cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
One of my favorite quips (and to my knowledge, an original) is "Great minds think alike ... and so do ours!!" cn
Because their beliefs affect you. Do you care if creationism is taught side by side with evolution? Or if evolution is thrown out of the classroom all together? Some people believe it should. A lot of people actually.For me ... there are three options in how to treat anothers belief.
Respect, Disrespect, and Indifference.
I tend to feel indifference towards others belief. Why should I care what people believe? I'm more interested in what I'm having for dinner.
Belief's don't affect me, actions do.Because their beliefs affect you. Do you care if creationism is taught side by side with evolution? Or if evolution is thrown out of the classroom all together? Some people believe it should. A lot of people actually.
Beliefs are principals of action.Belief's don't affect me, actions do.
not necessarily.Beliefs are principals of action.
It's that kind of thinking that gets people absolutely nowhere. Maybe you should look at the evolution of technology before you decide to dismiss space travel and how long it's going to take before we can reach new areas of space. There are senior citizens shitting their pants everyday at the things that we can do now.
Why don't you mind? I think it's outrageous we would teach that to impressionable young people. Let's stick to real facts only and not bullshit beliefs.Belief's don't affect me, actions do.
edit:
regarding creationism, I don't mind if creationism is taught, as long as its not taught as fact but as a 'belief' system.
I'm not a Muslim or Buddhist but have studied the faiths with genuine interest.
They said something similar to Copernicus.Why don't you mind? I think it's outrageous we would teach that to impressionable young people. Let's stick to real facts only and not bullshit beliefs.
Without the hyphen (inaction) it's definitely a word. cnnot necessarily.
They could be principals of in-action. and more often are.
i.e .. I don't believe in murder, so I don't do it.
edit:
LOL ... If 'in-action' is a word.
Yeah, I know. ... I'm a real heavy smoker and when stoned I temporarily forget my shit.Without the hyphen (inaction) it's definitely a word. cn
That in-action sparks action though. If you don't believe in murder, you must have some other means of dealing with your conflict. You could look at it as "I don't believe in murder, so instead I talk things out with people.", a bit of an extreme example. haha My point is that you almost never are truly "in-active", that inaction forces another action elsewhere generally.not necessarily.
They could be principals of in-action. and more often are.
i.e .. I don't believe in murder, so I don't do it.
edit:
LOL ... If 'in-action' is a word.
There is a fundamental difference between a new theory backed with observation and evidence, and a fairy tale. I have absolutely no problem with new theories being introduced and taught in schools, but I must insist they have evidence backing them.They said something similar to Copernicus.
I have had real trouble spelling when i sampled psychedelics. I usually don't post here when I'm properly hempstruck. Last night was an exception, i think. i have half a memory of leaving a somewhat disjoint haiku someplace. cnYeah, I know. ... I'm a real heavy smoker and when stoned I temporarily forget my shit.
edit:
Which paradoxically is one of the reasons I smoke so much lol
not necessarily.
They could be principals of in-action. and more often are.
i.e .. I don't believe in murder, so I don't do it.
edit:
LOL ... If 'in-action' is a word.
Who are you to insist anything?There is a fundamental difference between a new theory backed with observation and evidence, and a fairy tale. I have absolutely no problem with new theories being introduced and taught in schools, but I must insist they have evidence backing them.
Just on a medical level, I have to disagree. We have come a long way from the "4 humors" method of medical treatment. You can't have modern medicine without understanding how the human body works to some extent. Provided, there's always more to learn. To dismiss everything humanity has accomplished as getting us "...nowhere closer to understanding anything..." is a bit sweeping and unfair. The problem is, every time we answer a question, it generates several new questions as a result. We aren't clueless, but the harder we look the more there is to discover.in the grand scheme of things, the evolution of technology has got us nowhere closer to understanding anything, apart from letting us know that we know fuck all
"There is talk of a new astrologer who wants to prove that the earth moves and goes around instead of the sky, the sun, the moon, just as if somebody were moving in a carriage or ship might hold that he was sitting still and at rest while the earth and the trees walked and moved. But that is how things are nowadays: when a man wishes to be clever he must needs invent something special, and the way he does it must needs be the best! The fool wants to turn the whole art of astronomy upside-down. However, as Holy Scripture tells us, so did Joshua bid the sun to stand still and not the earth." -Martin Luther, regarding Copernicus' heliocentric theory.They said something similar to Copernicus.
A concerned and active participant in society, and as such I don't like seeing false information and false beliefs being taught as facts. It is harmful to society.Who are you to insist anything?
You're 'insistence' on what should or should not be taught IMO puts you into the same realm as some rather unsavory characters.
btw ... fairy tales are taught to young minds and I don't care.