school shooting taft california

spandy

Well-Known Member
You don't like quick cars? I thought for sure you were going to say lifted trucks, but I guess people who can afford a nicer car than you are also now compensating... lol
No I'm poor. I had to buy a 9 year old 360. Fuck my life.
 

iSmokealottaweed

Active Member
the crowd that clings to killing tools because they're cowering and shaking in their boots are calling me a little girl?

oh, the irony.
Should we ban cars since they can also be considered "killing tools" if not used properly? The powers above want you to give up weapons so their gonna flood the media with horror stories in hopes you'll forget it takes an actual PERSON to pull the trigger and guns dont shoot themselves. We need to ban TV before anything else. It's a psychological burden on the country as a whole. Promotes nothing but an overly paranoid judgmental society that wants to point the finger everywhere but at themselves and leaves a feeling of hopelessness.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Should we ban cars since they can also be considered "killing tools" if not used properly? The powers above want you to give up weapons so their gonna flood the media with horror stories in hopes you'll forget it takes an actual PERSON to pull the trigger and guns dont shoot themselves. We need to ban TV before anything else. It's a psychological burden on the country as a whole. Promotes nothing but an overly paranoid judgmental society that wants to point the finger everywhere but at themselves and leaves a feeling of hopelessness.
But doesn't seem to comprehend the whole gun/condom analogy; it's better to have one and not need it, than need one and not have it.

I guess Buck would be happy enough to watch his wife get raped and then have them shoot him/her or worse...

Sadly there's fucked up people in the world, good luck to them if they try come a-rapin' in my house.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Should we ban cars since they can also be considered "killing tools" if not used properly? The powers above want you to give up weapons so their gonna flood the media with horror stories in hopes you'll forget it takes an actual PERSON to pull the trigger and guns dont shoot themselves. We need to ban TV before anything else. It's a psychological burden on the country as a whole. Promotes nothing but an overly paranoid judgmental society that wants to point the finger everywhere but at themselves and leaves a feeling of hopelessness.

go hunting this weekend with a car and tell me what you get.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
But doesn't seem to comprehend the whole gun/condom analogy; it's better to have one and not need it, than need one and not have it.

I guess Buck would be happy enough to watch his wife get raped and then have them shoot him/her or worse...

Sadly there's fucked up people in the world, good luck to them if they try come a-rapin' in my house.
silly retarded emotional appeal.

any normal handgun can defend against that, as could a dog and an axe.*

you yourself talked about how most home invaders are there to get your stuff, not rape and kill.

i guess you're just trying to troll me, oh well. unless you regularly have 20 people coming to rape your wife, you don't need an AR15 with 100 rounds in a drum.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
silly retarded emotional appeal.

any normal handgun can defend against that, as could a dog and an axe.*

you yourself talked about how most home invaders are there to get your stuff, not rape and kill.

i guess you're just trying to troll me, oh well. unless you regularly have 20 people coming to rape your wife, you don't need an AR15 with 100 rounds in a drum.
One doesn't need to have regular attacks on himself in order to justify superior force.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
silly retarded emotional appeal.

any normal handgun can defend against that, as could a dog and an axe.*

you yourself talked about how most home invaders are there to get your stuff, not rape and kill.

i guess you're just trying to troll me, oh well. unless you regularly have 20 people coming to rape your wife, you don't need an AR15 with 100 rounds in a drum.
By the same logic you don't need money, food or to pay taxes.

You don't need an axe to defend your house either, but it certainly more efficient than bare hands isn't it?

What do you have against someone wanting to be more efficient at defending their family/home?

Why are you saying a handgun could do the same job as an AR 15, yet advocate for handguns and demonise AR's?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
One doesn't need to have regular attacks on himself in order to justify superior force.
LOL!

except that was EXACTLY how you justified it.

who said this?

I find it very convenient to have a large magazine capacity when target shooting or when being attacked by multiple assailants.


 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
LOL!

except that was EXACTLY how you justified it.

who said this?

I find it very convenient to have a large magazine capacity when target shooting or when being attacked by multiple assailants.


You misread that, get your eyes tested old man.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
By the same logic you don't need money, food or to pay taxes.

You don't need an axe to defend your house either, but it certainly more efficient than bare hands isn't it?
yep. and a handgun is even better. an AR15? overkill.

What do you have against someone wanting to be more efficient at defending their family/home?

Why are you saying a handgun could do the same job as an AR 15, yet advocate for handguns and demonise AR's?
handguns and AR15s both fire deadly projectiles.

what i have against one rather than the other is their efficiency with respect to wiping out a classroom full of kindergarteners.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
do advise me, i'm not going to guess at what is rattling through your whiskey-addled brain :razz:
He was saying one doesn't have to be regularly attacked to justify the ability to defend against a large attack.

Your military spends how much retaining those THOUSANDS of nuclear weapons? More than could destroy the planet what? Ten times over?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
He was saying one doesn't have to be regularly attacked to justify the ability to defend against a large attack.
except that was exactly how he justified it. you did, too. remember when you asked me about "what if 11 people intrude?", or something to that effect?

keep your arguments straight and maybe i won't complete the circle for you guys.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
He was saying one doesn't have to be regularly attacked to justify the ability to defend against a large attack.

Your military spends how much retaining those THOUSANDS of nuclear weapons? More than could destroy the planet what? Ten times over?
also, thanks for clarifying. sincerely. :)
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
yep. and a handgun is even better. an AR15? overkill.



handguns and AR15s both fire deadly projectiles.

what i have against one rather than the other is their efficiency with respect to wiping out a classroom full of kindergarteners.
Cops shot how many bystanders in New York? 9?

Guess what type of guns they were using? Handguns.

Handguns can mow down children too you know.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
except that was exactly how he justified it. you did, too. remember when you asked me about "what if 11 people intrude?", or something to that effect?

keep your arguments straight and maybe i won't complete the circle for you guys.
And what if 11 people did? Why does the military stockpile ammunition?

Just incase.

You just don't get the condom analogy, I guess it's cos your wife won't "give it up".

You can go back to your Libtard fapping now.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
I find it funny that Buck equates having more than one person attack you as being regularly attacked. I thought that to be regularly attacked meant on more than one occasion. Damn, what does Alabama State University teach these young morons today?
 
Top