zimmerman news

Status
Not open for further replies.

Red1966

Well-Known Member
1- you have a sad point of view if you think this is an argument. 2- nothing needs to be proven now. It is in front of a jury. The judge has decided what to allow. Justice is next. 3 - Justice is not solely based on facts with Juries. And facts are only presented into evidence, well or badly 4 - Less benefit of the doubt for a minor child in a back dog run on a rainy night, in rightful place and un-armed 5 - People can tell when there are lies. It is in the micro-expressions if they can explain it or not. 6 - It all changes in a fight when someone draws on an un-armed minor child, 158 pounds with a heart monitor 7- This entire thing is too weak to say, "fear for ones life" unless there was a struggle for the gun, a free gun is the buzz words. No free gun here. 8 - This entire thing is too weak to say, "fear for one's life" if Zim had the presence to to draw, clear the elbow, clear Martin's hands, and bring the weapon inside the fight were he say was afraid of it going. But that is why he drew. It doesn't make sense. 9 - Zim tried to concoct "another weapon" story. "..thought he had a peice of concrete in his hand." No evidence of that. Pulled his hands out to cover Zim smashing his own nose to go with his head scratch. No evidence at all, that these injuries are not just faked. Especially the nose. He certainly exaggerated the entire thing and has been shown to be lying about it. If you think you can't smash, you own nose to cover a rage gone bad, think again. I have done that to myself accidentally. Turn him over spread hands out, smash own nose on the ground. Get up and look like you had to kill him. Begin the story line. Too many lies. So, if I stipulate to all of what you say, Muy, there is still nothing that gives the guy the right to kill. A gun in my right hand with you on top trying to quiet me, goes into your left ribs hard. And if that don't make you jump back, Jack....(think about that barrel punch to the left ribs) I say, get off me motherfucker. And then I clop him very stiffly in the temple. That is how I'm trained to not kill. If someone is unarmed and me with a gun, I won't kill him without cause. Very bad. But, woudl I be chasing a kid with some bullshit story about looking for the exact address. No. That was the death of a child. Very bad. Now where was Zims hands in all this fighting? He didn't land any blows. He didn't grab Trevons neck like any of us will do automatically. No, he squirmed. He says off to the grass, witness says squirmed ONTO the concrete. A guy chases an unarmed boy in the dark with a gun and initiates a confrontation. And instead of using the gun properly in this situation he killed him,for no real reason, but his story, from about 1 foot away, straight to the heart. But, I'm not on the jury and not arguing the case.
I am amazed at how much misinformation you have. You should let the prosecuter know about all those witnesses you quote, because he sure hasn't put them on the stand. You also sound like the idiot who said Zimmerman should have just taken the beating because he hadn't received any fatal injuries (yet). I guess one shouldn't defend them selves until they're at least half dead.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I am amazed at how much misinformation you have. You should let the prosecuter know about all those witnesses you quote, because he sure hasn't put them on the stand. You also sound like the idiot who said Zimmerman should have just taken the beating because he hadn't received any fatal injuries (yet). I guess one shouldn't defend them selves until they're at least half dead.
*prosecutor

nobel worthy.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
basically it goes like this: zimmerman says he is getting pounded by "25-35" horrific blows, his head slammed repeatedly into the concrete for about a minute, with martin suffocating him (even though he is still somehow able to cry for help), in a fight that lasts about 30-45 seconds and moves from the T to about 30-50 feet away from the T (even though martin sucker punched him from two different angles depending on the account and immediately pinned and straddled him). if you can believe all that, you should also have no problem believing that as zimm is squirming to the grass, his gun suddenly becomes exposed and martin, who is busy administering the world's most horrendous beating (which somehow leaves no blood on his hands or cuffs, and nothing but a tiny scrape on his left ring finger), somehow sees the gun (either with the eyes in the back of his head or while he is stopping to take a sip of his refreshing beverage) and reaches for it (despite no DNA evidence for such), and it is at this point that zimmerman, in a feat of superhuman strength, gains full wrist control of martin with one hand, reaches for the gun with the other, makes sure to move his arm out of the way (the arm that is exercising full wrist control over martin), and fires. all the while, we get the perfect 1970's blaxploitation dialogue to accompany: "you got a problem homie?" "you gonna die tonight homie!" "you got me, you got me". hollywood never produced a more unlikely scenario. no fucking asshole or fucking punk could write a better script to be sure.
Nothing but bias here folks.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Nothing but bias here folks.
you dumbass, everything i just recited was something zimmerman had said at some point.

the eyes in the back of the head theory and similar type explanations were me trying to add plausibility to zimm's account of things, so that it would actually make sense.

but good job on illustrating the extent to which you are just blowing wind out of your rear end.

I thought you brought race into it.
nope, it was desert dud. go read back, child.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
you dumbass, everything i just recited was something zimmerman had said at some point. the eyes in the back of the head theory and similar type explanations were me trying to add plausibility to zimm's account of things, so that it would actually make sense. but good job on illustrating the extent to which you are just blowing wind out of your rear end. nope, it was desert dud. go read back, child.
Pretending your quoting Zimmerman is just a lye. Mocking is not "adding plausibility". Pretending ewe maid up you're opinion on anything other than race is not fooling anybody. You couldn't be truthful if you're life depended on it.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Pretending your quoting Zimmerman is just a lye. Mocking is not "adding plausibility". Pretending ewe maid up you're opinion on anything other than race is not fooling anybody. You couldn't be truthful if you're life depended on it.
then show me which facts i got wrong then or what doesn't correspond to zimmerman's story, you dumb sack of shit.

YOU CAN'T!

instead, you just drop in and make these snide, retarded remarks that everyone just has to shake their heads at.

you're like a fucking child.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
and again, my apologies for pointing out that you can't spell simple fucking words like "prosecutor" or "hazard", red.

either improve your education beyond the level of a remedial 7th grader or own your stupidity, shit stain.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
and again, my apologies for pointing out that you can't spell simple fucking words like "prosecutor" or "hazard", red. either improve your education beyond the level of a remedial 7th grader or own your stupidity, shit stain.
Oh get off it. Pretending that using a spell checker to check others spelling somehow makes you smarter than anyone else is just a child demanding he's equal to an adult. Pretending a misspelled word or 2 invalidates my statements is the tactic of someone who knows he can't win a debate on its merits. If that were true, what does having know ability to use the shift key prove?
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Buck seems to have an unusual bias against Hispanics. But he's not a bigot. No, of course knot.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Oh get off it. Pretending that using a spell checker to check others spelling somehow makes you smarter than anyone else is just a child demanding he's equal to an adult. Pretending a misspelled word or 2 invalidates my statements is the tactic of someone who knows he can't win a debate on its merits. If that were true, what does having know ability to use the shift key prove?
that you think i have to use a spell checker to get "hazard" or "prosecutor" correct is hilarious.

and the spelling is only the cherry on top of the 'red is dumber than a bag of smashed cock' cake. i asked you to show me which statements i made were false, you couldn't. instead you chose to portray yourself as a victim for being unable to spell simple words.

i ask you again: which statements did i make that were false, red?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Sorry, that's not the definition of bigot. Bigot.
looks like red decided to come back, but not to back up his original claim of calling bullshit on the actual facts and statements i strung together.

looks like red came back to try to bring race back into things baselessly, and for no other reason than his own ass hurt.

so sad to be red.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
looks like red decided to come back, but not to back up his original claim of calling bullshit on the actual facts and statements i strung together. looks like red came back to try to bring race back into things baselessly, and for no other reason than his own ass hurt. so sad to be red.
Translation: I'll keep claiming my bullshit is fact, pretend I haven't been on a racially motivated campaign to convict a man based solely on the race of parties involved, and call anyone who calls me on it a racist, and then claim I have won the debate. What I can't do in the bedroom, I make up for by being a self-aggrandizing fool on the internet.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Translation: I'll keep claiming my bullshit is fact
i've asked you repeatedly to point out what i have said that is not true.

you have been unable to point out one single thing i have said as untrue.

therefore, we can safely assume that you are just expressing your own asshurt rather than lodging a legitimate complaint of non-factuality.

my invitation stands for you to tell me what i posted that is not true.


pretend I haven't been on a racially motivated campaign to convict a man based solely on the race of parties involved,
first of all, i can't convict anyone.

secondly, i have not brought race into this, as so many others have.

i invite you to point out where i have brought race into this, as you have just done repeatedly and baselessly, dumbass.


Tand call anyone who calls me on it a racist
you're a racist for the specific disdain you have towards blacks voting on sundays, not for your unremitting failures in this thread.


Tand then claim I have won the debate.
i have never claimed to have "won" the debate, and am not even interested in winning.

i am happy to see this went to trial for full examination of the facts in front of a jury, i happen to think the defense will win but i reserve my prediction until deliberation occurs.


TWhat I can't do in the bedroom, I make up for by being a self-aggrandizing fool on the internet.
sounds like projection to me, especially coming from the same guy who told us all that "you have no idea what my sexual capabilities are!".

i invite you one more time to point out any falsehoods in my original post from earlier today.

this post was completed without the use of a spellchecker.
 

SlaveNoMore

Active Member
The number of times the word RACE has been used in this thread up until this post:

113

The pages with the highest usages of the word RACE:

Page 18..with 9 uses
Page 12...had 7 uses

There were several pages with 5 and 6 uses and several pages with no uses.






 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Your falsehoods are too numerous to list hear. I suspect the only times you have ever posted anything that was not false was when you claimed you can't have sex with your wife because "she bleeds from her vagina" and the multiple times you have regaled us with the humor of your lack of control over shitting and pissing your pants. Claiming a statement I never made is proof of my racism is typical of your total lack of honor and honesty. So, trying to get out in front of the total failure of your claim of murder against Zimmerman by pretending you predicted his acquittal?...lol........
 

SlaveNoMore

Active Member
It took me 1:06.48 minutes to say the word RACE 113 times. I tried to say RACE 2 times per second. Considering there are at least 2 hours worth of conversation in this thread 113 isn't too bad.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The number of times the word RACE has been used in this thread up until this post:

113

The pages with the highest usages of the word RACE:

Page 18..with 9 uses
Page 12...had 7 uses

There were several pages with 5 and 6 uses and several pages with no uses.






how many times before desert dud started posting about race in this thread?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top