Search results

If what we saw in Boston last week was criminal, and not military enforcement, why? Your communities are all covered with swat teams and armor. I'm betting this kid gets his day in court and fries. Sounds like criminal judgment to me, and those courts will prove entirely capable.

And lest we forget: cannabando (kn--bnd) n. pl. cannabandos or cannabandoes 1. An elite resident of the State of Michigan who qualifies to use cannabis for medically necessary purposes, but declines the limited protections afforded in §4 of The Michigan Medical Marihuana Act, and instead...

Sry buck. It was not at first clear that you were talking about someone else. Now that I know the source, I find it curious that a mod at 3ma, and who was in on the conversation prohibiting the discussion of sec. 8, is obviously not in compliance with sec. 4 and therefore must use the AD if and...

Please be careful with what you post buck. We don't want to see you step on your dick. Sure we can discuss it. What appears here was posted on the site and is in he public domain. it is attributed to Kormon, who wrote it, so there is no infraction of any rule or law. The admin, mods, and...

By the above twisted and fucked up facts, we are all in violation of sec. 4 from the instant we cut our plants to the time they are rendered into usable marijuana, despite being otherwise compliant with section 4 requirements. Because they are not plants or usable product, by the definition...

Got it. Thanks.

No joy. None seen.

Where in fuck is the ignore option?

The following is an interesting case study in bringing the AD. Kormon has a firm grasp of the law and gets Jeff off the hook after years of litigation. Interesting is that he has included more informal conversation between himself and the prosecution. It is a long read, but essential, I think...

You're a one trick pony. We do not disagree that there are substantial risks. I have been more than clear. You are bringing nothing new. We will have this conversation. Because you have nothing new, I have no more reason to respond.

These are what we are prohibited from under sec. 8. Sec.7(b) This act shall not permit any person to do any of the following: (1) Undertake any task under the influence of marihuana, when doing so would constitute negligence or professional malpractice. (2) Possess marihuana, or otherwise...

Are you suggesting, Townsend, that a person must be registered before they can use the AD? Are you saying that a five pound batch of brownies is not defensible? Throughout I have come back repeatedly to the risks involved, just as I stated in that first post, and will continue to as the...

Soooo. What are the rules of evidence and how do they play?

Yah. We know.

Something important is that we discuss rules of evidence in bringing a sec. 8 defense. What is necessary, what works, and what schemes do prosecutors play in challenging them? How do a judge's attitudes play? Townsend touched on them with his remark about paid witnesses. For instance, the 2.5...

The point is not so much that he might not be a doctor, but a curricula vitae spells out, in detail, educational, professional, and sometimes personal accomplishments. It could be his training came from some diploma mill. Without verification, we cannot know. Is there something there to be...

I'm outa town taking care of other business, tyvm.

That is the kind of contribution we look for, and that this discussion is intended to clarify. Was that so hard?

Will you please cite any attorney statements to back you up? Professionals in good standing are typically glad to share their CV. You are a liar. We are patients. You profess to being a physician. You spam boards with your business. You argue as if you think you are an authority. We should not...

The CV Bob. Is it an embarrassment? You would have discussion censored, preventing brainstorming that can help those guys. Of course. Your expert witness fees are at risk. The more we know, the less you can bill for. Despite that, there will still be work.