Looks like Obama's appointment were illegal

C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Additionally, Friday’s decision casts doubt on hundreds of decisions the NLRB has made in the past year, ranging from enforcement of collective-bargaining agreements to rulings on the rights of workers to use social media.



Yeah another win for the average working american
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Holding up appointments just to cripple an agency is not goverment working
Congress has a duty to look at Appointments the President suggests. They are not doing this not out of a sense of duty. But to Cripple the goverment.

Do you know what the NLRB does?
Click to expand...
The govt works the way they say. It's the rules of the Legislature. I don't care. The System rights itself. And it's the way we say, base on the Constitution since we elect "them" from among "us." It matters not to me what the Labor Relations board is suppose to do. Some good some bad, I imagine. Par for the course. I'm not taking sides.

And I will also point out that the intent in the Adversarial System is to cripple the other side.
 
Winter Woman

Winter Woman

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Additionally, Friday’s decision casts doubt on hundreds of decisions the NLRB has made in the past year, ranging from enforcement of collective-bargaining agreements to rulings on the rights of workers to use social media.



Yeah another win for the average working american
Click to expand...
You know it does feel soooo gooooood.
 
st0wandgrow

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
Winter Woman said:
LMAO. Oh this does feel sooooo good.

He appointments were illegal.

In a case freighted with major constitutional implications, a federal appeals court on Friday overturned President Obama’s controversial recess appointments from last year, ruling he abused his powers and acted when the Senate was not actually in a recess.
The three-judge panel’s ruling is a major blow to Mr. Obama. The judges ruled that the appointments Mr. Obama made to the National Labor Relations Board are illegal, and the board no longer has a quorum to operate.
But the ruling has even broader constitutional significance, with the judges arguing that the president’s recess appointment powers don’t apply to “intrasession” appointments — those made when Congress has left town for a few days or weeks.
The judges signaled the power only applies after Congress has adjourned sine die, which is a legislative term of art that signals the end to a long work period. In modern times, it means the president could only use his powers when Congress quits business at the end of a year.
Click to expand...
It feels so good?

Why is that?

I will never understand this us vs them mentality in this country. People like you *want* to see the President fail. You get off on it. Your own selfish interests are placed before what's best for the country, but you consider yourself a "patriot" .... flying your flag proudly on your front porch.
 
Winter Woman

Winter Woman

Well-Known Member
st0wandgrow said:
It feels so good?

Why is that?

I will never understand this us vs them mentality in this country. People like you *want* to see the President fail. You get off on it. Your own selfish interests are placed before what's best for the country, but you consider yourself a "patriot" .... flying your flag proudly on your front porch.
Click to expand...
Nah, it was just to rub in on ChesusRice. I remember him and UB doing it to me and a few others that don't tow their line.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Those were legal apparently....we will see. Much of the bureaucracy is headless right now. It's the lack of appoints that seems more interesting.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
st0wandgrow said:
It feels so good?

Why is that?

I will never understand this us vs them mentality in this country. People like you *want* to see the President fail. You get off on it. Your own selfish interests are placed before what's best for the country, but you consider yourself a "patriot" .... flying your flag proudly on your front porch.
Click to expand...
So, let me get this straight. You supported George W Bush in his presidency, right?
 
nontheist

nontheist

Well-Known Member
st0wandgrow said:
It feels so good?

Why is that?

I will never understand this us vs them mentality in this country. People like you *want* to see the President fail. You get off on it. Your own selfish interests are placed before what's best for the country, but you consider yourself a "patriot" .... flying your flag proudly on your front porch.
Click to expand...
Nice statement but you and your libtard friends are chasing gun laws that are in the hundredths of a percent in actual killings. Liberal priorities are always fucked up and why no one takes you guys seriously. The backlash comes from anything you are capable of trying to do gets fuck up in the extreme and someone has to clean up the mess.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
nontheist said:
Nice statement but you and your libtard friends are chasing gun laws that are in the hundredths of a percent in actual killings. Liberal priorities are always fucked up and why no one takes you guys seriously. The backlash comes from anything you are capable of trying to do gets fuck up in the extreme and someone has to clean up the mess.
Click to expand...
sock puppet returns!

are you behind the other sock too?
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Mark G. Pearce, the N.L.R.B.’s chairman, said the board “respectfully disagrees with today’s decision and believes that the president’s position in the matter will ultimately be upheld.” He noted that similar questions about the recess appointments had been raised in more than a dozen cases pending in other courts of appeals. Among the decisions that could be vacated are three recent rulings in which the board has assumed a powerful role in telling companies that they cannot issue blanket prohibitions on what their employees can say on Facebook, Twitter and other social media.

Awesome
Winter woman is all for Corporate facism

Cheer on WW maybe your employer will decide large women shouold get paid less and the NLRB wont be able to help you out
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Instead, they held pro forma sessions, meaning a member came into the nearly empty chamber every third day and banged the gavel. The idea was that the novel tactic would legally break up the long recess into a series of short ones believed to be too brief for recess appointments.

Under Mr. Obama, Republicans turned the tables by using the power of the House to block the Senate from adjourning for more than three days. But last January, Mr. Obama decided to challenge the new tactic by declaring the pro forma sessions a sham and appointing the three labor board members, along with Mr. Cordray.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Winter Woman said:
Obama appointed even though the Senate was in 'pro forma' session. That is why it is illegal. Don't you read?
Click to expand...
So you are ok with corporate facism and Pro forma congressional sessions where a senator bangs a gavel to an empty chamber?

I see It's ok to be dishonest if you are a republican
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top