so that could be looked at as beneficial in that you might have a bit more predictability
or it could be looked at as a negative because you have less types of expression
If you are just chucking pollen, I think fems are a much better choice.
If you have
a lot of space
can grow out multiple males/females and save good genetics
want to back cross etc
then regs might be the better choice
with my 21 square feet of growing space, fems make the most sense for me
1. As soon as a female displays male flowers, it is by definition hermaphroditic.Colloidal silver and STS do not stress the plant. They make the plant produce the hormones that create male flowers in female plants. Using colloidal silver or STS is just taking advantage of a normal and natural aspect of cannabis.
Every female cannabis plant has the ability to produce male flowers. That does not make them hermaphrodites.
You do not understand the difference between monoecious and dioecious hermaphrodites. Stress is not passed down in DNA.
You do not understand the difference between monoecious and dioecious hermaphrodites.
Creating female seeds does not pass down any hermaphroditism.
If it is a female and shows male flowers, it is a monoecious hermaphrodite. It only has X chromosomes and can only produce female plants. It can not produce a male plant or a dioecious hermaphrodite as it lacks a Y chromosome...........1. As soon as a female displays male flowers, it is by definition hermaphroditic.
Monoecious hermaphroditism in female plants is a normal and natural survival mechanism. It is what I take advantage of to produce feminized seeds. There has not been one hermaphrodite or male from the feminized seeds I have made.2. Hermaphroditism in "regular" females is not normal or natural, it is an evolutionary survival mechanism.
The only difference is that it lacks a Y chromosome.3. Who says stress is passed down in DNA? The pollen from a hermaphroditic female is genetically different from the pollen of a normal male.
Some say cucumbers taste better pickled.4. Monoecious and dioecious hermaphrodites? In cannabis? A hermophrodite is by definition monoceious. It is you who does not understand.
You are wrong.5. Creating female seeds absolutely increases the percentage of hermaphrodites. See #2.
1. "It only has X chromosomes and can only produce female plants." 100% pure BS. It can also produce hermaphrodites as anyone who has germinated "feminized" seeds is well aware of. Furthermore, these hermaphrodites will frequently be what the Wikipedia article is referring to as "true hermaphrodites" although it is somewhat inaccurate to call them that as the cited source for "true hermaphrodites" (from 1950, no less) is undoubtedly referring to a dioceious (or "regular" if you prefer) population. I can't verify that as the link is dead, but a scientist in the fifties would be working from the standpoint that cannabis is substantially and most commonly a dioecious plant.If it is a female and shows male flowers, it is a monoecious hermaphrodite. It only has X chromosomes and can only produce female plants. It can not produce a male plant or a dioecious hermaphrodite as it lacks a Y chromosome.
Monoecious hermaphroditism in female plants is a normal and natural survival mechanism. It is what I take advantage of to produce feminized seeds. There has not been one hermaphrodite or male from the feminized seeds I have made.
The only difference is that it lacks a Y chromosome.
Although monoecious plants are often referred to as "hermaphrodites," true hermaphrodites (which are less common) bear staminate and pistillate structures on individual flowers
dude are you a cock, why are you being a cock, don't be a cock, that's not cool, not, being a cock for sure.. Such a cock. No reason to be such a cock1. "It only has X chromosomes and can only produce female plants." 100% pure BS. It can also produce hermaphrodites as anyone who has germinated "feminized" seeds is well aware of. Furthermore, these hermaphrodites will frequently be what the Wikipedia article is referring to as "true hermaphrodites" although it is somewhat inaccurate to call them that as the cited source for "true hermaphrodites" (from 1950, no less) is undoubtedly referring to a dioceious (or "regular" if you prefer) population. I can't verify that as the link is dead, but a scientist in the fifties would be working from the standpoint that cannabis is substantially and most commonly a dioecious plant.
Therefore, if "true hermaphrodites" are rare in the population of "regular" dioecious cannabis plants, it is clear that you are citing information in an effort to mislead people. End of argument for me. I encourage everyone reading this to do the research - well beyond what you are going to find in a Wikipedia article - and you will find that cannabis plants are very different from Gregor Mendel's pea plants. I firmly believe that "Trousers" has never done any serious research on the matter.
EDIT: Is that you subcool?
There is no need to be rude while you are being wrong.1. "It only has X chromosomes and can only produce female plants." 100% pure BS.
It can also produce hermaphrodites
Crappy growers stress plants and get monoecious hermaphrodites. They get the same from regular seeds.as anyone who has germinated "feminized" seeds is well aware of.
Furthermore, these hermaphrodites will frequently be what the Wikipedia article is referring to as "true hermaphrodites"
I am not sure what you are trying to say. Cannabis is a dioecious plant. It has males and females.although it is somewhat inaccurate to call them that as the cited source for "true hermaphrodites" (from 1950, no less) is undoubtedly referring to a dioceious (or "regular" if you prefer) population. I can't verify that as the link is dead, but a scientist in the fifties would be working from the standpoint that cannabis is substantially and most commonly a dioecious plant.
You are posting lies based on rumors from years ago. You misunderstand what is pretty common knowledge.Therefore, if "true hermaphrodites" are rare in the population of "regular" dioecious cannabis plants, it is clear that you are citing information in an effort to mislead people.
You have not offered anything to back up your lies.End of argument for me.
Pea plants are monoecious but the genetics work the same. If you have a logical or scientific problem with what I have posted, show me where I am wrong.I encourage everyone reading this to do the research - well beyond what you are going to find in a Wikipedia article - and you will find that cannabis plants are very different from Gregor Mendel's pea plants.
I do not need to, it is pretty much common sense and experience.I firmly believe that "Trousers" has never done any serious research on the matter.
Do some reading and quit spreading lies.EDIT: Is that you subcool?
Do you breed?There have been studies done on dioecious plants, not cannabis, that show that the DNA methylation is different in the two X chromosomes. That suggests one of the two X chromosomes is hypermethylated and inactive.
That makes sense. It does not limit the plant in that it is probably random which chromosome gets hypermethylated.
If that is true for cannabis, then feminized seeds would have less variation.
Yh mate it is obvious lol theres a guy on another forum tryin ta tell c/silver magically turns females to males without it bein a hermie lol