Balzac89
Well-Known Member
Can you really argue that all the co2 we put into the air does not have any effect on climate
Impossible! The deficit is falling as well as unemployment Obama wrecking economy
- Thread starter ChesusRice
- Start date
Can you really argue that all the co2 we put into the air does not have any effect on climate
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Cause he poked holes in your post? Poor Buck-under-another-name, reduced to replying to himself. Not ever happened before, no, not ever.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Shut up and drink your kool-aid.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
The record high stock market, rising food prices,etc.
You're joking. Right?
Inflation doesn't cause the market to tank, it does the opposite. Do you know what "inflation" means?
The employment numbers count losing your $25/hour full time job and getting a $7.50/hour part time job with no benefits as being fully employed.
Why you always got to call those who disagree with you racist?
Red1966
Well-Known Member
We only produce a small proportion, less than 1%, of what is produced naturally. Not my argument anyway. My argument is that global warming hasn't occured, in fact, there has been global cooling recently. The change from "man caused global warming" to "man caused climate change" is evidence that the argument never held weight to begin with.
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
It's not really necessary to do so, since C02 increases follow temperature increases, just like they ALWAYS have. It wasn't until Fat Al's An Inconvenient Fallacy that the two were switched to make the evidence support the claim. Unfortunately, there is decades of evidence, not to mention every book on the subject that clearly tracks C02 increases lagging behind temperature increases by 5-10 years. But, that doesn't fit the agenda, so OOPSIE, we'll just change it.
This is where Chesus will C&P something from somewhere he believes has credibility that will dispute that fact. He will then post something from the complicit liberal media that supports that bunk. Then, Bob's your uncle, case closed. The "media" and this here blogger say what I want to hear, so you should ignore that pesky evidence that shows the entire movement is horseshit.
REMEMBER THE SPOTTED OWL!!!
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
*occurred
seems like a nobel prize winning toilet scrubber would get that one right.
cooling trend, you say?
behold the hottest 10 years on record.
[TABLE="class: wikitable sortable jquery-tablesorter"]
[TR]
[TH="class: headerSort"]Year[/TH]
[TH="class: headerSort"]Global[SUP][65][/SUP][/TH]
[TH="class: headerSort"]Land[SUP][66][/SUP][/TH]
[TH="class: headerSort"]Ocean[SUP][67][/SUP][/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2010[/TD]
[TD]0.6590[/TD]
[TD]1.0748[/TD]
[TD]0.5027[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2005[/TD]
[TD]0.6523[/TD]
[TD]1.0505[/TD]
[TD]0.5007[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]1998[/TD]
[TD]0.6325[/TD]
[TD]0.9351[/TD]
[TD]0.5160[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2003[/TD]
[TD]0.6219[/TD]
[TD]0.8859[/TD]
[TD]0.5207[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2002[/TD]
[TD]0.6130[/TD]
[TD]0.9351[/TD]
[TD]0.4902[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2006[/TD]
[TD]0.5978[/TD]
[TD]0.9091[/TD]
[TD]0.4792[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2009[/TD]
[TD]0.5957[/TD]
[TD]0.8621[/TD]
[TD]0.4953[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2007[/TD]
[TD]0.5914[/TD]
[TD]1.0886[/TD]
[TD]0.3900[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2004[/TD]
[TD]0.5779[/TD]
[TD]0.8132[/TD]
[TD]0.4885[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2012[/TD]
[TD]0.5728[/TD]
[TD]0.8968[/TD]
[TD]0.4509[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
what an unremitting failure you are.
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Yes, behold. And kindly disregard the thousands of years that man couldn't/didn't maintain temperature records. And while you're at it, please disregard the BILLIONS of years before that. I mean, come on, it's not like we can scientifically determine there were much, much hotter periods on earth before man started burning fossil fuels. Oh, wait...
Back to the "unremitting failure" line again? You give Hannity a run for his money in the blathering repetition category.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
yeah, i'm sure that agriculture and sea level cities will be just fine with pumping greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere at record rates.
and i'm even more sure that the guy who can't interpret simple polling data accurately within 15 points has some special insight that peer reviewed publishing climatologists are just stupidly missing.
i mean, you're parroting rush limbaugh, what could possibly go wrong?
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
yeah, i'm sure that agriculture and sea level cities will be just fine with pumping greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere at record rates.
and i'm even more sure that the guy who can't interpret simple polling data accurately within 15 points has some special insight that peer reviewed publishing climatologists are just stupidly missing.
i mean, you're parroting rush limbaugh, what could possibly go wrong?
Well, since those very climatologists predicted those same sea level cities would already be underwater in the next couple of years and that doesn't seem to be the case, I guess we'll be going with my theory, since it's the ONLY one that still holds water. Time's a bitch isn't it? If only you Progs could have passed your horseshit legislation BEFORE all your predictions fell on their face. Oh well, on to the next manufactured crisis to force your true agenda on to a population that would otherwise recoil from such stupidity.
REMEMBER THE SPOTTED OWL!!!™
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
gonna need some citation on that, you have a habit of speaking straight out of your ass with all the comfort of a man sleeping on a 10 point romney lead.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
hear that, climatologists? yuou guys can all stop now.
the guy who read a 10 point romney lead into the polls has this one all figured out.
trust him, he's super smart and hangs curtains. he was only off by 15 points on that romney lead thing, too. so his track record is pretty air tight.
LOL!
what a fucking clown you are.
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Keep trying. Countless attempts at marginalizing and it's still YOU that looks like the idiot every time you repost the same shit. You do realize it's the same people reading your flaccid insults? They see you have nothing but a pathetic crutch to fall back on and it really does make you a laughing stock. But hey, Cheebs "likes" your posts, so rock on.
Cool down, forget the girls who laughed when you took off your pants, you're married now and she obviously does a good job hiding her disappointment. It's time to put on your "big boy" pants and stay on topic.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
still waiting on your citation, clown!
as soon as i get it, i will send out the e-mail telling all the world's scientists that they can stop researching climate science and just listen to you and rush limbaugh instead.
i mean, after all, your track record is basically impeccable.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Wow, so the hottest its ever gotten is 1.0748 degrees? "what an unremitting failure you are."
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
those little blue numbers are links to citations of the instrumental temperature record.
seems to me that if we were in a cooling trend, we would not have just endured the hottest two decades on record with nine of the last 10 years in the top 10 hottest.
that just doesn't seem to be a recent cooling trend, as our resident expert red claims is happening.
i should not have to point out that it has been above 2 degrees to a supposed nobel prize winner's "colleague".
Nutes and Nugs
Well-Known Member
Well it's still friggin cold here for mid May.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
It's dark here right now. Maybe we have global darkening as well
Antidisestablishmentarian
Well-Known Member
Didn't you know?
global warming causes every kind of weather event known to man.
Best to remember: If its cold, global warming caused it. If its raining hard, global warming.
