[video=youtube;YKjPI6no5ng]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKjPI6no5ng[/video]
I agree though, black and white, well defined parameters should work in most cases and courts can handle the rest. I agree with protecting property, but where is the line drawn? This is a great point you made, and I'm glad you made it, because the current system needs to be fixed. That is actually the point of this whole rant. Now the debate can make progress, the way I see it, we are on the same page, even if our views aren't parallel. That just means contrasting views can produce real ideas.
The way I see it, if you have employees who toil more than you do making you rich and building your half trillion dollar enterprise, should their children not get something when they die? If you control a significant market share, should you be able to continually acquire more and keep it in your family? Should someone inherit such power? That isn't exactly being created equal, that is being created more powerful than others and certainly more wealthy. I don't claim to have all the answers, but I think a lot of progress can be made in this direction.