Search results

Okay...so PLEASE post the TEXT FROM THE BILL that clearly presents evidence supporting your claim.

But doesn't that just confuse the point he is making? Since there won't be any cooperation with Russia... Bad news if you have a dilapidated navy like Russia, or are unable to project any power (china, Iran, North Korea...) Too bad...too bad. Strategically, they are all completely...

So...if you read the bill you would have seen... Like what's in the bill, and I have repeated numerous times here: If you are NOT a member of Al Qaeda, and live IN the US, this bill does not apply to you, and it CANNOT apply to you. However, if you are a terrorist, living outside the...

Since when are you the enforcer of etiquette? Did I miss something?

Umm...Hezbollah? Manipulating the people (Palestinian, Lebanese, etc) by a terrorist proxy, and yet staunchly opposing a peace process that would totally remove the manipulated partys' reason for even cooperating is a great place to start. It's kind of messed up to say "hey, were with you in...

I'm glad we have so many well-informed Iran-sympathists here...it's too bad that even native-born Iranian people don't share the ignorant and un-informed beliefs held by some here. If you think that Iran has essentially "done nothing wrong" or "not attacked anyone" you are flat out wrong. All...

This has nothing to do with "dissent," you keep brining in terminology that doesn't apply to the Bill in an attempt to distort the issue. I have posted numerous places now what the EXACT wording of the bill is, and you must either be ignoring reality, or just of poor comprehension - because it...

So...Gingrich?

If they are committing these acts within the US, they are entitled to all rights and privileges afforded by the US Constitution.

He has been on fox a crazy amount of air time, i think he is third, behind cain and bachmann.

No federal terrorism unit is going to concern themselves with small growers. Ever. Local LEA's...of course, they love attention and headlines.

That's a good quote though...thanks. I especially like the last sentence...

I thought I was on your ignore list, Sylvan? No one should be ashamed of the views they hold.

Yeah, and as was pointed out today, the Iowa caucus is a collection of activists...it's not a primary.

No, it does not.

Thanks for revisiting the point at which your "plan" becomes totally ill-conceived, to which you have no other recourse except insults.

They don't exist in the bill, so why be against the bill that isn't part of the problem? Be against other legislation, not this bill which has nothing to do with statements made by those in the vid you linked.

The bill doesn't even include those words, so it's pointless to bring them into a discussion concerning the ACTUAL bill. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c112:5:./temp/~c112r6Mbna:e578060:

No it doesn't, not at all...You are dead wrong.

So, rhetorical expounding somehow trumps the actual text?