Timewasmoney1
New Member
back at the '11 cannabis cup they mentioned that. Would be killer to grow some thai stick data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22cfd/22cfdaafd09a05976d48474d1c52a79074114887" alt="Very Happy :D :D"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22cfd/22cfdaafd09a05976d48474d1c52a79074114887" alt="Very Happy :D :D"
You can get thai from much better breeders. Be ready for a real pain in the ass to grow though.back at the '11 cannabis cup they mentioned that. Would be killer to grow some thai stick![]()
Through who? Why is it difficult? Alltitude i assume?You can get thai from much better breeders. Be ready for a real pain in the ass to grow though.
There are a lot of reasons GHS gets slagged.I personally hate when people bitch about GHS and Arjan making money off his business. If you don't like their genetics don't buy them, but there is no reason to bad mouth people you don't know. GHS has been around for along time and I feel very strongly that they would have gone out of business if they weren't decent breeders. I've done searchs to try to find out why people hate on them so much, and all I ever find is hearsay and conjecture about the company and about Arjan. I wish I could do what he does for a living, growing, and traveling around collecting genetics is literally my dream job, but I'm not gonna hate on him cus he gets to do it.
There are a lot of reasons GHS gets slagged.
At least of it has to do with the behavior of the owner.
For one thing Arjan Roskam refers to himself as the "King of cannabis", which, at best, "should" be a title given to you by OTHER people, not yourself. That's a little bit of clue into his attitude/mentality. His personal ethics have been widely questioned; reportedly he enjoys a poor reputation locally in Amsterdam for unethical business practices, and the locals see his coffeehouses mostly as tourist traps. As another he's posted what can only be described as an "unprofessional" rant on a competitor on the internet.
I don't need to know him personally to know that this sort of rant is full of BS and highly unprofessional. If he's doing that publically, what is he doing privately? If he really has the better genetics, why does he have to launch this sort of public personal attack?
Another big issue with GHS is that Roskam was caught red-handed bribing judges in the 2003 High Times Cannabis cup, and had two cup wins that year reversed. This was widely reported in the Dutch press at the time. Needless to say, this sort of thing casts a great deal of doubt on his various cup wins after and especially before that point in time. So when one of his big marketing "sticks" is his number of cup wins, you have to sort of roll your eyes.
GHS has a lot of puffery out there on his ceeds and genetics (websites with questionable numbers, coatings of questionable value, etc), but when it comes down to it, by most accounts I've seen from growers I respect, the actual genetics are largely mediocre.
Which isn't to say that none of his lines are good, and to the contrary, he probaby does have a few good ones, just that chances for disappointment are high.
With so many excellent lines out there by respected breeders, I don't see much reason to take chances with those with questionable ethics or genetic quality.
I bought my last bed from the "Mattress King", should I have checked to make sure he was endowed this title by his peers to be assured that he wasn't just another asshole trying to sell beds?There are a lot of reasons GHS gets slagged.
For one thing Arjan Roskam refers to himself as the "King of cannabis", which, at best, "should" be a title given to you by OTHER people, not yourself. That's a little bit of clue into his attitude/mentality. His personal ethics have been widely questioned; reportedly he enjoys a poor reputation locally in Amsterdam for unethical business practices, and the locals see his coffeehouses mostly as tourist traps. As another he's posted what can only be described as an "unprofessional" rant on a competitor on the internet.
I don't know both sides of the story but from reading that it sounds like he was attacked first and is trying to set the record straight. *shrugs*There are a lot of reasons GHS gets slagged.
At least of it has to do with the behavior of the owner.
For one thing Arjan Roskam refers to himself as the "King of cannabis", which, at best, "should" be a title given to you by OTHER people, not yourself. That's a little bit of clue into his attitude/mentality. His personal ethics have been widely questioned; reportedly he enjoys a poor reputation locally in Amsterdam for unethical business practices, and the locals see his coffeehouses mostly as tourist traps. As another he's posted what can only be described as an "unprofessional" rant on a competitor on the internet.
I don't need to know him personally to know that this sort of rant is full of BS and highly unprofessional. If he's doing that publically, what is he doing privately? If he really has the better genetics, why does he have to launch this sort of public personal attack?
Citation needed!Another big issue with GHS is that Roskam was caught red-handed bribing judges in the 2003 High Times Cannabis cup, and had two cup wins that year reversed. This was widely reported in the Dutch press at the time. Needless to say, this sort of thing casts a great deal of doubt on his various cup wins after and especially before that point in time. So when one of his big marketing "sticks" is his number of cup wins, you have to sort of roll your eyes.
Questionable coatings? They use this stuff on like, Scott's commercial grass seed that you can buy at Home Depot. That prob means it has some value.GHS has a lot of puffery out there on his ceeds and genetics (websites with questionable numbers, coatings of questionable value, etc), but when it comes down to it, by most accounts I've seen from growers I respect, the actual genetics are largely mediocre.
This last part I agree with, there are supposedly quite a few good breeders so why not stick with them first.Which isn't to say that none of his lines are good, and to the contrary, he probaby does have a few good ones, just that chances for disappointment are high.
With so many excellent lines out there by respected breeders, I don't see much reason to take chances with those with questionable ethics or genetic quality.
I still don't think the company would still be around if they were so terrible. That being said, I've never ran any GHS genetics
Well, I haven't actually watched any of them so I wouldn't know.You could have just linked to any of Arjans youtube videos and let him explain it himself.
Even if that were true, he can do that without over the top personal attacks or eye-rolling tall tales. Its not THAT he responded , its HOW. I don't need to know the other "side of the story" (although I actually *DO* know it) to know that his behavior is competely unprofessional and reflects badly on him as a person and businessman.I don't know both sides of the story but from reading that it sounds like he was attacked first and is trying to set the record straight. *shrugs*
How Arjan was caught red handed rigging the High Times Cannabis cup in 1999? (sorry, it wasn't '93 as I think I mentioned above). No problem; here's a contemporaneous account from a Dutch 'zine. For obvious reasons, both Roskam and High Times have tried to pretend that this never happened:Citation needed!
http://www.coffeehouseculture.com/E-zine/Issue One/E-zine Pages/Issue One Pages/Page 03/P03PT02.html
COFFEEHOUSE CULTURE -- Issue 1
PAGE THREE; ARTICLE TWO; NEWS: CANNABIS CUP '99
VOTE RIGGING SCANDAL;
AMSTERDAM SHRUGS ITS
SHOULDERS
As most of the judges were heading home for Thanksgiving after a more than usually successful Cannabis Cup news broke on Dutch TV that a vote rigging scam had been discovered.
ONE OF AMSTERDAM's best known and most successful coffeeshop chains has been stripped of one of its cups as a result of an exercise in vote rigging that has left many within the coffeeshop community confused or merely questioning the credibility of the Cannabis Cup. Greenhouse, owned by Arjan Roskam, won and then lost the Hashish Cup. Also stripped of their medals were second and third prize winners: Rokerij and Het Kruydenhuys. As a result of the swift exit of the three top prize winners, the hash entered by the coffeeshop placed fourth in the original count, Dutch Flowers, was elevated to first position and duly received the cup. Er . . . .congratulations, guys.
THE news of the vote rigging, which was featured on Dutch TV and received considerable domestic press coverage, was a disappointing end to an otherwise successful Cannabis Cup. For the first time this year, coffeeshop owners were responsible for judging the seed company and hash competitions. The general view among cup regulars and entrants was that the judging procedures and restraints on ostentatious expenditure on 'promotional' activities were far
Coatings are useful if you're going to broadcast seeds through an automated planter because they can ensure dispensable size and seed uniformity. They can have value in reducing fungal growth with some slow-growing ceeds. With cannabis drug strains? Not unless you're planting a whole field of them!Questionable coatings? They use this stuff on like, Scott's commercial grass seed that you can buy at Home Depot. That prob means it has some value.
OK, here is Shantibaba (aka Scott Blakely, Mr Nice Seeds) side of the story. This is taken from Matt Rize's website; he's a known hash-maker and expert, and actually one of the mods on this board for concentrates. Now, bluntly, this was 20+ years ago, I wasn't there, and I really don't know what happened. Each of the participants in this story have their own "take" on what happened, and the versions don't all agree. But regardless, it seems plain that the "tone" coming from Shantibaba here is totally different than from Roskam:I don't know both sides of the story but from reading that it sounds like he was attacked first and is trying to set the record straight. *shrugs*
Define "so terrible". There is definitely worse out there.I try not to bad mouth anyone, though some of the stories may be true, I still don't think the company would still be around if they were so terrible.
I think there was a formal High Times video documentary of its 1999 cup produced, though I haven't seen it, and can't answer.Isnt there an embarrassing video of one of the cannabis cups to back this up? I thought I saw one last year.