#NRAlogic

N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
The whole idea of gun control is to limit the number of deaths.
Click to expand...
No it isn't!! The goal is to take away guns. If they gave a shit about deaths there are other things they could do that would save many times more lives than gun control. How many people die each year from taking PRESCRIPTION medications? 20,000? 30,000? 40,000 a year?

How many people are murdered each year by gun? ( Not including suicide or righteous defensive killing) 9000 or so?

Argue the numbers all you want. Gun control, is about disarming people, not saving lives. They could make other laws that would save many many times more lives than gun control EVER will.

None of these laws will do anything to prevent suicides ( 2/3rds of the statistics) or gang member killings ( 75% of the leftovers after taking out suicides).

at best this law might save 20 or 30 people a year. not worth giving up a right for such a small effect.
 
deprave

deprave

New Member
londonfog said:
The whole idea of gun control is to limit the number of deaths. I guarantee I can get more kills per minute with a hk416 then a knife or a hand gun limited to 10 rounds. Now ask yourself which one do you think will get more DEAD faster and quicker

oh and please don't bring a knife to a gun fight
Click to expand...
more kill per minute? Are you talking call of duty or real life? I guarantee I can get an hk416 if it was illegal, I guarantee you I could kill people without an hk416, If I were a murderer. I gurantee you I can get as many kills as with _____ If I didn't have _____. Jeffrey Dahmer killed 18 people? with steak knives?


No my friend...The whole idea of "Gun Control" is a play on your emotions to use and abuse you. "Gun Control" is not a noble thing, its a human rights violation. It is much akin to the "Save the Baby Seals Campaign" which was really just a ploy for oil companies to strike down their competition so they could continue to murder baby seals in solitude.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
No it isn't!! The goal is to take away guns. If they gave a shit about deaths there are other things they could do that would save many times more lives than gun control. How many people die each year from taking PRESCRIPTION medications? 20,000? 30,000? 40,000 a year?

How many people are murdered each year by gun? ( Not including suicide or righteous defensive killing) 9000 or so?

Argue the numbers all you want. Gun control, is about disarming people, not saving lives. They could make other laws that would save many many times more lives than gun control EVER will.

None of these laws will do anything to prevent suicides ( 2/3rds of the statistics) or gang member killings ( 75% of the leftovers after taking out suicides).

at best this law might save 20 or 30 people a year. not worth giving up a right for such a small effect.
Click to expand...
so the government is trying to disarm us. Then what will they do??? Is this the same logic as you thinking that America would be fine without a military.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
But its about the CHILDREN!!! Oh Sob, Oh Cry!! Oh woe are we when others are allowed to have magazines of more than 10 capacity! Oh cry!!
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
I know about Birmingham and it has nothing on Detroit or Chicago. To the red highlight how many lives would have to be saved in order for you to agree???
Click to expand...
I grew up downriver Detroit, graduated from Univ Of Alabama-Birmingham. Trust me when I tell you this. They are very similarly run cities, the demographics mirror, the socio-economic classes are in the same boats, the unemployment rates are almost identical, the populations of the two cities are much closer than Detroit and Chicago, what more do you need to compare the two?

Saved lives is an unquantifiable supposition. I read an opinion from an unbiased source that says 100 times as many lives have been saved by guns than lives lost by guns. Prove me wrong.

londonfog said:
no i posted it saying he spoke from a neutral side.."hint" remember the word unbiased
Click to expand...
If my opinion comes from a neutral side, does someone else get to quote me as fact? It's still an opinion.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
so the government is trying to disarm us. Then what will they do??? Is this the same logic as you thinking that America would be fine without a military.
Click to expand...
I never said America would be fine without a military, why do you constantly make false shit up? Why do you do that? Do you think it makes you look smart? IT'S FUCKING STUPID to claim facts when it is incomprehensibly easy to PROVE you WRONG!! Why are you so fucking dumb to keep claiming false shit all the time?

What Psycho Pathological error does your grape contain that causes you to act this way?
 
FootballFirst

FootballFirst

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
I never said America would be fine without a military, why do you constantly make false shit up? Why do you do that? Do you think it makes you look smart? IT'S FUCKING STUPID to claim facts when it is incomprehensibly easy to PROVE you WRONG!! Why are you so fucking dumb to keep claiming false shit all the time?

What Psycho Pathological error does your grape contain that causes you to act this way?
Click to expand...
the founding fathers feared a large standing military because it could be used by a potential tyrant to oppress the American people, not to mention the cost of such a monstrosity.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
deprave said:
more kill per minute? Are you talking call of duty or real life? I guarantee I can get an hk416 if it was illegal, I guarantee you I could kill people without an hk416, If I were a murderer. I gurantee you I can get as many kills as with _____ If I didn't have _____. Jeffrey Dahmer killed 18 people? with steak knives?
Click to expand...
wow you can't be this dense..How long did it take Jeffrey to kill those 18 people ???? You can NOT legally own the HK 416 lower part, which is the part registered as a machine gun... only upper is legit , so I call you on that guarantee to own the illegal part. Hope you speak German. Once again people please stop talking firearms if you know nothing about them
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
FootballFirst said:
it's clear. he thinks saving less than 200 lives per year is worth restricting what made and makes America so great, freedom.
Click to expand...
yes I think saving 200 lives a year is worth limiting mag size and types of weapons fools carry...For the record I would compromise with a 15 mag size limit..not ten
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
I never said America would be fine without a military, why do you constantly make false shit up? Why do you do that? Do you think it makes you look smart? IT'S FUCKING STUPID to claim facts when it is incomprehensibly easy to PROVE you WRONG!! Why are you so fucking dumb to keep claiming false shit all the time?

What Psycho Pathological error does your grape contain that causes you to act this way?
Click to expand...
NoDrama said:
I really don't think anything would happen if the Military was disbanded at all. Prove me wrong.
Click to expand...
LOL...are you senile or forgetful
 
FootballFirst

FootballFirst

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Please tell me what freedom is being taking...You still can bare arms
Click to expand...
my right to bear arms with large magazines.

man, they should warm up the bullpen. you should change the subject like canndo and buck when you aren't winning. or result to personal attacks, buck is especially good at using that tactic to get under people's skin.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top