And so just repeal the 2nd Amendment? That's one idea. Good luck with that.The answer is to melt all guns, and if you are caught with one, prison time.
Won't need a second amendment if there are no guns, It would be the right to kick someones ass.And so just repeal the 2nd Amendment? That's one idea. Good luck with that.
Then who will hold the police (they are civilians; never forget) to that standard? cnThe answer is to melt all guns, and if you are caught with one, prison time.
So, you want to repel the 2nd, first thing or after you collect and melt the guns.Won't need a second amendment if there are no guns, It would be the right to kick someones ass.
If there were no guns, you'd get stabbed in the face, like a bitch.Won't need a second amendment if there are no guns, It would be the right to kick someones ass.
You forget the martial law option?Then who will hold the police (they are civilians; never forget) to that standard? cn
Wouldn't invocation of martial law be the same as saying "OK the republic didn't work. Suck it up"? cnYou forget the martial law option?
But only in the then-Territory of Hawai'i and that ended in October 1944.Well, in a way, yes. But, it also, has various levels and boundaries of implementation. Martial law was established for the duration of WW2. Not the end of the republic. But, a suspension of certain civil liberties.
That's martial economy imo. cnOh, words and meaning. How do you describe gas rationing, forced collection of metal, curfews, and half blacked headlights? It was martial decrees by congress that suspended many ordinary rights. And it hit corporate America the hardest. No new autos were produced.
All watercraft over a certain size were seconded. That's martial law. It has limits and boundries for the situation.
I wonder if the definition is suffering some drift. I would widen it to include "with military assistance" to allow for the cases where the military don't actually supplant the civilian government. I note also that "in designated areas" is used by the dictionaries, suggesting that martial law can be regional as well as temporary. cnI thought martial law was defined as the temporary emergency deactivation of civilian Government in exchange for military rule.
Definition was too strong a word, "general personal understanding of meaning" wouldve been more accurateI wonder if the definition is suffering some drift. I would widen it to include "with military assistance" to allow for the cases where the military don't actually supplant the civilian government. I note also that "in designated areas" is used by the dictionaries, suggesting that martial law can be regional as well as temporary. cn