Monsanto cannabis yes or no? The DNA Protection Act of 2013

[UncleBuck]

how do you account for the jewish allergies? is it to do with their food?

more to do with our human genetics.

you know that jews are inferior beings, right?

but really, now that i've humored your distraction, let's see if we can't answer the question.

 

[ginjawarrior]

more to do with our human genetics.

you know that jews are inferior beings, right?

but really, now that i've humored your distraction, let's see if we can't answer the question.

what the question about why you think its reasonable to squeeze GMO into into everything bad even tho its unrelated?

 

[UncleBuck]

what the question about why you think its reasonable to squeeze GMO into into everything bad even tho its unrelated?

why are you dodging the question if there is nothing wrong or bad about GMOs and associated practices?

 

[ginjawarrior]

why are you dodging the question if there is nothing wrong or bad about GMOs and associated practices?

factory style farming started in the usa in the 1930's fattening up animals was practiced well before GMO ever existed

why do you think its reasonable to blame that practice on GMO?

if you want a discussion on other aspects of farming start a thread on it

stop conflating separate issues to try and bolster your weak stance

 

[UncleBuck]

factory style farming started in the usa in the 1930's fattening up animals was practiced well before GMO ever existed

why do you think its reasonable to blame that practice on GMO?

if you want a discussion on other aspects of farming start a thread on it

stop conflating separate issues to try and bolster your weak stance

so grain fed cattle are not more common since the rise of GMOs? is that what you're saying? all innocent, no relation?

 

[ginjawarrior]

so grain fed cattle are not more common since the rise of GMOs? is that what you're saying? all innocent, no relation?

correlation =/= causation

come on now buck this is playground level your at right now

 

[UncleBuck]

correlation =/= causation

come on now buck this is playground level your at right now

i'll take correlation.

i just love the new model of farming they're working on. as i said before...

hey bob, what if we fattened our cows up quicker by doing X?

cool sounds good.

oops, solution X creates problem Y.

fixed it! made solution Z for problem Y.

oops, solution Z creates problem A.

fixed it! solution B fixes problem A.

oops, solution B creates problem C.

fixed it! solution D fixes problem C.

genius! let's subsidize it all!

 

[ginjawarrior]

i'll take correlation.

i just love the new model of farming they're working on. as i said before...

hey bob, what if we fattened our cows up quicker by doing X?

cool sounds good.

oops, solution X creates problem Y.

fixed it! made solution Z for problem Y.

oops, solution Z creates problem A.

fixed it! solution B fixes problem A.

oops, solution B creates problem C.

fixed it! solution D fixes problem C.

genius! let's subsidize it all!

so we're still in recess then?

may as well play

 

[echelon1k1]

have you read these studies you just posted? because just looking at the first one it does not support your case

secrecy? not letting people near the seeds? havent you just posted studies of people using the seeds?

your all over the place perhaps you need to go back to hating your NON GMO tomatoes for being GMO

Surprise Surprise the fuckin retard can't read... The studies show the effects of GM food on mice - soy & corn in particular.

GM crops themselves were not the focus of the study as BioTech companies have explicit clauses in their contracts/agreements with farmers that prohibit the use of GM seeds or crops in scientific testing. This is why any long term, independent studies are rare.

Do you eat GM food yourself or you just happy to believe whatever the "sound & piture box" tells you?

 

[UncleBuck]

so we're still in recess then?

i agree, the new method of farming seems to have been conceived by retarded 7 year olds playing an endless game of tag.

create a problem and pat yourself on the back for fixing what doesn't even need to exist in the first place.

besides, my body does better with monsanto's GMO rBGH and the ensuing problems it creates within me are another person's job security!

i like this new method of farming!

 

[ginjawarrior]

i agree, the new method of farming seems to have been conceived by retarded 7 year olds playing an endless game of tag.

create a problem and pat yourself on the back for fixing what doesn't even need to exist in the first place.

besides, my body does better with monsanto's GMO rBGH and the ensuing problems it creates within me are another person's job security!

i like this new method of farming!

gmo aside this new style of farming (green revolution) has meant we can now support 7 billion+ people personally i think thats a good thing

yes it has caused some problems like fertilizer run off and over use of pesticide/ herbicide which is harmful to the environment

gmo is starting to solve those problems meaning feeding 7 billion + people isnt such a drain on the environment


i wait with great anticipation what wonders 7 billion + minds bring to humanity the small base of europe and america has brought us a small way but we havent seen nothing yet....

 

[ginjawarrior]

Surprise Surprise the fuckin retard can't read... The studies show the effects of GM food on mice - soy & corn in particular.

GM crops themselves were not the focus of the study as BioTech companies have explicit clauses in their contracts/agreements with farmers that prohibit the use of GM seeds or crops in scientific testing. This is why any long term, independent studies are rare.

Do you eat GM food yourself or you just happy to believe whatever the "sound & piture box" tells you?

if you'd read this thread at all you would have seen those studies to be exposed as the bunk they are time and time again

 

[echelon1k1]

gmo aside this new style of farming (green revolution) has meant we can now support 7 billion+ people personally i think thats a good thing

That's probably one of the most stupid statements i've ever read...

WTF???? What's your definition of support? Because this planet may be home to nearly 7 billion, but this planet does not support 7 billion. Unless you consider poverty & famine an acceptable standard of living...

In addition to your english second language course - stop skipping history...

 

[echelon1k1]

if you'd read this thread at all you would have seen those studies to be exposed as the bunk they are time and time again

Seralinis study isn't there... Keep showing off your ignorance...

Again Do you eat GM food yourself? Or you just happy playing dumb harpo?

 

[UncleBuck]

gmo aside this new style of farming (green revolution) has meant we can now support 7 billion+ people personally i think thats a good thing

yes it has caused some problems like fertilizer run off and over use of pesticide/ herbicide which is harmful to the environment

gmo is starting to solve those problems meaning feeding 7 billion + people isnt such a drain on the environment


i wait with great anticipation what wonders 7 billion + minds bring to humanity the small base of europe and america has brought us a small way but we havent seen nothing yet....

not to get all preachy, but don't these talking monkeys know that eden has enough to go around?

we already have enough to feed 7 billion people, but we need our mcdonald's burgers.*

and GMO is good for the environment? could have fooled me!

 

[ginjawarrior]

That's probably one of the most stupid statements i've ever read...

WTF???? What's your definition of support? Because this planet may be home to nearly 7 billion, but this planet does not support 7 billion. Unless you consider poverty & famine an acceptable standard of living...

In addition to your english second language course - stop skipping history...

oh there certainly is a problem with the distribution model we are currently operating under

and as you should have noted i made no comment as to poverty just "support" theres 7 billion + people and the number is growing day by day

if the planet wasn't supoorting that number it would be dropping day by day would it not?

what part of history have i missed?

 

[UncleBuck]

oh there certainly is a problem with the distribution model we are currently operating under

and as you should have noted i made no comment as to poverty just "support" theres 7 billion + people and the number is growing day by day

if the planet wasn't supoorting that number it would be dropping day by day would it not?

what part of history have i missed?

if your goal is to sustain as many people as possible, give up beef.

 

[ginjawarrior]

not to get all preachy, but don't these talking monkeys know that eden has enough to go around?

we already have enough to feed 7 billion people, but we need our mcdonald's burgers.*

and GMO is good for the environment? could have fooled me!

unless those are GMO cows why are you conflating again?

its late here what are you trying to say about those monkeys?

 

[ginjawarrior]

if your goal is to sustain as many people as possible, give up beef.

........?

yes meat production uses more resources in its production

but telling me to give up meat does what exactly?

 

[UncleBuck]

unless those are GMO cows why are you conflating again?

lol, yeah.

they jam pack their cows in those areas and then don't pump them full of growth hormones, antibiotics, and GMO grains. didn't you see the lovely pasture area they get to feed on?

its late here what are you trying to say about those monkeys?

it's a maynard line.

the fact is that we, right now, can feed all 7 billion people on this planet if we chose to. we choose to eat beef instead. do you know how many people you could feed and for how long with the amount of food we use to fatten one cow?