UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
are you mad that you can't be a freeloading moocher on the system anymore?
written in crayon to abet understanding.
Experts: Job Spike Mostly Part-timers, Home-Based Jobs
- Thread starter rollinbud
- Start date
written in crayon to abet understanding.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Who's making fun? That's him in his high school year book finally making the track team. You're the puke!
Gee, thanks Canna!
Omgwtfbbq Indicaman
Well-Known Member
its sad marraige is what we are talking about, that fact alone is enough to show why america is slipping off the cliff.
FreedomWorks
Well-Known Member
OK, so its a little more than half that. But, its still a lot of IRS agents to hire. As the Obama administration’s public relations operation scrambles to say that Obamacare is not a tax, it is quietly ramping up the number of IRS agents to handle the burden of enforcing the law’s penalties. The IRS plans to hire some 16,500 new IRS agents in the coming months to meet the burden of enforcing Obamacare even though the president and his defenders say that only 1 percent of Americans will be affected by the law’s penalties, according to Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, who serves as vice chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation.
When most people think of health care reform they think of more doctors exams, not more IRS exams. Isn’t the federal government already intruding enough into our lives? We need thousands of new doctors and nurses in America, not thousands more IRS agents. In two and a half years Americans will need to start providing proof on their taxes that they have health insurance will be required to pay a penalty on their taxes. Once the penalty is phased in come 2016, it will equal $695 for each uninsured individual or 2.5 percent of family income, whichever is greater.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Omgwtfbbq Indicaman
Well-Known Member
in other words, you lied? you pulled a romney lol.
FreedomWorks
Well-Known Member
Do you really think they are going to stop at 17,000 New IRS agents? The original estimate was 30,000 and then later revised downward. I didn't lie about anything. Can I ask you something? And don't try to dodge the question either. Why are you so happy to see an already out of control bureaucracy expand so that it can bankrupt even more people? Its not ObamaCare if its to hire more IRS agents. It sounds more like ObamaTax. If this is what Obama meant by new jobs, then I'm not impressed. If this is how we got down to 7.8% unemployment, then I'm not impressed.Thats right, the middle class is going to take it right in the gut on this one. And I'm not impressed.
But I guess we probably shouldn't worry because Obama says hes going to grow the middle class from the bottom up, the middle out, sideways back in, and then cut the top off. Or whatever the hell that idiots always talking about.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
"And that’s the truth that the right can’t handle. The furor over Friday’s report revealed a political movement that is rooting for American failure, so obsessed with taking down Mr. Obama that good news for the nation’s long-suffering workers drives its members into a blind rage. It also revealed a movement that lives in an intellectual bubble, dealing with uncomfortable reality — whether that reality involves polls or economic data — not just by denying the facts, but by spinning wild conspiracy theories."
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/08/opinion/krugman-truth-about-jobs.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
Watch the first complaint be about the publication or author and not about the substance of the article.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/08/opinion/krugman-truth-about-jobs.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
Watch the first complaint be about the publication or author and not about the substance of the article.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Padwan,
The NY Times is ultra-liberal pornography. I would take an article on eugenics from Stormfront as seriously.
The NY Times is ultra-liberal pornography. I would take an article on eugenics from Stormfront as seriously.