abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
He doesn't just defer to advisers when he breaks his promises. He is furnished with impetus to do so by his detractors and by his "opponents" in congress. In short, they are in it together, everything is bipartisan, even the partisanship.''
I agree with you entirely. As with most presidents, Obama has found the burden far more annoying than reality--he has deferred to his advisors rather than making substantive policy changes relevant to the federal government.
When he went on a cannabis crackdown, some people defended him saying it was neocons in the DEA continuing the crackdown despite his promises. This works wonderfully for him, as he gets to be like Nixon, but is beloved like JFK. I call bullshit.
The fact is, the drug war is all his. He owns it, he inherited it and has ramped it up. He indicated that he would not, but when he did anyway, he just said that his promise was not to give carte blanch to a marijuana industry. He needs simply order Holder to reschedule, and this ongoing drama will end. The reason this debate continues, year after year, is because he is doing the opposite, and congress has increased his budget for the cannabis crackdown.
Now, I think he will also break his promise not to give carte blanch to an industry. There are people with ties to the democrat party and to media outlets friendly to the political position of said party who intend precisely a marijuana industry. They want to privatize marijuana and that is why Obama is keeping the crackdown going as long as he can with out losing political capital. This would all seem like a slippery slope, if not for the anti-marijuana group mentioned in the OP.
Privatization is not legalization. The whole point of prohibition was eventual privatization.