Monsanto cannabis yes or no? The DNA Protection Act of 2013

Genetically Engineered Cannabis yes or no?


  • Total voters
    369

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
im not worried enough to spend my time advocating for that just as i see no point putting a sign on the inside of peoples front doors telling them how dangerous its is to scare them unnecessarily without evidence to support doing so

and dont forget this thread is specifically about banning it outright


the beans from your garden is no proof either as theres many factors contributing to the taste

the main one is the very short amount of time it takes going from plant to your plate
i had no idea that my pointing out the inability to know all there is to know yet and the obvious physiological differences i feel when consuming local over GMO was akin to hanging a paranoid sign in your house by the front door.

small, organic farmers here in the US just got shafted in the fiscal cliff negotiations while larger, monied interests who are completely reliant on GMO kept their subsidies. have you heard them crying about it?

if anything, we'd subsidize what we know is healthy until the jury is out on GMO. it is what it is, but my voice is going to the proven underdogs over the GMOs. an examination of how our farming has evolved over the last 50 or so years can be alarming. a lot of change in a short time, with little real knowledge about its long term effects.
 

Krondizzel

New Member
i had no idea that my pointing out the inability to know all there is to know yet and the obvious physiological differences i feel when consuming local over GMO was akin to hanging a paranoid sign in your house by the front door.

small, organic farmers here in the US just got shafted in the fiscal cliff negotiations while larger, monied interests who are completely reliant on GMO kept their subsidies. have you heard them crying about it?

if anything, we'd subsidize what we know is healthy until the jury is out on GMO. it is what it is, but my voice is going to the proven underdogs over the GMOs. an examination of how our farming has evolved over the last 50 or so years can be alarming. a lot of change in a short time, with little real knowledge about its long term effects.
You have no idea what I am capable of.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
i had no idea that my pointing out the inability to know all there is to know yet and the obvious physiological differences i feel when consuming local over GMO was akin to hanging a paranoid sign in your house by the front door.

small, organic farmers here in the US just got shafted in the fiscal cliff negotiations while larger, monied interests who are completely reliant on GMO kept their subsidies. have you heard them crying about it?

if anything, we'd subsidize what we know is healthy until the jury is out on GMO. it is what it is, but my voice is going to the proven underdogs over the GMOs. an examination of how our farming has evolved over the last 50 or so years can be alarming. a lot of change in a short time, with little real knowledge about its long term effects.
if its not labeled then what tells you your eating GMO over local?

yes i hear the small "organic" farmers crying alot about it

mainly in the form of demonising GMO food with made up stories and bunk "studies"
 

Ninjabowler

Well-Known Member
have you not read this thread yet? i can tell you its a thrilling dire warning from the anti GMO about the catastrophic consequences that might just might happen yet they cannot find evidence to show
Remember when those people were having allergic reactions to fish genes in theyre tomatos?? Didnt some of them die? I cant remember, can you?

the OP of this very thread, his crowd of anti-GMO bandwagon riders, and in fact all the anti-GMO cassandras in this thread.

DOZENS of nightmare scenarios
DOZENS of doomsday prophesies
DOZENS of cries that SOMETHING be done to protect us from an imaginary threat

ZERO evidence to support their claims.

read this thread and youll learn all you need to know.
This thread has gone on wayy to long, i believe because of you. You remind me of the monsanto hitler. I still cant believe someone with your intellegence can have such skewed ideals on genetics. A tomato grown in my garden is better than one grown by commercial growers. How many fucking pages is it going to take to get you to admit it???
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
Remember when those people were having allergic reactions to fish genes in theyre tomatos?? Didnt some of them die? I cant remember, can you?
you mean the tomatoes that were never commercialised? well they must have been damn toxic to kill people who never had a chance to eat them


This thread has gone on wayy to long, i believe because of you. You remind me of the monsanto hitler. I still cant believe someone with your intellegence can have such skewed ideals on genetics. A tomato grown in my garden is better than one grown by commercial growers. How many fucking pages is it going to take to get you to admit it???
what the fuck has any of that got to do with GMO?

commercial farmers grow mostly for bulk whether or not the use GMO to do so

you can grow mostly for taste so you can pick the breed that tastes better


look at it this way you get commercial growers of weed that will happily grow a "big bud" style of weed that doesnt get you so high but gives massive yeilds

you grow for your own personal weed and you can choose the connoisseur plants that you enjoy the most
none of that is to do with gmo
 

Ninjabowler

Well-Known Member
have you not read this thread yet? i can tell you its a thrilling dire warning from the anti GMO about the catastrophic consequences that might just might happen yet they cannot find evidence to show
the OP of this very thread, his crowd of anti-GMO bandwagon riders, and in fact all the anti-GMO cassandras in this thread.

DOZENS of nightmare scenarios
DOZENS of doomsday prophesies
DOZENS of cries that SOMETHING be done to protect us from an imaginary threat

ZERO evidence to support their claims.

read this thread and youll learn all you need to know.
you mean the tomatoes that were never commercialised? well they must have been damn toxic to kill people who never had a chance to eat them




what the fuck has any of that got to do with GMO?

commercial farmers grow mostly for bulk whether or not the use GMO to do so

you can grow mostly for taste so you can pick the breed that tastes better


look at it this way you get commercial growers of weed that will happily grow a "big bud" style of weed that doesnt get you so high but gives massive yeilds

you grow for your own personal weed and you can choose the connoisseur plants that you enjoy the most
none of that is to do with gmo
So you know the tomatos that were geneticly modified that im talking about then?
Um yes i doooo lmao :lol:
next...
When you go in favor of commercial growing practices you loose the quality of your crop, dont tell me this makes no sence to you, you just posted it. Add that to the way our farming practices are shifting ttward, which is GMO and wheres the quality go? Out the damn window, thats where. And i have you and monsanto hitler claiming this is not going to happen and monsanto rocks. Blablabla, you tards keep rockin this thread just to argue, nobody cares anymore, we know your wrong.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
if its not labeled then what tells you your eating GMO over local?
i can visit the farm if i'd like (and often do!).

it's a bit of a hassle though, and more costly to boycott GMO foods (th the best extent possible). i'd rather just see it out there for the consumer to see plainly. i mean, GMO producers have nothing to fear by labeling their product as such, do they?

yes i hear the small "organic" farmers crying alot about it

mainly in the form of demonising GMO food with made up stories and bunk "studies"
i doubt that anyone on this thread was just shafted by the fiscal cliff slam. you'd probably have heard them say so by now.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
So you know the tomatos that were geneticly modified that im talking about then?
yes they were developed to resist frost under tests it showed that it didnt work the project was crapped and they never saw the shelves

so your hysterical propagander about them killing people is just plain nonsense

Um yes i doooo lmao :lol:
huh you do what?
next...
When you go in favor of commercial growing practices you loose the quality of your crop, dont tell me this makes no sence to you, you just posted it. Add that to the way our farming practices are shifting ttward, which is GMO and wheres the quality go? Out the damn window, thats where. And i have you and monsanto hitler claiming this is not going to happen and monsanto rocks. Blablabla, you tards keep rockin this thread just to argue, nobody cares anymore, we know your wrong.
taste =/= equal nutritional value

and to your tomato reference you do realise that GMO tomatoes are not sold in the usa anymore?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
look at it this way you get commercial growers of weed that will happily grow a "big bud" style of weed that doesnt get you so high but gives massive yeilds

you grow for your own personal weed and you can choose the connoisseur plants that you enjoy the most
none of that is to do with gmo
if that ever happened to cannabis, that would be welcome. i'd still love to see a label to know where and how my cannabis came from.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
taste =/= equal nutritional value
i would beg to differ. i have no sense of smell, so a large part of how i evaluate my food (fuel) is how i feel after i eat it. there's a certain taste and feel to eating natural, well cooked food over any sort of processed, GMO crap.

i am a bit of a food snob though.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
i can visit the farm if i'd like (and often do!).
and the farmer tells you that its GMO peas he's growing rather than natural?

if not im curious without the labelling how you can tell

it's a bit of a hassle though, and more costly to boycott GMO foods (th the best extent possible). i'd rather just see it out there for the consumer to see plainly. i mean, GMO producers have nothing to fear by labeling their product as such, do they?
why not have natural organic producers put a "guaranteed GMO free" label on their produce?

theres a propaganda campaign based on fear against GMO all labelling does is gives that campaign legitimacy when theres no evidence to support it

organic produce labelled "GMO FREE" allows people to choose does it not?






i doubt that anyone on this thread was just shafted by the fiscal cliff slam. you'd probably have heard them say so by now.
well im sure some the articles C+P'd here have their origins

and the fiscal cliff has hit small business everywhere not just in farming this side argument of yours is specious
 

Ninjabowler

Well-Known Member
yes they were developed to resist frost under tests it showed that it didnt work the project was crapped and they never saw the shelves

so your hysterical propagander about them killing people is just plain nonsense


huh you do what?

taste =/= equal nutritional value

and to your tomato reference you do realise that GMO tomatoes are not sold in the usa anymore?
Ok your right.......all food eaten by the people of the world should be geneticlly modified and mass produced. I also think that monsanto should run everything so their monopoly over the american consumers dollar can produce more geneticlly modified food.
:)
:)
:)
this is by far the stupidest thing ive ever written...and you two blubbering baffoons actually belive it. Bahahahahaaaa, take your degree and burn it you try hards.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
i would beg to differ. i have no sense of smell, so a large part of how i evaluate my food (fuel) is how i feel after i eat it. there's a certain taste and feel to eating natural, well cooked food over any sort of processed, GMO crap.

i am a bit of a food snob though.
anecdotal subjective experience =/= data come on buck you should be better than that
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
Ok your right.......all food eaten by the people of the world should be geneticlly modified and mass produced. I also think that monsanto should run everything so their monopoly over the american consumers dollar can produce more geneticlly modified food.
:)
:)
:)
this is by far the stupidest thing ive ever written...and you two blubbering baffoons actually belive it. Bahahahahaaaa, take your degree and burn it you try hards.
i think this is fitting for your post
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
Ok your right.......all food eaten by the people of the world should be geneticlly modified and mass produced. I also think that monsanto should run everything so their monopoly over the american consumers dollar can produce more geneticlly modified food.
:)
:)
:)
this is by far the stupidest thing ive ever written...and you two blubbering baffoons actually belive it. Bahahahahaaaa, take your degree and burn it you try hards.
By your lack of an intellegent answer and your resorting to comedy to win I would say that your conceding and you belive my entire post and cant argue any of it. Thread closed, thanks for comin out monsanto employees :lol:
answer to what exactly? where in that rant of yours was there a question?

you spat your dummy out and i gave the appropriate response
 

Ninjabowler

Well-Known Member
answer to what exactly? where in that rant of yours was there a question?

you spat your dummy out and i gave the appropriate response
You dont need a question to respond do you? (Theres a question you can answer simply)
do you not have a response to my statement? Should i repost it or are you going to just post more pictures of why you two monsanto employees are still rockin this thread after 100 pages of the same arguement. Waaaaaah...they called our bosses genetic butchers!
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
Ok your right.......all food eaten by the people of the world should be geneticlly modified and mass produced. I also think that monsanto should run everything so their monopoly over the american consumers dollar can produce more geneticlly modified food.
:)
:)
:)
this is by far the stupidest thing ive ever written...and you two blubbering baffoons actually belive it. Bahahahahaaaa, take your degree and burn it you try hards.
You dont need a question to respond do you? (Theres a question you can answer simply)
do you not have a response to my statement? Should i repost it or are you going to just post more pictures of why you two monsanto employees are still rockin this thread after 100 pages of the same arguement. Waaaaaah...they called our bosses genetic butchers!
please can you point out the part of the post that you thought was cogent and you consider deserves a reply rather than dismissal for being the childish rant i see
 

Ninjabowler

Well-Known Member
please can you point out the part of the post that you thought was cogent and you consider deserves a reply rather than dismissal for being the childish rant i see
Are you blind?? The whole first paragraph says it all, if i were to tell you that you were right and i was wrong, thats exactly what it would sound like. Do you agree with that statement?...................Or is this just a facade so you can argue every night, night after night?
 
Top