monopoly?
What happens when one person owns the majority of the Board?

Life isnt a game

? no?

i got a big box in my games closet that proves you wrong homey!

 

[ChesusRice]

if you actually think that income tax rates mean dick to mitt romney paris hilton, diane feinstein and harry reid then you have to explain your position in a manner that is less retarded.

Must mean something since he doesn't want to show his income tax returns

 

[UncleBuck]

statistical bullshit...irrelevant...statistical flim-flam doesnt mean shit...tax data...income tax rates...the top income tax rate ..

yep, it's all bullshit when empirical data flies in the face of your assertion.

not like a sir. like a serck perpert.

 

[UncleBuck]

? no?

i got a big box in my games closet that proves you wrong homey!

you've also got nothing to support your claim that the rich always get richer.

as empirical data clearly shows, income inequality often diminishes. not entirely, nor should it. but facts remain that you have nothing but your silly 'like a sir' nonsense to baffle us with bullshit.

 

[Dr Kynes]

yep, it's all bullshit when empirical data flies in the face of your assertion.

not like a sir. like a serck perpert.

then do explain why oil companies handle every dollar that exists in the world every two years, and on average 7% of that money sticks to their fingers through thick and thin.

tell me why the rockerfellers, the morgans and the carnegies are still rich ass motherfuckers despite the incredibly high toip marginal rates between the 40's and the 70's?

why do banks always show a profit even when the rest of the world is taking losses?

individual income is taxed on workers who draw a wage, not on poop-dicks who invest.

lern 2 brain.

 

[Dr Kynes]

you've also got nothing to support your claim that the rich always get richer.

as empirical data clearly shows, income inequality often diminishes. not entirely, nor should it. but facts remain that you have nothing but your silly 'like a sir' nonsense to baffle us with bullshit.

despite the remarkably high tax rates in england, the royal family is still the largest land holder in the world...

amazing. the rich get richer because they set the rules. populist demagogues like yourself try to stir up the lumpen proletariat with your silly charts and hamfisted deceit, but the only way the rich will ever stop getting richer is when they are put against the wall and shot, then the polit bureau takes all the wealth for their own benefit.

i suppose you fantasize that you will be one of the party elites after the inevitable coming socialist revolution

unfortunately youre more likely to wind up like leonid trotsky. with an icepick through your ear in a shitty flat in mexico city.

and i gotta wonder why you insist on saying "like a sir" so frequently? is it my image? lern 2 meme. thats lulzsec, not Gentlemen. i chose it because siome dickbreath said i was conceited in another thread, when his arguments were refuted.

just for you, i shall change it.

 

[Harrekin]

you've also got nothing to support your claim that the rich always get richer.

as empirical data clearly shows, income inequality often diminishes. not entirely, nor should it. but facts remain that you have nothing but your silly 'like a sir' nonsense to baffle us with bullshit.

Sounds like you should move to China, they already roll the way Obama wants to make America.

 

[UncleBuck]

then do explain...

then do explain why the income inequality gap shrinks at times and expands at others completely independent of any and all government regulation.

the rich get richer because they set the rules.

semantical dipshittery, sir.

the rich who set the rules may get richer, as your volley of examples well illustrates. but overall income inequality hinges on policy.

lern 2 logic.

 

[Dr Kynes]

Sounds like you should move to China, they already roll the way Obama wants to make America.

not quite. in china you can put antifreeze in toothpase, and poison in baby formula as long as it's for export.

obama would of course never allow such things, unless he gets a piece of the action.

 

[Dr Kynes]

then do explain why the income inequality gap shrinks at times and expands at others completely independent of any and all government regulation.



semantical dipshittery, sir.

the rich who set the rules may get richer, as your volley of examples well illustrates. but overall income inequality hinges on policy.

lern 2 logic.

your obsession with how much other people make, as compared to yourself is laughably self-obsessed. Billy Dee Williams started out poor, black and oppressed, and now he is LANDO CALRISSIAN! upward mobility is hampered by weenies like yourself who insist on locking down income rates to levels YOU deem appropriate, while such measures will have ZERO effect on those whop make their money by having money. under the system you seem to approve of, anyone who tries to get rich by working hard will slam his nose into the gilded ceiling of the investment class, and be doomed to forever toil in poverty. nice New Left bullshit there homey. hating on those who made it because you and the rest of the crabs couldnt pull them back into the bucket fast enough. shame on you.

your stupid chart is irrelevant because it only looks at wage earners, not investors. continuing to cling to this fallacious premise proves that you do NOT have what it takes to drink Colt 45.

youre just not smooth enough.

 

[UncleBuck]

and still no refutation of the empirical data from mrs. whiny cry bitch.

 

[Dr Kynes]

and still no refutation of the empirical data from mrs. whiny cry bitch.

what you want i should dig up a similarly useless chart displaying how wealth accretes through investment, not through wages? why bother. since it is well established that income taxes are separate from capital gains anyone who looks at that chart can see that is is irrelevant. it only shows the flat spot in wages from FDR's looney wage caps in ww2 and the slow climb out of the inflationary pit since then.

wages are not wealth and if you wish to insist that they are then you are only making yourself look less intelligent and less informed with each posting of drivel.

 

[UncleBuck]

what you want i should dig up a similarly useless chart displaying how wealth accretes through investment, not through wages? why bother. since it is well established that income taxes are separate from capital gains anyone who looks at that chart can see that is is irrelevant. it only shows the flat spot in wages from FDR's looney wage caps in ww2 and the slow climb out of the inflationary pit since then.

wages are not wealth and if you wish to insist that they are then you are only making yourself look less intelligent and less informed with each posting of drivel.

and every time you fail to address the documented expansion and contraction of income inequality as it relates to historical tax rates, you make yourself look more and more like a paid poster with lots of creative abilities but no juice to attack the facts.

let's go back and cut to the chase of this thread: defend the successes of trickle down economics.