Police Break The Law, Marijuana in Texas

Status
Not open for further replies.
iiKode

iiKode

Well-Known Member
chuck estevez said:
sorry troll. not playing your troll game. you get no more attention from me as you are on ignore. good luck finding someone who gives a shit about your sad life.
Click to expand...
You are more of a troll, no journal posts and probably 400+ posts of shit talking and talking about shit you read, not experienced by yourself.
 
Totoe

Totoe

Well-Known Member
This thread is fucking hilarious. Fin, how old are you? You seem smart enough to do research but too stupid to read material and synthesize the ideas into what one might consider knowledge. Not a bad start if you are 18 or some shit, but I hope you are not thirty.



Ballard does not apply at all. If you are going to prove something then there is no need to invoke a law stating you do not have to prove your religion.

You're not going to be able to apply Lemon and claim mj as some type of sacrament. Ex. Rasta's cannot smoke mj either. Also Lemon mainly deals with showing favor to religion over another and therefore your attempt to claim the laws infringe upon your religious sacraments will not work. A D.A> will just point out how we do not allow tribal headhunters from Papua New Guinea free range to murder and eat people based on religious sacrament.

Who let the cops into your house?, or did they do a warrantless no-knock police raid? What did they use to establish PC (Probable Cause)?

McDaniel; you can't be fucking serious right? You broke the law and they are attempting to punish you for it, this is not the act of a capricious government, but rather a standard practice of the criminal justice system.

Babalu; you are making assertions that plants are fundamentally the same as animals based on an animal sacrifice, interesting, The D.A. calls his next witness, a biologist from the local university. But I get it you are saying plants should be part of religious sacrament too. It is still a schedule 1 drug, federally, thus subject to criminalization. All a prosecutor has to do is pull out the slippery slope doctrine and remind the judge that if you get to do a bong hit for religion then the next meth producer is making holy ice to get people closer to the Flash, god of speed.
 
Finshaggy

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Totoe said:
Who let the cops into your house?, or did they do a warrantless no-knock police raid? What did they use to establish PC (Probable Cause)?

McDaniel; you can't be fucking serious right? You broke the law and they are attempting to punish you for it, this is not the act of a capricious government, but rather a standard practice of the criminal justice system.

Babalu; you are making assertions that plants are fundamentally the same as animals based on an animal sacrifice, interesting, The D.A. calls his next witness, a biologist from the local university. But I get it you are saying plants should be part of religious sacrament too. It is still a schedule 1 drug, federally, thus subject to criminalization. All a prosecutor has to do is pull out the slippery slope doctrine and remind the judge that if you get to do a bong hit for religion then the next meth producer is making holy ice to get people closer to the Flash, god of speed.
Click to expand...
They let themselves in. Warrantless police raid on personal property. That alone wins me this case. And the Peyote case DOES NOT mean that NO drug can be used, that JUST means Peyote can't be used. If a Supreme Court Justice says that it can be used, then it can be used. THAT is how common law works, and the POLICE are in the wrong here, not me. SO I win this case no matter what, it's just, does the judge decide that there is no reason to bust in a house where people consume sacramental material. Because ALL the common aw points to them being in the wrong. And with the McDaniel case, I DID NOT break the law, so your argument is mute.
 
Finshaggy

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Totoe said:
All a prosecutor has to do is pull out the slippery slope doctrine and remind the judge that if you get to do a bong hit for religion then the next meth producer is making holy ice to get people closer to the Flash, god of speed.
Click to expand...
You don't know what you are talking about. There are rules for religion. If they were established prior to 1970-something they are valid religions. All NEWER religions are false. So "Flash the god of speed", would be completely UNCOMPARABLE to my case :dunce:
 
clayman187

clayman187

Active Member
I live in TX and saw something on the news the other day saying that Tx wants to tax you for MJ like the stamp on cigs...but wait a min..aint it illegal here? just another way to fine/charge you...state tax evasion?
 
Finshaggy

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
clayman187 said:
I live in TX and saw something on the news the other day saying that Tx wants to tax you for MJ like the stamp on cigs...but wait a min..aint it illegal here? just another way to fine/charge you...state tax evasion?
Click to expand...
If it were taxed it would be legal. The only reason it's illegal is because they can't tax it. If it has a tax sticker it's legal.
 
Figong

Figong

Well-Known Member
Saldaw said:
best of luck man i am currently living in indonesia where cops do not need warrents or to answer questions when they fuck up
Click to expand...
Have seen videos of Thai police too, caning someone within an inch of their life for trying to steal a car.. police batons w/blades is semi-overkill for stealing a car.
 
Totoe

Totoe

Well-Known Member
Finshaggy said:
You don't know what you are talking about. There are rules for religion. If they were established prior to 1970-something they are valid religions. All NEWER religions are false. So "Flash the god of speed", would be completely UNCOMPARABLE to my case :dunce:
Click to expand...
So the bastardized religion you created from fruit of the gods and a hindu scripture does not count either, dipshit. Your best bet is going to be if you are right that they did a warrantless no-knock, but I would guess that they are going to come up with some sort of PC for the raid anyways.
 
Totoe

Totoe

Well-Known Member
Finshaggy said:
They let themselves in. Warrantless police raid on personal property. That alone wins me this case. And the Peyote case DOES NOT mean that NO drug can be used, that JUST means Peyote can't be used. If a Supreme Court Justice says that it can be used, then it can be used. THAT is how common law works, and the POLICE are in the wrong here, not me. SO I win this case no matter what, it's just, does the judge decide that there is no reason to bust in a house where people consume sacramental material. Because ALL the common aw points to them being in the wrong. And with the McDaniel case, I DID NOT break the law, so your argument is mute.
Click to expand...

A. you need 5 supreme court justices not one.
B. The drug in question of the case Peyote is not what I mean, they will apply the denial of peyote use to all illegal drugs as religious sacraments
C. Rastafarianism is older than 40 years and you cannot grow dreadlocks and smoke weed claiming it as a religious sacrament, so you cannot bastardize eastern religions with the same intent.
D. If you plan to seriously fight this and win, hire a lawyer who is sympathetic to your cause. go to norml.org or something because the DA is gonna destroy you. Its really simple, think in terms of athletics. you can't read a few books on how to play basketball then go beat even the 14th man for the toronto raptors, likewise two lexisnexus searches are not going to enable you to defeat a DA and a probably biased-already Texas judge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top