Search results

I'm talking about the brand of anti-zionism which leads you to post smoloko.com memes, a site that when you open the homepage says "maybe Hitler was right." That's just fucked up.

But anti-zionism isn't paranoia? Get a grip on reality!

lol This is you beginning to backpedal. You defend smoloko.com, you post their memes, you are a dumb fucking sheep with so little self esteem. Just do it.

Absolute moronic trash, can't even remember what he posted 10 days ago.

Are you defending Smoloko.com now? You have incorrectly conflated your anti-Zionist NWO conspiracy bullshit with the legitimate reasoning of the actual Zionist movement.

Just 3 pages back. and more of your inferiority complex:

You are brainwashed by smoloko.com, a fascist nazi-defending site for retards with no hope but to blame Jews. You are unworthy of life, a total disgrace.

Why don't you tell us then? What's it like to feel so inferior to Jews that you turn into a fascist piece of shit that supports genocide against the people he feels inferior to?

You are exactly as smart as a retarded racist nazi piece of shit.

Smoloko.com

Or maybe they will move there to live in a city without huge disparity, high crime rates, and crumbling roads and bridges. Eradicating poverty is in the interest of the well off. It improves the quality of our lives and increases our safety.

Loads of bad info, you mean. Try fact checking and looking into the so called "experts" that are actually usually fringe nuts with no real credentials. Truther nonsense is debunked. And no, Paul isn't dead. Ask people what reliable sources are on subjects, real publications that get reviewed...

How is great news to disrupt and separate families? Is that what family values look like? How is it great news to trample states' rights to govern themselves peacefully and protect the interests of the members of their communities? Is that what state rights look like? Keep oppressing that...

No, only you are the fool for not being able to admit you are wrong that homosexuality itself isn't dangerous or the risk factor for contracting HIV. Even the author of that study went on record saying that anti-LGBT groups like FRC were wrong to use the study to make that inference. You would...

That's like saying the sky is blue because my car is red. Look up causation vs correlation. Being homosexual isn't more dangerous, having sex with many people is. A person that is homosexual and only has sex with one person their entire life is just as safe as a heterosexual. Homosexuality is...

No it's not. Instead of proclaiming victory without a rebuttal, why don't you revisit every argument I made? What does the number of sexual partners have to do with homosexuality being harmful? You are comitting the logical fallacy by equating homosexuality with having multiple sexual partners...

Unprotected sexual activities includes heterosexuals. If it is just as risky for heterosexuals to have unprotected sex as it is for homosexuals, what make homosexuality worse? Faulty argument.

They are a hate group by their actions, FRC claiming to love gays after they use false information to demonize gays is laughable. Regardless, I still took on your sources claims. Go ahead and try to disprove SPL's claims, but you won't because you know you can't. FRC is using old, debunked...

So some gays have more unprotected sex and more sexual partners, at best that is indirectly correlated to homosexuality and moreso correlated to other behavioral choices. Homosexuality is not the cause.

https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2011/10-anti-gay-myths-debunked