Protests in NYC!!!

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
i mean, is this redneck even familiar with brooklyn's demographics?

here is a map of NYC. pink-red dots are the white people, blue areas are the black people, hispanics are in orange and asians in green.

i leave it to the viewer to map it against NYC and see what brooklyn is like demographically.


 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
are you fucking shitting me?

jesus christ, that has to be one of the most racist things you have ever uttered.

i could walk into brooklyn and point out any number of white people that look like drug dealers or muggers or gang members.

thanks for removing all doubt though.
any number.... like say .3%?

just because the facts make you feel bad or seem racist that doesnt make those facts any less true.

modern urban black fashion endeavours to make the users look like a dope dealer or a gangbanger., this has the result of making EVERY modern urban fashion victim look like a dope dealer of a gangbanger.

thus if you are looking for suspected gangbangers, dope dealers etc... you will find that most of your profile are in fact minorities.

funny how the stats are listed as "Minorities" when in fact the results are most likely predominantly chicanos and blacks, not asians, south asians, native americans or australian aborigines.

if they run this same program in my neighborhood they would be frisking mostly chicanos and crackers, if they do it in oakland, they will turn up mostly blacks. if they do it in marin county they will get almost exclusively honkeys.
if they do it in chinatown... you get the idea.

but you know this, youre just manufacturing outrage.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
any number.... like say .3%?

just because the facts make you feel bad or seem racist that doesnt make those facts any less true.

modern urban black fashion endeavours to make the users look like a dope dealer or a gangbanger., this has the result of making EVERY modern urban fashion victim look like a dope dealer of a gangbanger.

thus if you are looking for suspected gangbangers, dope dealers etc... you will find that most of your profile are in fact minorities.

funny how the stats are listed as "Minorities" when in fact the results are most likely predominantly chicanos and blacks, not asians, south asians, native americans or australian aborigines.

if they run this same program in my neighborhood they would be frisking mostly chicanos and crackers, if they do it in oakland, they will turn up mostly blacks. if they do it in marin county they will get almost exclusively honkeys.
if they do it in chinatown... you get the idea.

but you know this, youre just manufacturing outrage.
not at all, my openly racist compadre.

i could find a good mix of white and black looking lowlives in the fucking bronx of all places, much less goddamn motherfucking brooklyn.

you've basically just opened up and told us all how you make judgments about people. it's all melanin based.

:clap:
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
i mean, is this redneck even familiar with brooklyn's demographics?

here is a map of NYC. pink-red dots are the white people, blue areas are the black people, hispanics are in orange and asians in green.

i leave it to the viewer to map it against NYC and see what brooklyn is like demographically.


so your position is the cops were not focussing on every person on the street, just those who looked like they might be up to no good? why thats racist! how dare they not search everyone!

its a simple fact of life well recognized by anyone who is not a fool, poor folks tend to engage in more crime. blacks tend to be poorer than any other group thus the criminal element in the "Black Community" would comprise a larger % than in the white, asian or chicano communities.

adding in the Hoodlum Chic factor you should not be surprised, and when you include the tendency of white and asian criminals to commit their crimes out of the view of the law....


Edit: and the solid blue area in the lower middle of your map is Brooklyn, with queens to the right... so your assumption fails miserably on it's face.

yeah i had to check a map, since yours conveniently didnt have any labels to demarcate the boroughs.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
modern urban black fashion endeavours to make the users look like a dope dealer or a gangbanger., this has the result of making EVERY modern urban fashion victim look like a dope dealer of a gangbanger.
this is exactly what makes you such a racist idiot.

if you can't spot a soft face behind some baggy clothes, you're a fucking idiot. or a racist. well, the two are basically synonymous. so take your choice.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
so your position is the cops were not focussing on every person on the street, just those who looked like they might be up to no good? why thats racist! how dare they not search everyone!

its a simple fact of life well recognized by anyone who is not a fool, poor folks tend to engage in more crime. blacks tend to be poorer than any other group thus the criminal element in the "Black Community" would comprise a larger % than in the white, asian or chicano communities.

adding in the Hoodlum Chic factor you should not be surprised, and when you include the tendency of white and asian criminals to commit their crimes out of the view of the law....
jesus goddamn christ you make a lot of retarded and racist assumptions.

my position is that you are a redneck bircher racist shitbag with a deluded and warped take on reality.

that is all.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
who is them?
Them is the rioting terrorists. They attack and loot innocents, but say "fuck da police?" WTF? Why not take on the police? Are they pussies or just want FREE shit? Maybe both? If they went after the police, I'd respect them. "Power to the people." I dig it, even though I'd still not agree with them.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
not at all, my openly racist compadre.

i could find a good mix of white and black looking lowlives in the fucking bronx of all places, much less goddamn motherfucking brooklyn.

you've basically just opened up and told us all how you make judgments about people. it's all melanin based.

:clap:
ZOMG recognizing differences in ethnic groups is "Making Judgements About People"!!!!

differnt groups do in fact do things differently and these groups can often be associated by ethnic lines.

if you round up all the methheads they would be mostly white and chicanos, if you round up the crackheads youll get mostly blacks, if you round up the powder cocaine users youll get almost entirely whites. if you round up people who buy jalapeno peppers and nopales youll get mostly chicanos, whats your point, besides the strong desire to call people racist if they dare recognize ethnic differences.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ZOMG recognizing differences in ethnic groups is "Making Judgements About People"!!!!

differnt groups do in fact do things differently and these groups can often be associated by ethnic lines.

if you round up all the methheads they would be mostly white and chicanos, if you round up the crackheads youll get mostly blacks, if you round up the powder cocaine users youll get almost entirely whites. if you round up people who buy jalapeno peppers and nopales youll get mostly chicanos, whats your point, besides the strong desire to call people racist if they dare recognize ethnic differences.
do you realize how hard i laugh when a redneck douchebag tries to educate me on "modern urban black fashion" and the like?

there's a huge difference between "recognizing ethnic differences" and assuming some black kid is a drug dealing gangbanger just because he has some baggy clothes on, moron.

the funniest part of all of this is that not only do you have no idea how stupid you sound, but you actually think you're giving us a valuable lesson or something.
 

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
It is not a simple question. It is an asinine question which belies your comprehension. It is private ownership of resources that is coercive. There is nothing more coercive than this in a market.

Shocking, didn't even attempt to answer the question, just called ownership coercive like a 5 year old. You said that individuals cannot own the means of production, how do you stop that from happening with Anarchism? You are like the children at OWS who draw anarchy signs on their tent and have no idea what it means.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Doc,

Totally. Most vegans are pale white sickly commie bastards. I feel so dirty. Every time I go to the special vegan store, I have to give the Obama cock sucking salute. Otherwise they piss on my organic fair trade arugula. :(
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
jesus goddamn christ you make a lot of retarded and racist assumptions.

my position is that you are a redneck bircher racist shitbag with a deluded and warped take on reality.

that is all.
Reality.

It Intrudes.


20_stipplemapnyc_1024x1024.jpg

you cannot pretend that the areas targeted due to their HIGH CRIME RATES are anything but predominantly black, and the predominance of blacks is NOT the cause of the policy, the HIGH CRIME RATES (violent crime in particular) is why the policy is in place.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Reality.

It Intrudes.


View attachment 2573955

you cannot pretend that the areas targeted due to their HIGH CRIME RATES are anything but predominantly black, and the predominance of blacks is NOT the cause of the policy, the HIGH CRIME RATES (violent crime in particular) is why the policy is in place.
lol.

yeah, that's brooklyn alright. and i'm marie of romania.

brooklyn is the area where the red and black meet just beneath those two empty circles called parks.

i'm not even talking about the stop and frisk law, i'm talking about your retarded assertion that baggy clothes = criminal.

you will never know how hilarious it is for a two bit racist bircher to lecture you about "modern black urban fashion", because the butt of the joke is you.
 

bundee1

Well-Known Member
Read it and weep or laugh if you want you cracker pendejos

NYPOST
[h=1]NYPD releases stop-frisk data[/h]
  • By NATASHA VELEZ
  • Last Updated: 1:29 PM, February 5, 2013
  • Posted: 12:51 AM, February 5, 2013
The NYPD last night released a report on its controversial stop-and-frisk procedure that breaks down by precinct — and by race — those who’ve been targeted.The figures, all from 2011, show the precinct with the most stops by sheer numbers was Brooklyn’s 75th, which includes East New York and Cypress Hills.
More than 31,000 people were stopped, 97 percent of them either black or Hispanic.
Brooklyn’s 73rd Precinct, covering Brownsville, was the next highest, with 25,167 stops. About 98 percent involved minorities.
The 115th Precinct — which includes East Elmhurst, Corona and Jackson Heights in Queens — ranked third, with 18,156 stops. Nearly 93 percent of those involved minorities, the figures show.

The 40th Precinct in The Bronx, which covers Mott Haven and Melrose, racked up the next highest number — 17,690 — with 98.5 percent involving minorities.
And at No. 5 was the 90th Precinct in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, where there were 17,566 stops, with 88.6 percent involving minorities.
The New York Civil Liberties Union had fought for release of the stats last year.
After getting them, the civil-rights group said they show a pattern of racial profiling — a charge that the NYPD denies.
"While it appears at first blush to be a slick, fact-filled response, nothing in the report can dispute the reality that stop and frisk NYPD-style is targeted overwhelmingly at people of color, so innocent of any criminal wrongdoing, that all but 12 percent walk away without so much as a ticket," NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman said in a statement.
The Police Department said it had no comment on why it was releasing the figures now.
As has been reported, the statistics show that overall, nearly 90 percent of those targeted by NYPD stop-and-frisks in the city in 2011 were either black or Hispanic.
Blacks and Hispanics together make up less than 53 percent of the city’s population.
A total of 685,724 people — 8.6 percent of the city’s population — were detained by cops for “reasonable suspicion.”
That was the highest number since the NYPD started recording stop-and-frisk figures in 2002, according to the NYCLU.
Of that number, 9 percent were white, and 4 percent Asian, the figures showed.
The No. 1 reason for stop-and-frisks that year was possible weapons possession, the report released yesterday said.
The statistics did not say how many of those stops resulted in arrests.
 

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member

  • A total of 685,724 people — 8.6 percent of the city’s population — were detained by cops for “reasonable suspicion.”






That's some scary shit right there.... That is a lot of police harassment.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Read it and weep or laugh if you want you cracker pendejos

NYPOST
NYPD releases stop-frisk data


  • By NATASHA VELEZ
  • Last Updated: 1:29 PM, February 5, 2013
  • Posted: 12:51 AM, February 5, 2013
wow.

considering that about half of brooklyn is white, that's pretty fucked up.

but according to miss kynes, it's all good since the blacks wear baggy clothes. he's studied "black urban criminal fashion" in an intensive course at bircher U. along with some fluoride and gay commie courses.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
lol.

yeah, that's brooklyn alright. and i'm marie of romania.

brooklyn is the area where the red and black meet just beneath those two empty circles called parks.

i'm not even talking about the stop and frisk law, i'm talking about your retarded assertion that baggy clothes = criminal.

you will never know how hilarious it is for a two bit racist bircher to lecture you about "modern black urban fashion", because the butt of the joke is you.

Pleased to meet you marie.

heres a map.




and heres another with the neighborhoods marked.

\

how does it feel to be so wrong?
 
Top