i told you obama is a retard...

[UncleBuck]

Hey folks, in case you haven't heard, the fed is going to drop cash on us from helicopters if it gets really bad. That way we can just buy our way back to prosperity.

mucho mucho respecto because you predicted it 100% accurately years in advance.

So rapid that a whole degree difference by 3010.

some respect diminished due to misrepresentation/understatement.

you called one thing way in advance though, whereas all other righties came nowhere respectably close.

 

[NoDrama]

mucho mucho respecto because you predicted it 100% accurately years in advance.



some respect diminished due to misrepresentation/understatement.

you called one thing way in advance though, whereas all other righties came nowhere respectably close.

I am not a believer in human caused global warming on the scale that it causes large disturbances in our climate, I think the sun is way more culpable than our insignificant actions. The sun, all by itself, can raise the temperature from 20 degrees to 60 degrees in only 6 or 8 hours. Man couldn't do that even if we unleashed every nuclear weapon on earth.

 

[Antidisestablishmentarian]

I find the 97% consensus hilarious.

97% of scientists who took a position on global warming say its man made.

Whereas the vast majority of all papers written on global warming state "We need more data!"

 

[ChesusRice]

I find the 97% consensus hilarious.

97% of scientists who took a position on global warming say its man made.

Whereas the vast majority of all papers written on global warming state "We need more data!"

Need more data= study it some more

 

[NoDrama]

Need more data= study it some more

I take it you still study the alphabet and the number system up to 10?

 

[beenthere]

I find the 97% consensus hilarious.

97% of scientists who took a position on global warming say its man made.

Whereas the vast majority of all papers written on global warming state "We need more data!"

Follow the money.

Scientists are going to protect their cash cow, if they admitted man made global warming research was flawed, the funding stops.
"we need more data" means we need more $$$.

 

[ChesusRice]

I take it you still study the alphabet and the number system up to 10?

Yes because climate change science is much simpler than the alphabet

 

[NoDrama]

Yes because climate change science is much simpler than the alphabet

So if all the climate scientists agree, why would there be any need to "Study it some more"? 100% of scientists agree that gravity exists, you don't see anyone studying it to see if it doesn't exist do you? Nope, the reason you would study it some more is because you aren't sure of your hypothesis.

You really suck ass at debate

 

[ChesusRice]

So if all the climate scientists agree, why would there be any need to "Study it some more"? 100% of scientists agree that gravity exists, you don't see anyone studying it to see if it doesn't exist do you? Nope, the reason you would study it some more is because you aren't sure of your hypothesis.

You really suck ass at debate

Oh really?
Scientists are not studying gravity anymore?

 

[NoDrama]

Oh really?
Scientists are not studying gravity anymore?

You can't read either can you? Go back and study the alphabet some more.

 

[ChesusRice]

You can't read either can you? Go back and study the alphabet some more.

But what if it’s all an illusion, a sort of cosmic frill, or a side effect of something else going on at deeper levels of reality? So says Erik Verlinde, 48, a respected string theorist and professor of physics at the University of Amsterdam, whose contention that gravity is indeed an illusion has caused a continuing ruckus among physicists, or at least among those who profess to understand it. Reversing the logic of 300 years of science, he argued in a recent paper, titled “On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton,” that gravity is a consequence of the venerable laws of thermodynamics, which describe the behavior of heat and gases.
“For me gravity doesn’t exist,” said Dr. Verlinde, who was recently in the United States to explain himself. Not that he can’t fall down, but Dr. Verlinde is among a number of physicists who say that science has been looking at gravity the wrong way and that there is something more basic, from which gravity “emerges,” the way stock markets emerge from the collective behavior of individual investors or that elasticity emerges from the mechanics of atoms.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/13/science/13gravity.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

 

[NoDrama]

But what if it’s all an illusion, a sort of cosmic frill, or a side effect of something else going on at deeper levels of reality? So says Erik Verlinde, 48, a respected string theorist and professor of physics at the University of Amsterdam, whose contention that gravity is indeed an illusion has caused a continuing ruckus among physicists, or at least among those who profess to understand it. Reversing the logic of 300 years of science, he argued in a recent paper, titled “On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton,” that gravity is a consequence of the venerable laws of thermodynamics, which describe the behavior of heat and gases.
“For me gravity doesn’t exist,” said Dr. Verlinde, who was recently in the United States to explain himself. Not that he can’t fall down, but Dr. Verlinde is among a number of physicists who say that science has been looking at gravity the wrong way and that there is something more basic, from which gravity “emerges,” the way stock markets emerge from the collective behavior of individual investors or that elasticity emerges from the mechanics of atoms.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/13/science/13gravity.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Well there ya go, gravity debunked and it no longer exists.

Either that or the play on words has "Confused" you, like that's anything new.

 

[UncleBuck]

the vast majority of all papers written on global warming state "We need more data!"

citation not needed because claim is demonstrably false.

Follow the money.

Scientists are going to protect their cash cow, if they admitted man made global warming research was flawed, the funding stops.
"we need more data" means we need more $$$.

yeah, tiny research stipends make the oil companies record profits pale in comparison.

lowly paid scientists versus the most profitable corporations in the history of the planet.

derp dee fucking der.

 

[SCARHOLE]

Obama just pushed back his last Obama care 1 mo
To just after Next yrs election.
So it will fail again just after the election

Dems even know know it s going to fail again or they wouldn't be doing this.

 

[NoDrama]

Obama just pushed back his last Obama care 1 mo
To just after Next yrs election.
So it will fail again just after the election

Dems even know know it s going to fail again or they wouldn't be doing this.

Nope, the law is the law, presidents don't get to change them on a whim.

All he can do is prevent federal agencies from conforming to the law, which opens up the government to a shit ton of lawsuits.

 

[heckler73]

Nope, the law is the law, presidents don't get to change them on a whim.

All he can do is prevent federal agencies from conforming to the law, which opens up the government to a shit ton of lawsuits.

What are Executive Orders?
Do those count as laws?

 

[UncleBuck]

Nope, the law is the law, presidents don't get to change them on a whim.

All he can do is prevent federal agencies from conforming to the law, which opens up the government to a shit ton of lawsuits.

ever heard of transitional authority, mr. derp?

 

[NoDrama]

ever heard of transitional authority, mr. derp?

No actually I haven't, have you? Perhaps you can send me a link that will educate me all about it?

 

[NoDrama]

What are Executive Orders?
Do those count as laws?

Executive orders are only for cabinet members or federal agencies that fall under the executive. Unless granted authority by Congress, executive orders have no authority over any thing else and are not laws.

 

[heckler73]

Executive orders are only for cabinet members or federal agencies that fall under the executive. Unless granted authority by Congress, executive orders have no authority over any thing else and are not laws.

Oh...so when Obama signed that NDAA (or whatever it was called), it was not "law"?
Strange...I also remember something about Bush "abusing" the executive order to set up something to the effect of making him "King" of the three branches of gov't.

But, that's one of those weird areas of American politics I've never really understood, so perhaps you are correct.