See, I have no anger. You have projection. You wish I was. It's obvious.
Bring me something other that underlined shouting. I bother to bring links. You brought a thin skin, seems to me.
I have no opinions that cannot be changed. I have no opinions at all, that I evaluate as above meaningless. Just opinions and I will never feel one way or another about mere opnioins.
So,. child. This isn't some emotional right-fight about respecting culture. That's for Toke and Talk. You never see me there.
I come here seeking knowledge. I see ownership actual of maybe 90% of Canada by England and administered by England through her actual employeement of the Law and Order, British Law and Order. And She Influences by her Repressentation is in the Senate of Canada. Her Privy Council has governer Represntatipon for all the Commonweath.
She is your Queen. And she is a very tough old bird, God Save Her. She is sourrouded by hard asses, that run the House of Lords, and the Canada question is well in hand by England. It is changing. I will grant you. But it changes, not in ignorance, but the light of understanding...from discussion. Prove to me these are not hereditary lands that pass in whole, to Charles when he is King. Prove it. You can't. Canada doesn't have actual title to these lands. The Crown owns Canada in perpetuity of the Monarchy....as I have brought to the discussion and you have only shouted against.
Prove to me that those grand residences of the Crown Governors and other Representatives of Her, Blessing Be, are not maintained at tax payer expense, though no Reps arrive. I've been to the stuff in BC. That is what they say.
So, when you jumped into the 2nd A discussion, well fine. But, don't act like you know shit about it, please.
And if you think you have a point, I'm all eyes to your references, only.