UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
See, I don't find this insulting or demeaning at all. Simply someones interpretation of the book. And also some pretty good points on sex.
"Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there. Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men," he tells reporter Drew Magary. "Don't be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers—they won't inherit the kingdom of God. Don't deceive yourself. It's not right."
He also muses about his own sexual orientation: "It seems like, to me, a vagina—as a man—would be more desirable than a man's anus. That's just me. I'm just thinking: There's more there! She’s got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I'm saying? But hey, sin: It's not logical, my man. It's just not logical."
sometimes, i put my erect penis between my wife's large tits and thrust until i spray semen all over her neck and chest. what's logical about that?
i would be very offended if someone compared me to a drunk thief who fucks goats because of how my partner and i bring each other's genitals to orgasmic wonder in the privacy of our own bedroom.
sounds like phil is just harboring a hateful grudge.