Doer

I like that, ...all myth describes Self? Is that it?

...starting to think so

"self to self dialogue" - I wrote at a high-philosophy site that "I'm starting to think that all myth is describing the same individual".

...funny you should add this. I was thinking recently "what if this is my afterlife". What if this is heaven or hell, depending on my state of mind last time I left here. Awake in the dream?

...I think in a way I am saying that we 'are' the meaning. Likely one of the reasons it is deemed wise to calm the ego and 'see' with real, and not borrowed, light

...I do pick up golf clubs (have bent golf clubs - but with a tree and not my mind ) (I kid)

...I will have a look at that So, could it be said that we make it happen with meaning?

...I think, also, that we're talking about the same thing. When I say the line is blurred, I mean that I feel as though I am a part of what I see around me in a more intimate sense. I guess this could all go back to the 'word'. That 'creative potential'.

...in the world but not of it. (we noted that here before) To learn 'how' to be in it, first observe how we 'are' in it. So my consciousness watches the reel, does not participate in a logos sense. Rather, it is put to the stage while eros sensibility 'accepts' it. Be the scribe and jott it down without influencing it. That's what I was meaning to say 'Interiority' and 'diamond in the rough' are analogous to me. It is a chance to 'be' that diamond, which hopefully extends to the world around it?

...I'll be honest. The line between creation and co-creation seems a little blurred atm. I was reading just last night about 'interiority'. The idea of watching the inner reel, allowing myself to be the 'other' part(y) of a given inner 'stage'. I would be observing 'that me' as it interacts with whatever is on that inner stage. *shakes head*

...I can see a lot of what it has done. Really incredible stuff. Hard to believe that people can do that!

...thanks! I think that is what I was getting at in the email. It would be beyond our capacity to 'use'. In a sense, I can envision that being almost tower of babylon-ish. Sorry for the stretching

Hey Doer! I was just reading your thread about earth based storage. I don't think we've talked about that before. I'm trying to see if we did. Reason is, I had sent an email to 2 friends (the only 2 friends I could send something like 'that' to), the email was about '64 and limitations in computing'. I somehow thought that dna / combinations / iching (hexagrams) had something to do with it. Know what? This time I'm half freaked out Or, I should just accept that I don't 'know' about these things but might have inclinations about them that are helpful to someone else (?). Maybe that made some sense? I hope it did.

...not to mention that fact that I consider you a friend here.

Hey man, I'm curious if you wrote the 'support' comment because I chimed in for Kaendar's post? I've been accused too many times of being unintelligible so I felt I should post.

Did I read that right?

...hey man, I'm not sure but did you post your 'sailing' in response to the oil and water conversation? If so, I just got it now when I came to your message board.

When we do big sailing we carry canvas bags for the purpose. Sometimes you just have to lie ahull, no sails and just get blown downwind. It helps to have to the bags rigged along the weather side. Not much water will come aboard if you got a slick on that side. It really does work.

...one day I wrote that very thing down on a piece of paper, just on a whim "the universe is oil and water". I don't know exactly why I write these things, but somewhere down the line they tend to start making some sense to me. Or at least become a part of speculation and conversation. Odd too that catholics have oil smudged on them at baptism - along with that bath

...it starts to look a little more balanced in there I won't hold my breath on it becoming a trend though

...and you know, now that I've briefed the Everett Interpretation, seems a lot like the 'many chances' that a God would give. *nods profusely*

...I feel that Christ was correct to say that we are the top of the tree. The 'perception is conception' idea I am starting to grasp. It is as though our thoughts are the same as the 'life juice' that create people? And, maybe not being omega is good, I think. Otherwise, we might be 'in the beyond', right?

"misty math for certainty, and logic against conformity - just another tower, with charges set"

...science is as mystical as mysticism And I don't see many angels here on the forum