Fast-Food Workers Strike, Protest For Higher Pay

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
God damn I really hate to say this, but I agree with kynes and beenthere on this 1..
Of course the price of a big Mac is gonna go.up.if McDonald's are now forced to.double their employees salary.. it's very basic.. if McDonalds are now making x amount of.money per burger sold, which takes into account the price of the kangaroo meat, the bun, and special sauce, plus the $7 / hr the person flipping them gets paid, do you honestly think McDonalds will just now say, oh, OK, screw the bottom line and profits, we'll just eat that double salary cost and not pass it onto our customers? Fuck no, they're going to want to make the same amount of.money they are now, which the only way of.doing so would be to raise the cost of a Skippy Meal..
fixed that for ya



also, kangaroo is tasty as fuck.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
That was a bad word my friend but I fixed it for ya.
my apologies, i am using the dictionary definition.

wigger,*wigga*[ˈwɪgə]n*Slang*a white youth who adopts black youth culture by adopting its speech, wearing its clothes, and listening to its music[from a blend of*white*+*nigger]
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
:lol:
You're a wood-tick, not a burger flipper. I know for a fact the cost mechanics are vastly different in your sector because I've had to do "bids" myself (except with steel).
If you're as small a company as you imply, and you have competition, your contingency buffer is probably ~5% or else you're getting undercut by others.
And it would really suck if your competitors already have capital stock prior to bidding (assuming materials have a continuous inflation).
Then again, I can't profess knowledge of the intricacies in California construction, my experience is mostly in Western Canada and the contracts I dealt with dwarfed what you recently claimed as revenue (~$1Mn/yr?).
Perhaps you have different numbers to play with?
Please, tell me more...



You may be correct on the surface but you're neglecting one thing...profit margins.
McD's et al. have plenty of number-crunchers working for them figuring out the maximum prices they can charge the consumer in order to maintain those margins.
They currently have an average profit margin of ~20%.
Their labour costs are 17% of the operating budget...

To put that in perspective, if they charge $1.20 and it costs them $1, then 17 cents goes to labour.
DOUBLE the labour cost and the profit margin goes to 3 cents or ~2.5%, ceteris paribus.
Oh sure, shareholders who don't do fuck all as far as the company is concerned get hit on their divies (boo fucking hoo), but the company still has plenty of room to work, and that's assuming they don't raise prices modestly or squeeze their suppliers, ala WalFart, or utilize more capital instead of labour.

The places where you will see a negative effect is in SMEs. That will cause competition on the bleeding edge to get pushed out, but that leaves more business for the leftovers.
And once again, that is precluding aggregate demand effects...

I know I know... "Tarot reading" :lol:
PS Wood-tick is slang for carpenters.
i know a few burger franchisees, they pay more for labour than any other capital outlay. doubling their labour costs would slice their already thin margins to the bone, and in some regions, would drive them out of business.

McBurgers on the corner is NOT the McBurger Corporation Wall Street Ticker Symbol.

the franchisee doesnt have those kinds of margins, and cannot afford the doubling of their largest cost.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
i know a few burger franchisees, they pay more for labour than any other capital outlay. doubling their labour costs would slice their already thin margins to the bone, and in some regions, would drive them out of business.

McBurgers on the corner is NOT the McBurger Corporation Wall Street Ticker Symbol.

the franchisee doesnt have those kinds of margins, and cannot afford the doubling of their largest cost.

yet the mcdonald's that was there when reagan sat and watched the minimum wage become effectively smaller is still there after minimum wage has more than doubled since he left office.

all this goddamn empirical evidence and these concrete, real world examples getting in the way of your repeated and demonstrable right wing, bircher lies.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
LOL... We got a law and order cast member in the house :dunce:
i woulkd say "Depraved Indifference" is more accurate.

2nd Degree Racism is the best they can get you on, but i bet you can plea bargain it down to Negligent Racism and get off with community service and time served...
 

travisw

Well-Known Member
i know a few burger franchisees, they pay more for labour than any other capital outlay. doubling their labour costs would slice their already thin margins to the bone, and in some regions, would drive them out of business.

McBurgers on the corner is NOT the McBurger Corporation Wall Street Ticker Symbol.

the franchisee doesnt have those kinds of margins, and cannot afford the doubling of their largest cost.
I read something that estimated the cost at around 26%. Does that sound about right?
 

echelon1k1

New Member
i woulkd say "Depraved Indifference" is more accurate.

2nd Degree Racism is the best they can get you on, but i bet you can plea bargain it down to Negligent Racism and get off with community service and time served...
Dude, just think if it was the Law and Order guys prosecuting Zimmerman? Lefty love boners all round...

just on the down low - you better fix those spelling errors before see4 goes all grammar nazi on you ;-)
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
...as far as I know Duke is not personally linked to any murders...
so david duke gets a pass for his racism, but sharpton gets hung by the toenails for his.

about what i would expect from someone like you who knowingly joined white supremacy groups.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member




2000: federal minimum wage is $5.15
2010: federal minimum wage is $7.25

that is an increase in the minimum wage of 140%.

did the big mac go up in price by 140% as well? adjusted for inflation, nope. it went up 126%.

wages went up, the price of food did not soar, and the same dollar would buy you more after the wage increase than it did before.

i will say it over and over and over again: the right does not have one single concrete example that supports their moronic yelling and blathering.

since they have no concrete examples and thus no actual reason to oppose this, they will invent a lie and keep repeating it: class warfare.

the right in america is fucking hopeless.

This is my favorite of all time!

What inflation??

Then in small words below the 2000 price it says that the prices have been adjusted for inflation.


If there was no inflation there would be no need to adjust for it.

Edit, also $5.15 to $7.25 is a 41% increase NOT 140%

Math. You can't do it.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Dude, i'm not even australian
cat's outa the bag homey.

it's true, me and echie are a couple African American Rump Rangers, tooling the mean streets looking for confused young men to seduce to the Darkest (and most fabulous) Side of the Force.

dont fight it my Chocolate Adonis, our Rock Hard Abdominals gave us away, plus i kept saying put the earring in your LEFT ear, thats a dead giveaway sugar.

Ooooh! we gotta run, Project Runway is starting on Bravo!
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
This is my favorite of all time!

What inflation??

Then in small words below the 2000 price it says that the prices have been adjusted for inflation.


If there was no inflation there would be no need to adjust for it.
 
Top