AlabamaRedneck
New Member
No. Gays cannot reproduce by natural means, so they have no right being "married".
Then nobody gets married legally. Civil unions for gay and straight couples!No. Gays cannot reproduce by natural means, so they have no right being "married".
Who determines the rights of others and how is it determined?No. Gays cannot reproduce by natural means, so they have no right being "married".
Nature my friend, nature.Who determines the rights of others and how is it determined?
We said "fuck nature" the moment we started circumventing it with medicine. It's not natural to survive aggressive cancers, HIV infection, a ruptured appendix, etc. We have this thing known as "artificial insemination" that allows for gays to reproduce these days. Your arguments are invalid.Nature my friend, nature.
Nature provides no way for gays (strict gays, not bisexuals) to pass on their genes...a great way to ensure their traits are not perpetuated in the gene pool...
As Demi Moore said in "GI Jane", Fine by me, Master Chief.
Nature doesn't want gays to reproduce.We said "fuck nature" the moment we started circumventing it with medicine. It's not natural to survive aggressive cancers, HIV infection, a ruptured appendix, etc. We have this thing known as "artificial insemination" that allows for gays to reproduce these days. Your arguments are invalid.
So you actually assign intent to nature? Nature isn't sentient; it doesn't "want" anything. By your standards; we should just pack it all up and move back to the caves.Nature doesn't want gays to reproduce.
Yes, human brains have evolved to learn how to circumvent nature, to a certain extent. Artificial inseminations, vaccines, supposed "cures", etc. But every once in a while, nature rears her ugly head and reminds us that we are simply observers, and not architects.
The more we "circumvent" nature, the more we fool ourselves into thinking we are in control...we control nothing more than the air conditioning in our cars...nothing more...
Again, nature doesn't want gays to reproduce...and the more we fight against that, the more rude awakening we set ourselves up for...
Champion rump-ranging shit-eating gays if you like, but you are wrong...and nature agrees with me...
ya know who else did the exact same thing? our old friend shotgun420.So you actually assign intent to nature?
neither can many straight couples, should they also be denied marriage licenses?No. Gays cannot reproduce by natural means, so they have no right being "married".
So what about anyone else who can't naturally reproduce? No marriage, right?Nature doesn't want gays to reproduce.
Yes, human brains have evolved to learn how to circumvent nature, to a certain extent. Artificial inseminations, vaccines, supposed "cures", etc. But every once in a while, nature rears her ugly head and reminds us that we are simply observers, and not architects.
Alas, now the gays can reproduce relatively easily, just like some previously infertile straight couples can. Get used to it.The more we "circumvent" nature, the more we fool ourselves into thinking we are in control...we control nothing more than the air conditioning in our cars...nothing more...
Again, nature doesn't want gays to reproduce...and the more we fight against that, the more rude awakening we set ourselves up for...
Champion rump-ranging shit-eating gays if you like, but you are wrong...and nature agrees with me...
We said "fuck nature" the moment we started circumventing it with medicine. It's not natural to survive aggressive cancers, HIV infection, a ruptured appendix, etc. We have this thing known as "artificial insemination" that allows for gays to reproduce these days. Your arguments are invalid.
Always thinking of me eh? buck. I told you before I don't swing that way m8. I can also assure you and I'm sure the mods can too me and him are 2 different users. You just stand stand when users have an opposing view to your own so you pull shit out of your ass.ya know who else did the exact same thing? our old friend shotgun420.
sock puppet easily detected.
Don't confuse implementation failures (i.e. straight people who can't technically reproduce) with DESIGN failures (i.e. fucking pervert gays) who can't reproduce AT ALL in accordance with their sickness.neither can many straight couples, should they also be denied marriage licenses?
should people have to pass fertility tests before they are granted a marriage license?
nice sock poppet, shitgun420. not fooling anyone.
Now it's a sickness? Please direct me to the medical journal where it got diagnosed as an illness.Don't confuse implementation failures (i.e. straight people who can't technically reproduce) with DESIGN failures (i.e. fucking pervert gays) who can't reproduce AT ALL in accordance with their sickness.
wow, what an angry little sock puppet bigot.Don't confuse implementation failures (i.e. straight people who can't technically reproduce) with DESIGN failures (i.e. fucking pervert gays) who can't reproduce AT ALL in accordance with their sickness.
Just my opinion there, unemployed former treadmill seller Buck. Welfare supporting you and your family now? I'll send ya a few bucks (no pun intended) if you need a handout.
that was edited?Always thinking of me eh? buck. I told you before I don't swing that way m8. I can also assure you and I'm sure the mods can too me and him are 2 different users. You just stand stand when users have an opposing view to your own so you pull shit out of your ass.
remind me who hands out the marriage licenses again?A persons marriage is none of the governments business, they should have zero say on the issue.
Marraige licensees were put in place to stop interracial marriage, but I'm sure you knew that. It was wrong then, and wrong now. I will stick with my common law marriage, I will never ask some government shill for permission for my personal life choices.remind me who hands out the marriage licenses again?
since the state is not gonna stop handing them out anytime soon, and since that makes it a civil and legal issue, that also makes it a civil right and subject to equal protection under the law.
i had lots of fun watching rawn pawl fanboys use the argument you just did to dance their way around the fact that they are libertarians who don't believe in liberty or the 14th amendment.
no, not maybe. it was definitely edited, even says so at the bottom of the post.Maybe bitch boy buck maybe.
i drink every night and my grammar doesn't suffer.It happens when adults drink and try to reply to children.
did some gardening today. pulled weeds, planted a second crop of sweet walla walla onions and potatoes, staked tomato plants, tended to my greenhouses.Where you been ?
we survive quite well off of my small income and her million+ dollars worth of assets and investments, but good job on reminding us how much you hate jews.Hows Mrs. hands? I see the holocaust survivors fund is keeping you alive and fed. What camp was your wife in again?