Monsanto cannabis yes or no? The DNA Protection Act of 2013

Genetically Engineered Cannabis yes or no?

  • Total voters
    369
UncleBuck said:
more to do with our human genetics.

you know that jews are inferior beings, right?

but really, now that i've humored your distraction, let's see if we can't answer the question.
Click to expand...

what the question about why you think its reasonable to squeeze GMO into into everything bad even tho its unrelated?
 
UncleBuck said:
why are you dodging the question if there is nothing wrong or bad about GMOs and associated practices?
Click to expand...

factory style farming started in the usa in the 1930's fattening up animals was practiced well before GMO ever existed

why do you think its reasonable to blame that practice on GMO?

if you want a discussion on other aspects of farming start a thread on it

stop conflating separate issues to try and bolster your weak stance
 
ginjawarrior said:
factory style farming started in the usa in the 1930's fattening up animals was practiced well before GMO ever existed

why do you think its reasonable to blame that practice on GMO?

if you want a discussion on other aspects of farming start a thread on it

stop conflating separate issues to try and bolster your weak stance
Click to expand...

so grain fed cattle are not more common since the rise of GMOs? is that what you're saying? all innocent, no relation?
 
ginjawarrior said:
correlation =/= causation

come on now buck this is playground level your at right now
Click to expand...

i'll take correlation.

i just love the new model of farming they're working on. as i said before...

hey bob, what if we fattened our cows up quicker by doing X?

cool sounds good.

oops, solution X creates problem Y.

fixed it! made solution Z for problem Y.

oops, solution Z creates problem A.

fixed it! solution B fixes problem A.

oops, solution B creates problem C.

fixed it! solution D fixes problem C.

genius! let's subsidize it all!
 
UncleBuck said:
i'll take correlation.

i just love the new model of farming they're working on. as i said before...

hey bob, what if we fattened our cows up quicker by doing X?

cool sounds good.

oops, solution X creates problem Y.

fixed it! made solution Z for problem Y.

oops, solution Z creates problem A.

fixed it! solution B fixes problem A.

oops, solution B creates problem C.

fixed it! solution D fixes problem C.

genius! let's subsidize it all!
Click to expand...

so we're still in recess then?

may as well play

correlation.png
 
ginjawarrior said:
have you read these studies you just posted? because just looking at the first one it does not support your case

secrecy? not letting people near the seeds? havent you just posted studies of people using the seeds?

your all over the place perhaps you need to go back to hating your NON GMO tomatoes for being GMO
Click to expand...

Surprise Surprise the fuckin retard can't read... The studies show the effects of GM food on mice - soy & corn in particular.

GM crops themselves were not the focus of the study as BioTech companies have explicit clauses in their contracts/agreements with farmers that prohibit the use of GM seeds or crops in scientific testing. This is why any long term, independent studies are rare.

Do you eat GM food yourself or you just happy to believe whatever the "sound & piture box" tells you?
 
ginjawarrior said:
so we're still in recess then?
Click to expand...

i agree, the new method of farming seems to have been conceived by retarded 7 year olds playing an endless game of tag.

create a problem and pat yourself on the back for fixing what doesn't even need to exist in the first place.

besides, my body does better with monsanto's GMO rBGH and the ensuing problems it creates within me are another person's job security!

i like this new method of farming!
 
UncleBuck said:
i agree, the new method of farming seems to have been conceived by retarded 7 year olds playing an endless game of tag.

create a problem and pat yourself on the back for fixing what doesn't even need to exist in the first place.

besides, my body does better with monsanto's GMO rBGH and the ensuing problems it creates within me are another person's job security!

i like this new method of farming!
Click to expand...

gmo aside this new style of farming (green revolution) has meant we can now support 7 billion+ people personally i think thats a good thing :)

yes it has caused some problems like fertilizer run off and over use of pesticide/ herbicide which is harmful to the environment :(

gmo is starting to solve those problems meaning feeding 7 billion + people isnt such a drain on the environment :)


i wait with great anticipation what wonders 7 billion + minds bring to humanity the small base of europe and america has brought us a small way but we havent seen nothing yet....
 
echelon1k1 said:
Surprise Surprise the fuckin retard can't read... The studies show the effects of GM food on mice - soy & corn in particular.

GM crops themselves were not the focus of the study as BioTech companies have explicit clauses in their contracts/agreements with farmers that prohibit the use of GM seeds or crops in scientific testing. This is why any long term, independent studies are rare.

Do you eat GM food yourself or you just happy to believe whatever the "sound & piture box" tells you?
Click to expand...
if you'd read this thread at all you would have seen those studies to be exposed as the bunk they are time and time again
 
ginjawarrior said:
gmo aside this new style of farming (green revolution) has meant we can now support 7 billion+ people personally i think thats a good thing :)
Click to expand...

That's probably one of the most stupid statements i've ever read...

WTF???? What's your definition of support? Because this planet may be home to nearly 7 billion, but this planet does not support 7 billion. Unless you consider poverty & famine an acceptable standard of living...

In addition to your english second language course - stop skipping history...
 
ginjawarrior said:
gmo aside this new style of farming (green revolution) has meant we can now support 7 billion+ people personally i think thats a good thing :)

yes it has caused some problems like fertilizer run off and over use of pesticide/ herbicide which is harmful to the environment :(

gmo is starting to solve those problems meaning feeding 7 billion + people isnt such a drain on the environment :)


i wait with great anticipation what wonders 7 billion + minds bring to humanity the small base of europe and america has brought us a small way but we havent seen nothing yet....
Click to expand...

not to get all preachy, but don't these talking monkeys know that eden has enough to go around?

we already have enough to feed 7 billion people, but we need our mcdonald's burgers.*

and GMO is good for the environment? could have fooled me!

feedlot.jpg
 
echelon1k1 said:
That's probably one of the most stupid statements i've ever read...

WTF???? What's your definition of support? Because this planet may be home to nearly 7 billion, but this planet does not support 7 billion. Unless you consider poverty & famine an acceptable standard of living...

In addition to your english second language course - stop skipping history...
Click to expand...

oh there certainly is a problem with the distribution model we are currently operating under

and as you should have noted i made no comment as to poverty just "support" theres 7 billion + people and the number is growing day by day

if the planet wasn't supoorting that number it would be dropping day by day would it not?

what part of history have i missed?
 
ginjawarrior said:
oh there certainly is a problem with the distribution model we are currently operating under

and as you should have noted i made no comment as to poverty just "support" theres 7 billion + people and the number is growing day by day

if the planet wasn't supoorting that number it would be dropping day by day would it not?

what part of history have i missed?
Click to expand...

if your goal is to sustain as many people as possible, give up beef.
 
UncleBuck said:
not to get all preachy, but don't these talking monkeys know that eden has enough to go around?

we already have enough to feed 7 billion people, but we need our mcdonald's burgers.*

and GMO is good for the environment? could have fooled me!

feedlot.jpg
Click to expand...

unless those are GMO cows why are you conflating again?

its late here what are you trying to say about those monkeys?
 
ginjawarrior said:
unless those are GMO cows why are you conflating again?
Click to expand...

lol, yeah.

they jam pack their cows in those areas and then don't pump them full of growth hormones, antibiotics, and GMO grains. didn't you see the lovely pasture area they get to feed on?

ginjawarrior said:
its late here what are you trying to say about those monkeys?
Click to expand...

it's a maynard line.

the fact is that we, right now, can feed all 7 billion people on this planet if we chose to. we choose to eat beef instead. do you know how many people you could feed and for how long with the amount of food we use to fatten one cow?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top