school shooting taft california

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
that's Nagasaki and Hiroshima after having 1 bomb dropped on each of them.

you don't have to take out the world just the major cities. focusing mainly on the shipping ports. once you do this the supply chain becomes broken and all the smaller cities start dying off. i'm pretty sure there is more than enough nukes on the planet to destroy life as we now know it.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
that's Nagasaki and Hiroshima after having 1 bomb dropped on each of them.

you don't have to take out the world just the major cities. focusing mainly on the shipping ports. once you do this the supply chain becomes broken and all the smaller cities start dying off. i'm pretty sure there is more than enough nukes on the planet to destroy life as we now know it.
You can destroy economies, yes, but the species? Not enough power there. Ruining civilization is not the same as destroying the world. cn
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
You can destroy economies, yes, but the species? Not enough power there. Ruining civilization is not the same as destroying the world. cn

that's Nagasaki and Hiroshima after having 1 bomb dropped on each of them.

you don't have to take out the world just the major cities. focusing mainly on the shipping ports. once you do this the supply chain becomes broken and all the smaller cities start dying off. i'm pretty sure there is more than enough nukes on the planet to destroy life as we now know it.
you're too busy playing with all your big words that you overlook all the simple ones. ;)
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Fallout isn't enough to sterilize a swath of land. You can't even spot Chernobyl from space. cn
It's enough to end people tho, should you launch all your nukes.

That to me is effectively "the end of the world" or whatever.

Sorry for the confusion.
 
Top