#NRAlogic

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
but-

there be no pistol grip. no forearm cover. no laser sighting. no taped together 100 pennies. no folding stock. no carry handle. no noise suppression. no gloss plastic.

that is NOT an assault weapon.
Did you not hear?

If it has detactable magazines it now count as an assault weapon.

Unlike the non-assault weapons they make...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
i soundly defeated his arguement earlier by stating that guns are our protection from our own govuerment as all governments break down by increasing oppression and restriction of rights and freedoms over time as proven in every historical example you can think of until our country was established.
nope, try again.

that might have been one of the reasons for the second, but that time is long gone, sistah.

the more realistic interpretation of "to protect the security of a free state" given the time and the rest of the text of the second is seen as protecting us in case king george wanted to come back.

what you're arguing is now known as the "absolutist" interpretation, which the supreme court has roundly rejected.

Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.

chew on that, sistah. and please, don't choke.
 

Murfy

Well-Known Member
the only reason i have puffy pants-

is there is are a cock and balls in there. this is the thing though. i really don't care that you're shallow and petty. or that you married a slightly autistic woman so you could dupe her into sex slavery. i just don't want you to be able to force it on my children. it precludes you from heaven you know? :)
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
the only reason i have puffy pants-

is there is are a cock and balls in there. this is the thing though. i really don't care that you're shallow and petty. or that you married a slightly autistic woman so you could dupe her into sex slavery. i just don't want you to be able to force it on my children. it precludes you from heaven you know? :)
i hope you realize that every time you default to your zombie kid fairy tale, you are just letting us know what a deluded fool you are.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Yes it does, if it were limited in some way it would have said so.
how many times do i have to remind you guys about this thing called reality?

from heller, the opinion of the 5 most conservative judges:

Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
it's not really the weapons, it's the unfettered access to them, especially by those who have no business with a slingshot, much less a military style rifle.
I get it, now. You'll deem who's the real Jew. Everyone else gets rounded up, "Impure! No gun for you! Off with her head!"
 
Top