Why do Hispanic people have the nerve

Jihad&Sharia

Jihad&Sharia

New Member
To name their kids Jesus, but Muslimes will not name their kids Allah. Its a disgrace in a way. especially if Jesus kids dont like up to be just like Jesus. Its almost a disgrace in a way

Discuss
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Jihad&Sharia said:
To name their kids Jesus, but Muslimes will not name their kids Allah. Its a disgrace in a way. especially if Jesus kids dont like up to be just like Jesus. Its almost a disgrace in a way

Discuss
Click to expand...
I don't even know who you are complaining about, hispanic parents who name their kid 'Jesus' - that is 'Hay-soos' in latin countries, not 'Gee-zus', or Muslim parents because they won't name their kids 'Allah'

It's a disgrace because those kids named 'Jesus' won't grow up to be "just like Jesus"? How is a parent to know how his kid will act before they name it?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
I don't even know who you are complaining about, hispanic parents who name their kid 'Jesus' - that is 'Hay-soos' in latin countries, not 'Gee-zus', or Muslim parents because they won't name their kids 'Allah'

It's a disgrace because those kids named 'Jesus' won't grow up to be "just like Jesus"? How is a parent to know how his kid will act before they name it?
Click to expand...
this is a troll thread by a sock puppet who joined today.

enjoy it for what it is.
 
PeyoteReligion

PeyoteReligion

Well-Known Member
Jihad&Sharia said:
The Trinity has 3 divine persons, God, Jesus, Holy spirit as 1 god in 3 persons. Mohammad is not a god, but a prophet
Click to expand...
To the Muslims, Jesus is considered a prophet. They do not consider him the son of god, nor do the jews. So it's apples and oranges to liken them.

I think I'll name my child God Allah (last name). I think that's pretty strong. I'll raise him as an atheist (if he/she so chooses).
 
mindphuk

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
thepenofareadywriter said:
jesus is a Hispanic name, it isn't Hebrew...:shock:
Click to expand...
Please stop. You keep ignoring people that correct you. Jesus is a name that comes from transliteration of Yeshua to Greek and Latin.
Continuing to claim that it was 'made-up' demonstrates more than ignorance because you have been told why English speakers call him Jesus. You just sound like an idiot when you repeat this crap.

BTW, yellow fonts on bright red background is the most obnoxious, unreadable shite that you could have chosen for your profile.
 
thepenofareadywriter

thepenofareadywriter

Well-Known Member
mindphuk said:
Please stop. You keep ignoring people that correct you. Jesus is a name that comes from transliteration of Yeshua to Greek and Latin.
Continuing to claim that it was 'made-up' demonstrates more than ignorance because you have been told why English speakers call him Jesus. You just sound like an idiot when you repeat this crap.

BTW, yellow fonts on bright red background is the most obnoxious, unreadable shite that you could have chosen for your profile.
Click to expand...
..I understand that your mindphuked..but are you really that stupid ! you have no idea of what you are talking about, according to what you wrote, it appears that you don't even know what transliteration is..and the truth of the matter is you act like a phuking little kid:finger::finger::finger:x 3
 
mindphuk

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
thepenofareadywriter said:
..I understand that your mindphuked..but are you really that stupid ! you have no idea of what you are talking about, according to what you wrote, it appears that you don't even know what transliteration is..and the truth of the matter is you act like a phuking little kid:finger::finger::finger:x 3
Click to expand...
Fuck you, you little prick! I certainly DO know what I'm talking about, but it appears you want to double down on your ignorance. YES, taking a name from one language to another preserving letter order is the definition of transliteration. Yes, Jesus is combined transliteration + Anglicisation. Yeshua or Yehoshua (both forms of Joshua) would be proper transliteration from Hebrew, but since the bible made some pit-stops in Greek and Latin before ever getting translated to English, we are stuck with transliteration from the Greek/Latin transliterations of Yeshua.

Who's acting like a kid now? You spout off nonsense and then when challenged, you don't even attempt to defend it using citations or logic, but resort to personal attacks. That's the response we expect from children, not an adult.

Go ahead, prove me wrong. It would do more for your reputation than silly cartoon middle-fingers. I've corrected you before under both this as well as your previous incarnation here but you're obviously too blinded by your ideology to give consideration that you might be wrong. Please, let's see your intellectual prowess here and explain to me why Ya'akov, Moshe, Yitzhak converted to Jacob, Moses and Isaac don't bother you but Yeshua to Jesus somehow means that it was "made up."

"Made up" implies fictitious, while I may agree with you that the mythological Jesus is a complete work of fiction, it doesn't eliminate the fact that the name Jesus is merely a place-holder for the character Yehoshua/Yeshua that the New Testament was written about and that virtually all names that originate in Hebrew or Aramaic have been altered in English text bibles but that has absolutely nothing to do with their actual existence. Do you call Israel Yisrael? Jerusalem, Yerushalayim? Yea, that's what Hebrew speaking Christians use and and they use the name Yehoshua/Yeshua, not Jesus. Yet somehow in your food-starved brain of yours you came to the conclusion 'that there was no one named Jesus' and can't seem to understand this name-change has absolutely zero relevance to the historicity of the man people know as Jesus

For awhile, it seemed you were just a harmless twat that has some odd beliefs, now it appears to everyone that you are likely as crazy as George but only half as intelligent.
 
maryjaneslave

maryjaneslave

Active Member
jesus isnt really real , u cant prove it, its a disgrace that u act on stories from 2 thousand years ago, plus i just want to say the shroud of turban was proven fake, it was made by the church to get people to fill thier seats and give money
 
Beefbisquit

Beefbisquit

Well-Known Member
thepenofareadywriter said:
..I understand that your mindphuked..but are you really that stupid ! you have no idea of what you are talking about, according to what you wrote, it appears that you don't even know what transliteration is..and the truth of the matter is you act like a phuking little kid:finger::finger::finger:x 3
Click to expand...
mindphuk said:
Fuck you, you little prick! I certainly DO know what I'm talking about, but it appears you want to double down on your ignorance. YES, taking a name from one language to another preserving letter order is the definition of transliteration. Yes, Jesus is combined transliteration + Anglicisation. Yeshua or Yehoshua (both forms of Joshua) would be proper transliteration from Hebrew, but since the bible made some pit-stops in Greek and Latin before ever getting translated to English, we are stuck with transliteration from the Greek/Latin transliterations of Yeshua.

Who's acting like a kid now? You spout off nonsense and then when challenged, you don't even attempt to defend it using citations or logic, but resort to personal attacks. That's the response we expect from children, not an adult.

Go ahead, prove me wrong. It would do more for your reputation than silly cartoon middle-fingers. I've corrected you before under both this as well as your previous incarnation here but you're obviously too blinded by your ideology to give consideration that you might be wrong. Please, let's see your intellectual prowess here and explain to me why Ya'akov, Moshe, Yitzhak converted to Jacob, Moses and Isaac don't bother you but Yeshua to Jesus somehow means that it was "made up."

"Made up" implies fictitious, while I may agree with you that the mythological Jesus is a complete work of fiction, it doesn't eliminate the fact that the name Jesus is merely a place-holder for the character Yehoshua/Yeshua that the New Testament was written about and that virtually all names that originate in Hebrew or Aramaic have been altered in English text bibles but that has absolutely nothing to do with their actual existence. Do you call Israel Yisrael? Jerusalem, Yerushalayim? Yea, that's what Hebrew speaking Christians use and and they use the name Yehoshua/Yeshua, not Jesus. Yet somehow in your food-starved brain of yours you came to the conclusion 'that there was no one named Jesus' and can't seem to understand this name-change has absolutely zero relevance to the historicity of the man people know as Jesus

For awhile, it seemed you were just a harmless twat that has some odd beliefs, now it appears to everyone that you are likely as crazy as George but only half as intelligent.
Click to expand...
Thepenofareadywriter;

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top