The first thing I would like to point out is that everyone here is anonymous. There is a significant chance that Red1966 is not the same red as over on stormfront and in addition, there is a chance that some dishonest person here created the account to discredit red.
One of the favorite tactics of people like K0jin, UB, Cheesy, etc. is to label someone racist and then fell like everything said can be discounted based on that judgement. Which makes it really hard to have a discussion on this forum.
What is frightening is that people use disgusting tactics like this because they cannot have a straight up debate and hope to win.
Are you sure it's "significant" when he has the same nick, started the users at almost the same moment in time and has the same views?
I don't think it's a coincidence. The variables are too alike and his lack of a proper defense of his actions are pitiful.
It doesn't take a lot of brainpower to figure out these two "red1966s" are extremely alike.
Of course there might be a chance someone created the account only to discredit red1966.
That seems very far fetched though. I don't know who has the time to go through that just to be able to say someone is a racist bigot.
I mean that would defeat the whole purpose in the first place.
Oh is that my favourite tactic? Now you know me intimately?
I have never called anyone a racist on this forum other than red1966 whom it seems is a racist.
I mean there is a lot larger chance of it actually being his account than there is someone would create that account just to discredit him.
If the latter is true, why haven't said person created an account on stormfront with your nick? Or freedomguys nick?
All I said was that if it's true red1966 the same as the stormfront account then he surely is a racist.
And if he is a racist and a bigot then there is no need to pay attention to anything he writes.
He has lost all credibility.
We already have debated you ignorant fools straight up.
But you guys twist everything around, you change the subject, you dig up useless information and call it credible.
You do all these evasive maneuvers to try to get your point across even though you have been thoroughly discredited.
In many ways it's like arguing with a religious person.
You are so stuck in your personal opinion and your beliefs that you can't even acknowledge when facts are dumped on your face.
That's why we don't take you seriously.
You are so delusional by nature, little of what you write makes sense.
I don't hate any of you, I'm not even angry or upset.
I'm just amazed at the ignorance that keeps floating around.
It's the same situation as when I argued against pre-harvest flushing.
Even though proper scientifically backed up facts are used, some people just don't even want to listen or read it.
They just deny everything which isn't backing up their opinion.
I can't be arsed to discuss pertinent subjects with people like this, it's a waste of time.
Because no matter how many facts or how much reason and logic one applies to the discussion, the subject will be twisted or it will be ignored or you will claim to have proved something wrong when in fact you did nothing of the sort.
I mean there is absolutely nothing to gain from this because you are so entrenched in your view.
I'd like to stress that I'm not a republican or a democrat, or even a lib.
I don't even live in the US.
I just speak up for reason. Because it amazes me to see so much ignorance taken so seriously.
It amazes me to see people proclaim all sorts of facts and truths when in fact they did nothing more than sprout they delusional thoughts.
What is frightening is that people can speak their ignorance and "facts" and think they really hit the nail in the coffin, when in fact it's clear for any rational person to see that all they achieved was the same all dung beetles achieve, they got to push their shit around for a while and stunk up the place with excrement.