echelon1k1
New Member
You reap what you sow...what an articulate and substantive rebuttal.
thank you once again for your contribution.
You reap what you sow...what an articulate and substantive rebuttal.
thank you once again for your contribution.
nutritional deficiency certainly does effect brain function, as does a cultural imperative which holds education as being "too white" or "selling out"Who knew skin pigmentation had an effect on brain function.
that's just nonsense that white supremacists like to spew.a cultural imperative which holds education as being "too white"
memorizing the latest hot popular music chant is not education.that's just nonsense that white supremacists like to spew.
education is alive and well in black culture.
but you just want to appropriate education as being for whites.
not a racial stereotype at all.memorizing the latest hot popular music chant is not education.
could have something to do with the legacy of unequal access to opportunity over centuries, the relevant part in this case being the de facto segregation into the poorest neighborhoods (OMFG he said SES!).if education is so "alive and well" how do you explain the massive black drop out rates, the huge disparity in black vs EVERYBODY ELSE literacy rates?
not a racial stereotype at all.
could have something to do with the legacy of unequal access to opportunity over centuries, the relevant part in this case being the de facto segregation into the poorest neighborhoods (OMFG he said SES!).
i'm sure you will try to explain it all through melanin and rap music though. knock yourself out.
no, i am saying that the de facto segregation into the poorest neighborhoods makes it overall less likely that someone will receive the same education as someone who was born with more advantages in life.so, if my grandfather had a 4th grade education, that means i cannot succeed no matter how hard i might try, because my "SES" is a millstone around my neck, wow.
sounds like a theory that you or rushton would cook up.blacks are simply incapable of succeeding, and thus should be automatically assigned to menial labour...a perpetual underclass who can never rise above their base natures.
ya know i looked up phillipe rushton, and except for the "Usual Suspects", the Southern Poverty Law and Calling Everybody Racist Center, "Think Progress" and you, nobody else has shit on him for being "racist"no, i am saying that the de facto segregation into the poorest neighborhoods makes it overall less likely that someone will receive the same education as someone who was born with more advantages in life.
sounds like a theory that you or rushton would cook up.
OMFG.ya know i looked up phillipe rushton, and except for the "Usual Suspects", the Southern Poverty Law and Calling Everybody Racist Center, "Think Progress" and you, nobody else has shit on him for being "racist"
he wasnt drummed out of the pstchiatric societies of canada, the US or the UK, he wasnt rode out of town on a rail, and i found one "study" by an undergrad which challenged his methodologies.
Do actually know any minorities? How are you helping their SES? Charity, volunteering?OMFG.
there are no words.
he's doing the essential work of fabricating fraudulent quotations to defame anyone who disagrees with the leftist caste system's assessment of the negroe's utility.Do actually know any minorities? How are you helping their SES? Charity, volunteering?
so you never said anything about defending the REAL AMERICA (lol, nice try. we all know who you're talking about) from the multicultural wasteland of bullshit?he's doing the essential work of fabricating fraudulent quotations to defame anyone who disagrees with the leftist caste system's assessment of the negroe's utility.
ORLY?so you never said anything about defending the REAL AMERICA (lol, nice try. we all know who you're talking about) from the multicultural wasteland of bullshit?
i didn't alter a damn thing you said.ORLY?
anyone who wishes the context can read the linked source to my quote, gloriously free of edits redaction or alterations. i invite then to read it.
meanwhile your alleged phillipe rushton quote is 100% fraudulent.
if he ever said that i cannot find it, and a search for the quote comes up with only YOU as the source.
and of course, here is the non-existent, "fraudulent" rushton quote.lets all run away from the facts and truths exposed by the John Birch Society, and the wisdom of their founders and leaders. if we call them racist then we can burn them at the stake right? lets call them crazy too, then we can piss on the ashes! lets say they are conspiracy nuts, then we can put the piss soaked ashes into a lead lined urn and dispose of it with our spent nuclear fuel rods! Brilliant!
the John Birch Society has the desire to defend REAL AMERICA from the multicultural wasteland of bullshit, limp dicked liberals, and mindless drones of the leftist establishment. claiming the John Birch Society is made up of out of touch octogenarians with racist tendencies and a pathological fear of everything that they oppose is absolute crap. if the John Birch Society is wrong, then please explain:
the trilateral commission*
the council on foreign relations
the bildeberger group
the federal reserve's creation on jekyll island in georgia
the 1968 "crime bill" that banned sawed off shotguns, machine guns and grenades in response to the assasinations of JF and RF Kennedy, and mlk
legislation against thought and opinion (hate crime laws) rather than deeds.*
use of eminent domain to profit private interests
the new york times' "man in moskow" Walter Duranty selling stalin as the greatest leader since moses while he murdered half the nation.
chris "Tingles" mathews publicly admitting he gets thrill up hius leg every time he sees The Immaculate One
rachel maddow and ed schultz having "news and opinion" shows
"the young turks" who are even named after a genocidal marxist movement in the ottoman empire.*
all in all the John Birch Society has more shit right than they have wrong, and they have a way better track record than the new york times for truth, and are much more accepting of diverse opinions than the leftist press or leftists in general.*
slinging all this vitriol at the Koch family is unwarranted, and duplicitous when you realize it's coming from the same bunch who still applaud and revere henry kissinger and the rockerfellers
so youre CERTAIN Philipe J Rushton wrote that... absolutely certain.i didn't alter a damn thing you said.
and of course, here is the non-existent, "fraudulent" rushton quote.
http://preservingwesternciv.com/purpose.html
We believe that America’s Judeo-Christian heritage and European identity must be defended. Today, our glorious Western civilization is under assault from many directions. Three such threats will be discussed at this conference. First, the massive influx to the United States and Europe of Third-World immigrants who do not share our fundamental political and cultural values. Second, the threat from Islam, a militant ideology that is hostile to our society and, in principle, committed to destroying it. Third, because of the persistent disappointing performance of blacks (which many whites mistakenly blame on themselves) many whites have guilt feelings that undermine Western morale and deter us from dealing sensibly with the other threats.
yeah, it's not like rushton endorsed that statement of purpose in any way by SPEAKING AT THEIR LITTLE RACIST CONVENTION FOR RACISTS.so youre CERTAIN Philipe J Rushton wrote that... absolutely certain.
well youre LIAR it was written by a feller named Michael H Hart, as a mission statement for a symposium.
you are still a liar and still engaged in fraud.
further i in no way suggested you altered the quote you use from myself, and the original document remains for any who wish the context for your inflammatory snippet.
making that implication is just another of your many trademark deceptions
that was the statement of purpose for the gathering at which rushton spoke.Guilt by association now...