9.00 minimum wage is not enough...

[nontheist]

goddamn that was easy.

when did i say that i want higher premiums for people just for being poor?

Hello retarded bucky. Apparently you reading compensation has failed you? Where did I say you said poor people? I only insinuated because it's a fact more low income people smoke so the burden would fall more on them.

 

[nontheist]

until someone cites the PPACA instead of articles written by a contributor to theantiobamablog.com using the verb "could" instead of "will", that is pure speculation.

it is as speculative as your claim that you work 112 hours a week, every week, day in and day out.

Well it's obvious you don't so why do you care how hard I work? Because I find time to post a few lines on a forum here and there? So does everyone that post on forums not work their ass off? What's the premise for your ridiculous conjectures?

 

[UncleBuck]

Hello retarded bucky. Apparently you reading compensation has failed you?

this may go into my sig.

Where did I say you said poor people?

see post #339.

I only insinuated because it's a fact more low income people smoke so the burden would fall more on them.

first part (bold) false, second part true.

but winterwoman said that there was no exception for lower income people in her original claim, and she still has not cited the PPACA. i am still leaving that option open for her.

in the meantime, i laugh every time she posts an article from some moron who writes for theantiobamablog.com and only uses the word "could", and not "will". big difference there.

you could work 112 hours a week every week, but i doubt that claim will hold any water.

 

[UncleBuck]

why do you care how hard I work?

because it's funny to bust people lying online to try to impress others or make some point.

it's even more fun when you squirm every time i mention it because it is such an obvious lie.

you could just be honest about your hours and it would take all the fun out of it for me. for example, i work anywhere between 4 hours a week up to 166 hours per week, depending on the time of year.

Because I find time to post a few lines on a forum here and there?

dude, you spent all summer when you joined trying to troll me and then told me in the winter when you came back that it was your not so busy time of year.

so clearly, that does not comport.

you are clearly a sock puppet, i called it on your first post. rolli has confirmed as much, so you might as well just tell us who you are.

 

[nontheist]

this may go into my sig.



see post #339.



first part (bold) false, second part true.

but winterwoman said that there was no exception for lower income people in her original claim, and she still has not cited the PPACA. i am still leaving that option open for her.

in the meantime, i laugh every time she posts an article from some moron who writes for theantiobamablog.com and only uses the word "could", and not "will". big difference there.

you could work 112 hours a week every week, but i doubt that claim will hold any water.

You quoted an insinuation and and now you're telling me it said something it doesn't. Genius! I never said you said poor people but "it is what it is" no matter how you dance around it or sugarcoat it.

So do most business owners you know that have employees work a 9-5 uninterrupted through their day? Or would it be more accurate that they're the first to arrive and turn the lights off every day? Since you have the answer entrepreneurs have been searching from the beginning please enlighten us. How can you build a successful business working as little as possible? This is groundbreaking stuff lets here some ideas.

 

[UncleBuck]

This is groundbreaking stuff lets here some ideas.

*hear

you told me, and i quote, "you mean poor people". that's a pretty direct insinuation. dictionary.com tells me that an insinuation is suggested or hinted in a sly, subtle, or artful manner. "you mean poor people" does not meet my "sly, subtle, or artful hint or suggestion" criteria.

i sometimes work 166 hours a week, i sometimes do 4 a week. are you honestly trying to convince me that your daddy has you installing "greese" traps for 112 hours a week?

 

[nontheist]

*hear

you told me, and i quote, "you mean poor people". that's a pretty direct insinuation. dictionary.com tells me that an insinuation is suggested or hinted in a sly, subtle, or artful manner. "you mean poor people" does not meet my "sly, subtle, or artful hint or suggestion" criteria.

i sometimes work 166 hours a week, i sometimes do 4 a week. are you honestly trying to convince me that your daddy has you installing "greese" traps for 112 hours a week?

And yet it's still and insinuation regardless of how subtle it is we trying to split hairs? I haven't worked a four hour "day" in years even when the weather restricts I can't go home I have other responsibilities it just gives me a little more times to troll your dumbass.

 

[UncleBuck]

And yet it's still and insinuation regardless of how subtle it is we trying to split hairs? I haven't worked a four hour "day" in years even when the weather restricts I can't go home I have other responsibilities it just gives me a little more times to troll your dumbass.

so, what are your work hours like? 112 every week, like you said?

 

[nontheist]

so, what are your work hours like? 112 every week, like you said?

That's not what I said that's one of those retarded bucky conjectures we're so used to.

 

[UncleBuck]

That's not what I said that's one of those retarded bucky conjectures we're so used to.

i already found one quote tonight, i might as well find the other.

you said that it takes 16 hours a day, every day to run a business, and that you ( ) run a business.*

now that is an insinuation, smarty.

so tell me, does your dad work 112 hours a week to install those "greese" traps?







*LOL

 

[nontheist]

i already found one quote tonight, i might as well find the other.

you said that it takes 16 hours a day, every day to run a business, and that you ( ) run a business.*

now that is an insinuation, smarty.

so tell me, does your dad work 112 hours a week to install those "greese" traps?







*LOL

Context bucky. What I said is true and you not posting the full quote is a tell-tale of a bucky misdirection I didn't lie like claiming to be black or having a business that makes 500k a year not working as you so obviously did.

Actually what that point was is how disappointing it is for Obama to pull off his 100th trip to the gold course and saying he is in "touch" with hard working Americans. It pretty obvious Unclebeck has no understand of running a successful business. You must be the first one to arrive and that last to leave everyday, you must stay in constant contact, and always available. You must make sure you clients are happy and your workers happy, you have to fill in when an employee is down and still do your job. I would lose my ass off if I was fucking around on a gold course all the time. It consumes about 16 hours a day, not stop and there isn't anything such thing as weekends. Thats what it takes to be successful, anything else is half-assed and you wont make it, because you always have competition. For every 12 hours of physical work I put in, I am rewarded with 4 hours of paper work. You have to take pride in what you do and how good you do it because it makes punching a time clock at a 9 to 5er feel like a vacation. He also made some stupid ass comment that his uncle or something fucks off and makes 500k a year, what a joke.

 

[UncleBuck]

Context bucky. What I said is true and you not posting the full quote is a tell-tale of a bucky misdirection I didn't lie

so you work 16 hours a day, "not stop", no such thing as a weekend?

LOL!

are you really doubling down on that one?

like claiming to be black or having a business that makes 500k a year not working as you so obviously did.

when did i claim to have a business? i grow weed, you dumb shit. and it doesn't make $500k a year. more like $25-$28k.

my pa in law does have several businesses, and pulls about $300-$400k a year, but he doesn't spend 16 hours a day "not stop" doing it. he vacations more than i do and has far less stress as well. it's called delegation.

sounds a bit like what stormfront red so lovingly terms "misdirection".

 

[Winter Woman]

Bucky supports higher premiums for smokers he has admitted so. It's that self hating racist hypocrite in him. It's the poor that makes the majority of bad health decisions it's no secret and here we are on a cannabis forum rooting for legalization while trying to demonize smokers. It all makes sense somewhere in lalaland.

Bucky said that he would apologize if there is a penalty/tax for smoker's or over weight people. The penalty is $4,500 for smokers beyond the cost of insurance. So even with credits health insurance will be over $8,000 or 24% OF THEIR INCOME. Now I know poor people can afford that.

 

[Winter Woman]

i'm all for higher premiums for higher cost patients.

and i am still waiting for winter woman to reference the PPACA instead of some obama deranged internet gaylord.

Sorry Bucky this one came from the liberal Associated Press. If you want it you go out and find it yourself. You wanted it you read it.

 

[Doer]

She'll have to be either smart or very flexible to make the money off her back. cn

If she calls herself Bendi and works at the Bunny Ranch she can make a lot of money. But, she would have boss. Smart and flexible....I'll try Bendi.

 

[Doer]

no, that's not what you said, you lying sack of cowardly shit.

you said the only reason we are not a complete welfare state is because he was denied a later term (the second or third).

why you gotta lie, sistah?

No, even when you re-posted it as more harassment, I saw what I said. I said he had to be stopped. That is all I said. He was not. But, it was stopped for good this over 2 term business for Presidents, strictly because of FDRs grand fuckups we don't do that any more.

He had to be stopped. But, he was not. The effort to stop this 3rd and 4th term business began in his 3rd term and now it it is the Law. He had to be stopped, but the law had to be changed.

That was the point and only sophists try to make a minor, not well stated point a grand forum issue to brought up for any and all subject. If you are just going to lie about what is said, that one this, but this is smear. You Lie.

It's a big lie and you know that. Base and petty. Shoot the messenger, child's play. But, you don't think, you just take a page from the smear book, and wipe your post with it. Bucky is just a fuck up, so don't listen. One time his sentence was not very clear, oh my oh my. So, really not very interesting.

But, it is the usual tactic these days. (as seen on TV) Label,, lie and smear. And your ability to reason through seems to go in and out so you stoop to dog shit. It's your MO. You try to silence discussion with old made up lies. Playbook Nazi.

 

[UncleBuck]

Sorry Bucky this one came from the liberal Associated Press. If you want it you go out and find it yourself. You wanted it you read it.

1) it was written by a contributor to theantiobamablog.com

2) you should note the use of "could" and not "will"

3) there is no citation to the PPACA at all

one article from a biased author written in the conditional is weak sauce, even for you. i'll be happy to let you make another attempt and at least give a shot at referencing the PPACA, but you will never be able to.

i mean, you're citing stuff from the same crowd that was predicting the romney landslide. have you forgotten all about that fantasy world that we caught you guys living in? do you think we have forgotten about how you guys surround yourself with nonsense that is not based in reality in any way whatsoever?

 

[UncleBuck]

No, even when you re-posted it as more harassment, I saw what I said. I said he had to be stopped. That is all I said. He was not. But, it was stopped for good this over 2 term business for Presidents, strictly because of FDRs grand fuckups we don't do that any more.

He had to be stopped. But, he was not. The effort to stop this 3rd and 4th term business began in his 3rd term and now it it is the Law. He had to be stopped, but the law had to be changed.

That was the point and only sophists try to make a minor, not well stated point a grand forum issue to brought up for any and all subject. If you are just going to lie about what is said, that one this, but this is smear. You Lie.

It's a big lie and you know that. Base and petty. Shoot the messenger, child's play. But, you don't think, you just take a page from the smear book, and wipe your post with it. Bucky is just a fuck up, so don't listen. One time his sentence was not very clear, oh my oh my. So, really not very interesting.

But, it is the usual tactic these days. (as seen on TV) Label,, lie and smear. And your ability to reason through seems to go in and out so you stoop to dog shit. It's your MO. You try to silence discussion with old made up lies. Playbook Nazi.

bullshit. more lies from a lying liar.

your words were "BECAUSE he was stopped from term 3".*

even a semi-illiterate, bigoted southerner like nontheist can see that you honestly thought FDR was denied a third term.

why you gotta lie? is reality that upsetting to you?

 

[Doer]

Well, I did mis-type that somehow, maybe, but you are a known liar and and often prone to mis-quote. And flaming a Progressive, etc.

So, it doesn't matter to me if you edited my sentence. I've seen you do that before. You are a self appointed Fly Lord around here, I get that. But, all you posted was a sentence, you didn't reference the post. So, given your track record of slip-sliming away, it doesn't matter.

I mis-spoke and have corrected my intent of communication. If that's not enough, so what? So, say what you want, Heidi, I'll see you in the 22 A thread where we discuss the Fraud President that needed to be stopped.

 

[Winter Woman]

1) it was written by a contributor to theantiobamablog.com

2) you should note the use of "could" and not "will"

3) there is no citation to the PPACA at all

one article from a biased author written in the conditional is weak sauce, even for you. i'll be happy to let you make another attempt and at least give a shot at referencing the PPACA, but you will never be able to.

i mean, you're citing stuff from the same crowd that was predicting the romney landslide. have you forgotten all about that fantasy world that we caught you guys living in? do you think we have forgotten about how you guys surround yourself with nonsense that is not based in reality in any way whatsoever?

It came from the Associated Press.