Do you support gay marriage

[AlabamaRedneck]

No. Gays cannot reproduce by natural means, so they have no right being "married".

 

[kpmarine]

No. Gays cannot reproduce by natural means, so they have no right being "married".

Then nobody gets married legally. Civil unions for gay and straight couples!

 

[Rob Roy]

No. Gays cannot reproduce by natural means, so they have no right being "married".

Who determines the rights of others and how is it determined?

 

[AlabamaRedneck]

Who determines the rights of others and how is it determined?

Nature my friend, nature.

Nature provides no way for gays (strict gays, not bisexuals) to pass on their genes...a great way to ensure their traits are not perpetuated in the gene pool...

As Demi Moore said in "GI Jane", Fine by me, Master Chief.

 

[kpmarine]

Nature my friend, nature.

Nature provides no way for gays (strict gays, not bisexuals) to pass on their genes...a great way to ensure their traits are not perpetuated in the gene pool...

As Demi Moore said in "GI Jane", Fine by me, Master Chief.

We said "fuck nature" the moment we started circumventing it with medicine. It's not natural to survive aggressive cancers, HIV infection, a ruptured appendix, etc. We have this thing known as "artificial insemination" that allows for gays to reproduce these days. Your arguments are invalid.

 

[AlabamaRedneck]

We said "fuck nature" the moment we started circumventing it with medicine. It's not natural to survive aggressive cancers, HIV infection, a ruptured appendix, etc. We have this thing known as "artificial insemination" that allows for gays to reproduce these days. Your arguments are invalid.

Nature doesn't want gays to reproduce.

Yes, human brains have evolved to learn how to circumvent nature, to a certain extent. Artificial inseminations, vaccines, supposed "cures", etc. But every once in a while, nature rears her ugly head and reminds us that we are simply observers, and not architects.

The more we "circumvent" nature, the more we fool ourselves into thinking we are in control...we control nothing more than the air conditioning in our cars...nothing more...

Again, nature doesn't want gays to reproduce...and the more we fight against that, the more rude awakening we set ourselves up for...

Champion rump-ranging shit-eating gays if you like, but you are wrong...and nature agrees with me...

 

[kpmarine]

Nature doesn't want gays to reproduce.

Yes, human brains have evolved to learn how to circumvent nature, to a certain extent. Artificial inseminations, vaccines, supposed "cures", etc. But every once in a while, nature rears her ugly head and reminds us that we are simply observers, and not architects.

The more we "circumvent" nature, the more we fool ourselves into thinking we are in control...we control nothing more than the air conditioning in our cars...nothing more...

Again, nature doesn't want gays to reproduce...and the more we fight against that, the more rude awakening we set ourselves up for...

Champion rump-ranging shit-eating gays if you like, but you are wrong...and nature agrees with me...

So you actually assign intent to nature? Nature isn't sentient; it doesn't "want" anything. By your standards; we should just pack it all up and move back to the caves.

 

[UncleBuck]

So you actually assign intent to nature?

ya know who else did the exact same thing? our old friend shotgun420.

sock puppet easily detected.

 

[UncleBuck]

No. Gays cannot reproduce by natural means, so they have no right being "married".

neither can many straight couples, should they also be denied marriage licenses?

should people have to pass fertility tests before they are granted a marriage license?

nice sock poppet, shitgun420. not fooling anyone.

 

[tokeprep]

Nature doesn't want gays to reproduce.

Yes, human brains have evolved to learn how to circumvent nature, to a certain extent. Artificial inseminations, vaccines, supposed "cures", etc. But every once in a while, nature rears her ugly head and reminds us that we are simply observers, and not architects.

So what about anyone else who can't naturally reproduce? No marriage, right?

The more we "circumvent" nature, the more we fool ourselves into thinking we are in control...we control nothing more than the air conditioning in our cars...nothing more...

Again, nature doesn't want gays to reproduce...and the more we fight against that, the more rude awakening we set ourselves up for...

Champion rump-ranging shit-eating gays if you like, but you are wrong...and nature agrees with me...

Alas, now the gays can reproduce relatively easily, just like some previously infertile straight couples can. Get used to it.

 

[Highlowazupkush]

We said "fuck nature" the moment we started circumventing it with medicine. It's not natural to survive aggressive cancers, HIV infection, a ruptured appendix, etc. We have this thing known as "artificial insemination" that allows for gays to reproduce these days. Your arguments are invalid.

Medicine is perfectly natural, it just depends on what the medicine does and things like that. It's also perfectly natural for people to want to help each other by designing advanced technology which allows them to have their own children with their DNA after they've have failed to have children the NATURAL way. So you could say that avf (or w/e its called) is not natural when compared to the natural course, but in regards to the meaning behind this technology, it is indeed perfectly natural.

So in regards to the above sentence, I have a question, Is it ok to be gay? and how do you determine the answer?
Its obvious that gay couples will teach their kids to be tolerant of homosexuals, but the bad thing is that they may teach them that being gay is ok, which I do not think is necessarily correct.

Why is it ok for something that was designed to do one thing, to go off-course and not do what it was designed to do?.. Oh wait, I have the answer lol.. Its free will, isn't it?
Shit i suppose that being gay is ok then considering that people have free will to do whatever they like, right? Though im not sure that's the final answer.

So now its: "free will" vs "designed to reproduce".
Is it ok, and why is it ok for a being that has free will to chose to do something that goes against the intention of its design? I suppose a logical counter question would be "why is it not ok".

Yep that's it! Why is it not ok to be gay? I think that people will find out if it is indeed not ok to be gay through science, when they find out the process behind people becoming homosexuals.
Then again, it probably is just simply ok to be gay. However wrong it is in my opinion.

right, so then, DO I support gay marriage? No! but I definitely do not oppose it

 

[SHOTGUN420]

ya know who else did the exact same thing? our old friend shotgun420.

sock puppet easily detected.

Always thinking of me eh? buck. I told you before I don't swing that way m8. I can also assure you and I'm sure the mods can too me and him are 2 different users. You just stand stand when users have an opposing view to your own so you pull shit out of your ass.

 

[AlabamaRedneck]

neither can many straight couples, should they also be denied marriage licenses?

should people have to pass fertility tests before they are granted a marriage license?

nice sock poppet, shitgun420. not fooling anyone.

Don't confuse implementation failures (i.e. straight people who can't technically reproduce) with DESIGN failures (i.e. fucking pervert gays) who can't reproduce AT ALL in accordance with their sickness.

Just my opinion there, unemployed former treadmill seller Buck. Welfare supporting you and your family now? I'll send ya a few bucks (no pun intended) if you need a handout.

 

[kpmarine]

Don't confuse implementation failures (i.e. straight people who can't technically reproduce) with DESIGN failures (i.e. fucking pervert gays) who can't reproduce AT ALL in accordance with their sickness.

Now it's a sickness? Please direct me to the medical journal where it got diagnosed as an illness.

 

[UncleBuck]

Don't confuse implementation failures (i.e. straight people who can't technically reproduce) with DESIGN failures (i.e. fucking pervert gays) who can't reproduce AT ALL in accordance with their sickness.

Just my opinion there, unemployed former treadmill seller Buck. Welfare supporting you and your family now? I'll send ya a few bucks (no pun intended) if you need a handout.

wow, what an angry little sock puppet bigot.

your argument was that gays can't reproduce by natural means, therefore they should not be able to get married.

but many straight people can not reproduce by natural means, either. but that's not really a problem for you.

i don't even need to go through your failure in logic there, you've made it quite clear that you're just a bigoted douchebag and your opinions are based on such.

shitgun420 has an awesome group you can join, you'll fit right in over there.

 

[UncleBuck]

Always thinking of me eh? buck. I told you before I don't swing that way m8. I can also assure you and I'm sure the mods can too me and him are 2 different users. You just stand stand when users have an opposing view to your own so you pull shit out of your ass.

that was edited?

 

[Rak on Tur']

A persons marriage is none of the governments business, they should have zero say on the issue.

 

[UncleBuck]

A persons marriage is none of the governments business, they should have zero say on the issue.

remind me who hands out the marriage licenses again?

since the state is not gonna stop handing them out anytime soon, and since that makes it a civil and legal issue, that also makes it a civil right and subject to equal protection under the law.

i had lots of fun watching rawn pawl fanboys use the argument you just did to dance their way around the fact that they are libertarians who don't believe in liberty or the 14th amendment.

 

[Rak on Tur']

remind me who hands out the marriage licenses again?

since the state is not gonna stop handing them out anytime soon, and since that makes it a civil and legal issue, that also makes it a civil right and subject to equal protection under the law.

i had lots of fun watching rawn pawl fanboys use the argument you just did to dance their way around the fact that they are libertarians who don't believe in liberty or the 14th amendment.

Marraige licensees were put in place to stop interracial marriage, but I'm sure you knew that. It was wrong then, and wrong now. I will stick with my common law marriage, I will never ask some government shill for permission for my personal life choices.

 

[UncleBuck]

Maybe bitch boy buck maybe.

no, not maybe. it was definitely edited, even says so at the bottom of the post.

and despite that editing, your grammar was so atrocious that it would make even illiterate and retarded illegal immigrants cry at your stupidity.

It happens when adults drink and try to reply to children.

i drink every night and my grammar doesn't suffer.

quit trying to use alcohol as an excuse for your illiteracy and lack of education.

Where you been ?

did some gardening today. pulled weeds, planted a second crop of sweet walla walla onions and potatoes, staked tomato plants, tended to my greenhouses.

speaking of pulling weeds and throwing them in the compost pile, how is that twig you're abusing? about ready for harvest? any new pics of that pathetic little thing?

Hows Mrs. hands? I see the holocaust survivors fund is keeping you alive and fed. What camp was your wife in again?

we survive quite well off of my small income and her million+ dollars worth of assets and investments, but good job on reminding us how much you hate jews.

good seeing you again!