Landrace
Member
i have never been abducted before but i have been visited by aliens
Illegal aliens or the space kind?
i have never been abducted before but i have been visited by aliens
Saying that you don't believe there is alien life and believing that intelligent alien life has not visited earth are two different sets rational thought. I have never heard of anyone afraid there is actually other intelligence out there and in fact, most of the skeptics I know think there probably is. You are correct that some sort of physical evidence would be helpful in convincing skeptics. It doesn't even have to be direct contact, just something more than people's stories.Most people say they dont believe in alien life or UFOs because they have never seen them. If that is the case, would just seeing them make you a believer? Maybe a landing or attack, some physical contact. This mentality is so predictable from people too afraid to believe that there might actualy be other intelligence out there. Tell me this, do you believe in GOD? Ever see him? Hmmmm. Didnt think so. But seeing is believing right. Lol.
You proved my point which is that you cannot say for certain whether its true or not, its like throwing a hubcap into the air and taking a picture then saying you've debunked the ufo theory, it proves nothing more than you can replicate the picture so the possibility still remains. Allow me to also point out that you state very clearly that to you it "indicates" that people were "trying" to visualize things they imagined. Of all the things to imagine they would imagine round flying objects in the sky thousands of years ago. Which is more plausible in reality?I don't think unidentified objects in religious drawings or paintings prove or disprove anything. There are many depiction's of imaginary animals and mythological beings drawn on parchment and cave walls but this seems to only indicate that people were trying to visualize things that they imagined or explain things that they didn't understand. Considering that people with religious views are already deep into imaginary things it shouldn't come as a surprise that they were making up many different objects and beings.
It's always better not to assume too much, I mentioned the paintings as an example of the possibility, Let me ask you something then, how would one imagine a round shiny silver flying disc in the sky then paint it into a religious painting some 500 years ago without any suggestive thought brought about by an existing visual. I know we as humans like to think ourselves special but the truth is most of our thoughts or visions be they creative or not are derised from something we thought or saw on a subconscious level from memory. Very little of what comes out of our heads is that original.So very true. How could one use this as evidence? It's like saying just because poisonous berries were identified as poisonous hundreds of years ago, maybe they weren't poisonous back then and it's just been a lie all along?
I believe we've evolved a lot over thousands of years... but people have more than likely always imagined things.
Want some berries newworldicon?
You are right and I am glad I read you say that. But the fact still remains that it was either top secret military or private flying craft or it was in fact beings from another planet. I too have witnessed a craft that was chrome and cylindrical shaped hover at night over the park close to my home. If it was human made it was seriously f**king advanced because when it lifted and shot off it was super quick, aerodynamics were thrown completely out the window on this object. When I started to research it I began to see other ufo pics of the same shape. To this day I do not know who or what was in there but it sure was beyond belief. I do pose the question though based on what I witnessed, do we as humans really know enough to build what I saw? To me it at the very least means that it's possible. Please also realize that for a person to actually admit this sort of thing is brave because the world has taught you to laugh it off in an instant.How many people on the flight took this approach to the sightings? And how many people thought it may have just been a military exercise that was necessary to be kept secret for defence purposes?
Everyone may have gone along with the theme of the moment whilst on the flight but sceptical ones would definitely have thought it over and may have come to a different assumption.
What I'm really trying to say is that, that doesn't really prove anything. But hey... this is an opinionated topic and everyone's entitled to their own.
I don't think that a plane full of people watching these things for hours as he says can mistake it for some northern lights. It's just not a plausible argument!you do realize how immense the forces on this planet are right? now how about the universe? in retrospect the way you describe it makes it seem as if what we have been seeing are not so much "crafts" but universal phenomenon much like the northern lights, perhaps these spots are other dimensions imposing on our universe resulting in these light shows(the constant shifting between the dimension would explain the movement too). honestly since no one has been able to get close to one to investigate we may never know.
http://www.siemens.com/innovation/apps/pof_microsite/_pof-spring-2010/_html_en/trends-targeting-nano-frontier.htmlTake a breath dude. Ever hear of a period?
BTW, I explain nano chips as non-existent fiction created for gullible people like you.
It's time you took a deep breath, whilst it is true that it is very difficult to prove an implant is alien, there are documented videos of implants miraculously dissolving whilst attempting to remove them. Check Dr. Leir and Sherry Shriner.Hey, if you have some evidence of extraterrestrial nano chips implanted in people, go ahead and present them. You aren't saying shit that is opinion, you made some flat out claims. Learn the difference and back up what you said instead of this bullshit hit and run post then avoid discussion because it is 'an opinion' and you're not 'here to argue.'
For the most part you are right only because there has been so much discrediting of the subject for so long. Hence now as a human species we require seeing aliens walking up to us and shaking hands, unfortunately that is a lot to ask for acceptance. Have you ever pondered the reasoning behind all the discrediting?Saying that you don't believe there is alien life and believing that intelligent alien life has not visited earth are two different sets rational thought. I have never heard of anyone afraid there is actually other intelligence out there and in fact, most of the skeptics I know think there probably is. You are correct that some sort of physical evidence would be helpful in convincing skeptics. It doesn't even have to be direct contact, just something more than people's stories.
Also take note that a UFO is not an alien spacecraft, no matter how much the term is misused. Seeing a UFO does NOT equate to seeing intelligent alien life. The very fact that something is unidentified is contrary to the claim that it is in fact a extraterrestrial spacecraft. UFO by the very definition means YOU DON'T KNOW what it is.
BTW, visitation from alien species is way more probable than the idea of an omnipotent, omniscient deity.
I always try to understand why they would do it, and yes it was a painstaking task so not without reason. There are civilisations all across the world that depict the same things yet for thousands of years never knew the other existed across the planet. What about vimanas of India and Pakistan. The tibetan monks have records of other beings visiting earth, loads of this sort of thing..Newworld, i believe your on the same path that im on, it is true that thousands of years ago people carved, etched and painted things on and into rock. Even in Egypt there are very good depictions of craft and saucers flying about. I doubt very much that someone took the painstaking time to carve pictures into rock that were fake.
Context man. I wasn't claiming nanotechnology doesn't exist. The quote I responded to was claiming nano chips of ET origin. You can't show current state of our nano-tech to support the claim that alien chips have been found in people.
I'm not about to do your research. If you have some evidence, present it. Citing this doctor or that doctor saw this or that is still just hearsay. Funny how all of the alien tech that people find somehow 'dissolves' when skeptics want to examine it.It's time you took a deep breath, whilst it is true that it is very difficult to prove an implant is alien, there are documented videos of implants miraculously dissolving whilst attempting to remove them. Check Dr. Leir and Sherry Shriner.
Never believed in Leprechauns. Till I met an Irish Midget at a bar....Well friends you must have heard about UFO's and lots of research are being going on this to find the real fact.
So, what do you think about it?
It also does not disprove that it's alien in origin, without a benchmark to reference against how would we ever know whats alien or human considering we are constantly coming up against hidden tech.Context man. I wasn't claiming nanotechnology doesn't exist. The quote I responded to was claiming nano chips of ET origin. You can't show current state of our nano-tech to support the claim that alien chips have been found in people.
You wouldn't be doing my research, I've done it already. It's for you to do, not too hard a task, all you have to do is google and read. You can try all you want with the cyber crap of " You make the claim so post the info" but I don't buy into it. Essentially you are arguing about who takes the time to post a link...ridiculous frankly.I'm not about to do your research. If you have some evidence, present it. Citing this doctor or that doctor saw this or that is still just hearsay. Funny how all of the alien tech that people find somehow 'dissolves' when skeptics want to examine it.