Al-Qaeda, Our Allies
- Thread starter budlover13
- Start date
echelon1k1
New Member
it's already starting...
White House National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden had this to say;
Hopefully congress will vote the way the Brits did...
And as usual Rumsfeld can't help but take a swipe at Iran, who are the country the US and her gulf allies would most like to topple...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
because you guys have such a long and storied track record of being right.
see president romney.
Oh, yes..pretend to know while you parrot your press outlet.ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
And other Pro Western Rebel groupsA military action in SUPPORT of Al-Qaeda and Al-Nusra. Just being clear on what's happening
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
In and out Just Like Libya.
There are boots on the ground already. SpecOps are for sure there. Unless they fuck up somewhere
You will never hear about it
And if this does go down
The truth about Benghazi will come out
GOD HERE
Well-Known Member
He's made some advances, but he's by no means "winning". Up until recently it looked like the rebels were going to smash his balls with a hammer. In regards to letting them kill each other, uh yeah, that's exactly what I'm proposing. There is no good side in this. The jihadis are animals, and Assad isn't far behind. I'm not suggesting refugee camps for the Syrians, I'm suggesting permanent resettlement, which is something that the U.N. is not only terrible at, but it doesn't seem to even cross their minds. There is no good solution to this conflict, and invasion I think for most reasonable people is off the table. This should've been quietly taken care of years ago, before the jihadis all got a hard on for the opportunity for another holy war in Syria.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
I called the election for Obama even though i preferred my toaster oven. My track record isn't bad.
The only thing you may have seen me say positive about Romney had a first name of George. I surely never claimed the stimulus was Bush's, that was your idiocy.
heckler73
Well-Known Member
It's probably because that little piece of paper Cameron was wielding as PROOF of Asshat's use of chemical weapons was weak (what was the source, again?).
And the Parliament doesn't have the same hard-on for blood-letting the way America's Death Cult reps (like John McCain) do.
In all seriousness, Buck, do you not perceive even the slightest hint of ulterior motives in this whole debacle re: America's Entrance? I can understand your sincere desire to see this merely be a case of "Asshat used CWs on his people", because the response would be just.
But in light of everything that has been discussed on these threads, do you not have an inkling of doubt?
That aside, I am interested to see what declassified information comes out this weekend from the CIA or whoever has this "evidence" (assuming they follow through with the reports I heard this morning).
If it's anything like the detailed analyses of IRAQ's chemical program in the 80s, it should be enlightening (while causing further questions for other reasons).
I expect to see Saudi Arabia discussed a great deal, as well...
But if it's like this dribble from the JIC, then something else is going on.
I'm not one for tin-foil vestments, but that whole "7 countries in 5 years" plan still seems to be in effect; the timeline was just extended.
Meanwhile, I just stumbled onto a report stating Asshat has lost control of Syria, and IRAN now controls 50% of it... according to Syrian Opposition
Now the BS is really starting to chug out of that region!
And English-style Thick-cut Potato Chips, will now be referred to as Liberation Wedges,
and English Muffins are now called Freedom Muffins.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i never claimed that either.
everyone else does, however. it is widely help knowledge that obama inherited a $1.5 trillion annual deficit, whether that makes your pussy ache or not.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
you are honest, intelligent and intuitive
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
What do you think of these supposed threats from Russia to attack Qatar and Saudi Arabia?It's probably because that little piece of paper Cameron was wielding as PROOF of Asshat's use of chemical weapons was weak (what was the source, again?).
And the Parliament doesn't have the same hard-on for blood-letting the way America's Death Cult reps (like John McCain) do.
In all seriousness, Buck, do you not perceive even the slightest hint of ulterior motives in this whole debacle re: America's Entrance? I can understand your sincere desire to see this merely be a case of "Asshat used CWs on his people", because the response would be just.
But in light of everything that has been discussed on these threads, do you not have an inkling of doubt?
That aside, I am interested to see what declassified information comes out this weekend from the CIA or whoever has this "evidence" (assuming they follow through with the reports I heard this morning).
If it's anything like the detailed analyses of IRAQ's chemical program in the 80s, it should be enlightening (while causing further questions for other reasons).
I expect to see Saudi Arabia discussed a great deal, as well...
But if it's like this dribble from the JIC, then something else is going on.
I'm not one for tin-foil vestments, but that whole "7 countries in 5 years" plan still seems to be in effect; the timeline was just extended.
Meanwhile, I just stumbled onto a report stating Asshat has lost control of Syria, and IRAN now controls 50% of it... according to Syrian Opposition
Now the BS is really starting to chug out of that region!
And English-style Thick-cut Potato Chips, will now be referred to as Liberation Wedges,
and English Muffins are now called Freedom Muffins.
heckler73
Well-Known Member
I have not heard that, but it wouldn't surprise me. This is part of the risk of America doing operations using "slam dunk" evidence. The probabilities of escalation increase.
http://www.eutimes.net/2013/08/putin-orders-massive-strike-against-saudi-arabia-if-west-attacks-syria/
I'm going to take that with a grain of salt, for now...
eche, just so we understand each other..i hate war and being world police..in this case 100k dead vis-a-vis chemical warfare on it's own people, also not cool..i think assad has something up his sleeve trying to draw us in with a heinous crime because he knows we will..i mean going by assad's statement above you have to ask yourself "why now"? obama is a thinker..shoots hoop and smokes weed..my money is still on the president, he knows what he's doing..imo
echelon1k1
New Member
100K dead from chemical agents? I don't think so that's a whole barrel of wrong...
You do have to ask yourself why now? there's enough info in this thread to connect the dots...
Shooting hoops and smoking weed is all he seems to do, if that... He's only as good as his last decision and when you don't attend your national security briefings and support terrorist groups there is something seriously wrong... open your eyes woman...
echelon1k1
New Member
UK wont be overtly supporting this quagmire...
100k is what's being reported..you know different?