Fracking, what's the real deal ?

Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
No, not in public domain for non-commercial use.

The only problem with this, is Agenda. It is too easy to re-arrange the words and phases. And that is before it's printed into the public domain, jacked by the editorial boards....for Agenda.

So, not saying someone would, no, people have then, continued to shift it, even in the words themselves. But, if you just lift a puff piece PART, and still don't refernce the entire piece after being asked several times, that is AGENDA.

It is by far, the most easy way, to identify Agenda, this hiding of sources.
 
DutchKillsRambo

DutchKillsRambo

Well-Known Member
Last time I was backpacking in Central PA the entire 30 mile trail was littered with geophones and other fracking equipment. Everytime I had to shit, I made sure it was on or in their equipment. That's what I think of fracking.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
brimck325 said:
go ask the people living there, its destroying the environment. quite plain to see if you go there.
Click to expand...
The fire coming out of the faucet was a proven fake.

Plenty of areas of the country have wells with natural gas in them. It has nothing to do with fracking however.
 
RyanTheRhino

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
I don't see why they need chemical additives. The pressure from the water alone should be good enough.

They say it increases the viscosity of the slurry so the pumps are more efficient, you know what else is viscus MUD.

They say it helps dissolve limestone , why limestone is very weak

The basis is rather simple, pump porous material that oil/gas & and water can seep through into a hole.

The material/ slurry is heavier and takes up space pushing the lighter oil/gas to the surface. I really don't see the need for chemicals
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
RyanTheRhino said:
I don't see why they need chemical additives. The pressure from the water alone should be good enough.

They say it increases the viscosity of the slurry so the pumps are more efficient, you know what else is viscus MUD.

They say it helps dissolve limestone , why limestone is very weak

The basis is rather simple, pump porous material that oil/gas & and water can seep through into a hole.

The material/ slurry is heavier and takes up space pushing the lighter oil/gas to the surface. I really don't see the need for chemicals
Click to expand...
It adds flavor to the water table. Plus it will decrease your health insurance premiums by you prematurely dying of cancer
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
DutchKillsRambo said:
Last time I was backpacking in Central PA the entire 30 mile trail was littered with geophones and other fracking equipment. Everytime I had to shit, I made sure it was on or in their equipment. That's what I think of fracking.
Click to expand...
well, if they picked up your farting that is truly impressive.....but, you are just a simple punk vandal for bragging about it.

Did you smash them with rocks? No. You shit on the equipment. What an egghead statement of resistance. But, not really making much of a difference, is it.

Take a rock....never mind.
 
echelon1k1

echelon1k1

New Member
Doer said:
well, if they picked up your farting that is truly impressive.....but, you are just a simple punk vandal for bragging about it.

Did you smash them with rocks? No. You shit on the equipment. What an egghead statement of resistance. But, not really making much of a difference, is it.

Take a rock....never mind.
Click to expand...
would you let them frack right under your house dumbass? if not then stfu
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Dameon said:
Among the list of carcinogens used are formaldehyde (also a hazardous air pollutant), diesel, naphthalene and chemicals in the BTEX compound group (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene). ”The BTEX compounds appeared in 60 hydraulic fracturing products used in the 5-year period and were used in 11.4 million gallons of hydraulic fracturing fluids.” Most of those tainted fluids, 9.5 million gallons of the 11.4 million, were used in Texas. Less than 100,000 gallons were used in Pennsylvania and West Virginia.
Click to expand...
In what concentrations? cn
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top