"Burn that fucking house down!"

Grandpapy

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
Fungus Gnat said:
Three people were shot at by the lapd for driving trucks that the scared cops thought resembled Dorner's. They shot on sight.
Click to expand...
I moved here to CA 28 years ago when my dad was dying of cancer.
The first thing he told me before I even started to un-pack, was if I ever get pulled over driving, "Keep your hands where they can see them", "They will shoot you". I'm like "WTF??" lol, he just gave me that look, you know, raised eyebrow, slight tilt of the head. Even at 25 I was quite naive.
 
Winter Woman

Winter Woman

Well-Known Member
Dorner was accused of killing a couple of the men in blue. They had him cornered and could have waited him out. We all know what happened. He deserved a fair trial.

First they came for Dorner...
 
J

jtprin

Well-Known Member
ClaytonBigsby said:
"Burn that MF!" "Burn it, burn it, burn it"

is what the San Bernadino County Sheriff's yelled at each other before burning Dorner alive. He said they would kill him on sight, and he was right. This makes ALL cops suspect and I don;t know how any court can disregard reports of abuse and corruption. This was cop murder.
Click to expand...

You're angry because they killed somebody who was on a killing spree? A lot of cops are corrupt and plain stupid, especially the idiots that shot at innocent people without any real inclination Dorner was there... but come on, this man murdered multiple people and clearly wasn't turning himself in, all while shooting at police officers.
 
Winter Woman

Winter Woman

Well-Known Member
jtprin said:
You're angry because they killed somebody who was on a killing spree?
Click to expand...
They had him and could have waited him out. Like Waco they decided to kill instead. There is a thing called The Law and a trial by a jury of your peers


Edit: I do believe he was guilty of murder. That was for the courts to decide not the po-po. Who are now murders in my eyes.
 
J

jtprin

Well-Known Member
Winter Woman said:
They had him and could have waited him out. Like Waco they decided to kill instead. There is a thing called The Law and a trial by a jury of your peers


Edit: I do believe he was guilty of murder. That was for the courts to decide not the po-po. Who are now murders in my eyes.
Click to expand...
He wasn't willing to turn himself in so a fair trial wouldn't have been possible. He was going to shoot to kill until he escaped, which is why he never came out of the cabin. Put it this way, if one of your dearest family members or friends worked as an officer and was shot and killed by a criminal and this happened, I guarantee you wouldn't be thinking about his "fair trial".
 
J

jtprin

Well-Known Member
Winter Woman said:
They had him and could have waited him out. Like Waco they decided to kill instead. There is a thing called The Law and a trial by a jury of your peers


Edit: I do believe he was guilty of murder. That was for the courts to decide not the po-po. Who are now murders in my eyes.
Click to expand...
So Dorner can kill the police but the police can't kill Dorner? Fair what?
 
Fungus Gnat

Fungus Gnat

Well-Known Member
jtprin said:
So Dorner can kill the police but the police can't kill Dorner? Fair what?
Click to expand...
I don't really care they can put their own mad dogs down. They created him.

The point is they spent millions on this guy if the people he killed were average people like members on this forum they wouldn't really care outside of the overtime pay they get.
 
match box

match box

Well-Known Member
The man was not going to leave that cabin. They could have waited him out. I didn't think he was going to live if the cops didn't shoot him I think he would have shot himself. They did not have to burn him out or up.
 
J

jtprin

Well-Known Member
Fungus Gnat said:
I don't really care they can put their own mad dogs down. They created him.

The point is they spent millions on this guy if the people he killed were average people like members on this forum they wouldn't really care outside of the overtime pay they get.
Click to expand...
Yeah, because cops never go after people who murder someone other than a cop.....
 
J

jtprin

Well-Known Member
match box said:
The man was not going to leave that cabin. They could have waited him out. I didn't think he was going to live if the cops didn't shoot him I think he would have shot himself. They did not have to burn him out or up.
Click to expand...
So you suggest sending more officers into the cabin, putting them at an unneccesary risk for being killed, all so that Dorner (who is the one doing the killing) can have a fair trial? Are you fucking insane?
 
dirtsurfr

dirtsurfr

Well-Known Member
[video]http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/video?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId= 8340235[/video]
 
Winter Woman

Winter Woman

Well-Known Member
jtprin said:
He wasn't willing to turn himself in so a fair trial wouldn't have been possible. He was going to shoot to kill until he escaped, which is why he never came out of the cabin. Put it this way, if one of your dearest family members or friends worked as an officer and was shot and killed by a criminal and this happened, I guarantee you wouldn't be thinking about his "fair trial".
Click to expand...
Anyone who has a family member murdered would want that murderer dead. But, anyone else would have to contend with a capture and a trial of that murderer. The men in blue feel they are different and that they are above the law, because they are the law. Now they made themselves the judge and the jury. The law is the law for everyone
 
J

jtprin

Well-Known Member
Winter Woman said:
Anyone who has a family member murdered would want that murderer dead. But, anyone else would have to contend with a capture and a trial of that murderer. The men in blue feel they are different and that they are above the law, because they are the law. Now they made themselves the judge and the jury. The law is the law for everyone
Click to expand...
So Dorner can shoot and kill police but police can't fight back? They have to wait for him to come out or gently go in there and capture him? If they went in there, he would've shot, and then the police would've shot back and he'd be dead anyways. Your point is moot and all you're doing is showing a clear hatred for the police. He would've never made it to trial because he was going to keep shooting, therefore cops would've shot back and ultimately killed him (which they did, except by fire).
 
Winter Woman

Winter Woman

Well-Known Member
jtprin said:
So Dorner can shoot and kill police but police can't fight back? They have to wait for him to come out or gently go in there and capture him? If they went in there, he would've shot, and then the police would've shot back and he'd be dead anyways. Your point is moot and all you're doing is showing a clear hatred for the police. He would've never made it to trial because he was going to keep shooting, therefore cops would've shot back and ultimately killed him (which they did, except by fire).
Click to expand...
I actually don't hate cops. They do a job I would not want to do. But, it is not their job to murder people, it is their job to apprehend people. The police didn't have to burn him like Waco. They didn't even have to go in, just wait him out, tear gas, flash grenades, etc. Or like I said wait him out they did have him surrounded, did they not? He wasn't going anywhere.

My point is moot because they murdered him. I am surprised that you agree with murder.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top