Senator Rand Paul supports de-crim for Cannabis

ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
I've explained (thoroughly I thought) that had I served during that period that I would have signed title II because of the climate in the country and I would have likely thought I was doing the right thing. Having hind-sight I know that we can never attain true equality with slanted laws. I also respect the 1st.

It's weird that you would agree with this concerning the rich, but nobody else. We surely agree that people should play by the same rules as everyone else. You also want to give special rules to people you feel are inferior and need this and then yell racist at anyone who disagrees.

So in essence, one side of your face complains about an unlevel playing field the rich get to play on, yet your answer from the other side of your face is to purposefully enact and force an unlevel playing field slanted toward those you deem need it... because of their color... and if people disagree you call them racist.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you're too much of a pussy to just admit that you oppose title II, which puts you right on the side of the bigots and racists.
Click to expand...

I can't deny that my side has the out in the open racists and bigots yelling about this for the wrong reasons. I wish we could trade them for your non-lunatic Feinstein Pelosi type women. We'll even throw in Bachman and Palin to increase your lunatic women pool.

What your side has is the bigots and racists that are so arrogant you think your way is not just the best way, it's the only way you will tolerate, all while thinking you are superior to other races and geographical regions.

You have stated, several times, that blacks need special help that no other ethnic group needs. You try to cover up your racism by giving excuses for why you believe that way, but do the reasons why you think like this really change the fact?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
I've explained (thoroughly I thought) that had I served during that period that I would have signed title II because of the climate in the country and I would have likely thought I was doing the right thing. Having hind-sight I know that we can never attain true equality with slanted laws. I also respect the 1st.

It's weird that you would agree with this concerning the rich, but nobody else. We surely agree that people should play by the same rules as everyone else. You also want to give special rules to people you feel have been systematically disadvantaged and need this and then yell racist at anyone who disagrees.

So in essence, one side of your face complains about an unlevel playing field the rich get to play on, yet your answer from the other side of your face is to purposefully enact and force an unlevel playing field slanted toward those you deem need it... because of their history of persecution... and if people disagree you call them racist.
Click to expand...
ever so mildly edited for accuracy.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
I can't deny that my side has the out in the open racists and bigots yelling about this for the wrong reasons. I wish we could trade them for your non-lunatic Feinstein Pelosi type women. We'll even throw in Bachman and Palin to increase your lunatic women pool.

What your side has is the bigots and racists that are so arrogant you think your way is not just the best way, it's the only way you will tolerate, all while thinking you are superior to ignorant reagan drones and GOP ditto heads.

You have stated, several times, that blacks could use special help that some other groups could also use. I try to call you racist by being dishonest about why you believe that way.
Click to expand...
mildly edited for accuracy.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
ever so mildly edited for accuracy.
Click to expand...
I give you props for having a noble cause behind your racism, I really do. Doesn't change the fact you believe people need special help based on color.

I do like your form of racism better than the no darkies allowed form, so you got that going for ya.

I wish you would have the balls and just flat out call for reparations though, the discussion that followed would be entertaining.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Alright man, this one's getting boring. Let's go argue about the SCOTUS decision that hasn't been rendered yet or something.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Alright man, this one's getting boring. Let's go argue about the SCOTUS decision that hasn't been rendered yet or something.
Click to expand...
well, prop 8 is dead, that's for sure.

the only question now is if they extend it broadly. kennedy seems to be tipping yes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top