Tea baggers love feudalism.
- Thread starter abandonconflict
- Start date
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Tysonism
[video=youtube;CbIZU8cQWXc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CbIZU8cQWXc[/video]
[video=youtube;CbIZU8cQWXc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CbIZU8cQWXc[/video]
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Yet you still haven't actually read Adam Smith, so you have no idea if Chomsky is right or not, because you're an idiot who thinks Chomsky is arguing any conclusion about capitalism aside from what Adam Smith was saying.
You're also an openly racist troll who distorts every argument you explicate.
"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand." ~Bertrand Russel.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
I never read Chomsky. I get pissed reading his bullshit even super high or stoned.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Abandon,
I totally agree, most of the time government intervention uses their invisible hand to steal from you.
I totally agree, most of the time government intervention uses their invisible hand to steal from you.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
i havent read adam smith? man. my library card is a LIAR!
smith was required reading when i was in school, i also read plato's republic, voltaire, das kapital, and the communist manifesto, most of trotsky all of mussolini, and got about 1/4 through mein Kamph before i could take no more.
also, Confucius' Dialectics, the Mencius, Miyamoto's book of 5 rings, the art of war, the aryu vedas, the epic of gilgamesh, and so much more. i do not focus solely on western ideas, which seems to be a problem in "anarcho-____ist" circles. anything from before the 19th century, or from east of vienna is regarded as pointless rubbish, except Quotations From The Chairman, which is holy writ.
your sophomoric interpretations of Smith (entirely founded on chomsky's twisted vision) are completely off the mark, you might as well claim Alexis De Tocqueville also despised america and capitalism, or that John Locke was an anarchist.
Chomsky views the world through the prism of his ideology (as do we all) but Chomsky's world is tilted 15 degrees off true, like a Batman villain's lair. his interpretations are well accepted by the leftists in academia and psuedo-intellectuals, but real classicists, scholars and historians find very little of value in his overblown prose.
i suppose youll be repeating your claim that Bertrand Russel was not a marxist as well now.
despite your staunch refusal to read the Communist Manifesto, and your pathetic ignorance of Socialism, Communism and Collectivism is patently obvious to anyone who has studied Marxist theory, you endlessly prattle on. but ignorance is your only defense since you cant be a marxist if you dont know shit about marx.
as well to claim definitively that Jesus is Lord, only the "saved" can enter heaven, and every word of the bible is 100% literal truth, but never reading the damned book yourself, so you don't have to face the fact that it's bullshit.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
I have read Manifesto Kynes. I am aware how many left wing philosophers, authors and economists have written books that contain some of Marx's views. That is not enough to qualify one as Marxist. You preach Marx more than anybody, that makes you a Marxist according to your logic.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
You post pictures and quotes more often than your own thoughts. If that doesn't make you a Marxist...
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
A working society allows for reward of mutual altruism. A failing society is one where people are too afraid to be the first to cooperate. jmo
[video=youtube;BA4dZ6NVNbk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=BA4dZ6NVNbk[/video]
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
That strikes me as a touch facile. In a society that contains strangers, the reward for altruism can be more exploitation. That needs to be capped somehow. (I don't know how.) cn
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Why is there is there so few exploits in Linux compared to even Mac?
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
1 linux is more secure
2 no one uses linux
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Now replace Linux with "Libertarian government."
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
I find item 2 still holds. cn
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
That was my whole point. What happens if an idiot uses Linux?
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
dduuhh ... tell me? cn
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Then why doesn't government understand such a concept?
I need this file using Linux, now.
Government will talk about what is Linux. Fund head start programs to teach the new Windows 8. After still not retrieving the file off Linux, their final solution is to declare a new Department of Technology and Cyber Police.
It's too much to ask only those who know Linux can declare laws about Linux. Instead, Buck's friend with the gun does.
That kid actually held a gun too. Yet our Chief, let's just say I have my doubts he even held a loaded gun.