Search results

So your policy is that Christians should be able to conquer and rape but that when Christians do it its not really happening? See how that works? I can do it too. Makes it no more valid then when you do. Save that circular argument, tautology shit for bible school At this rate you should go...

If simply being stated, verified by statistical proof? No. If said as pretense for discriminatory policy....as contextually shown through the show of support for said discriminatory policy in this conversation. Then Yes.

dude...if you aren't capable of a back and forth just stop... You're racist. We get it. Stop trying so hard to pretend there's more to it.

are you having fun making your own little side argument? Cause we've all moved onto what it means and why it matters. Try and keep up

Do you even hear yourself? Funny, that's how most druidic settlers in Jordon feel about Americans because of U.S. soldiers. Funny how people with no firsthand experience with another culture use popular opinion to validate generalized personal bias.

Well Id say your on the right track on that one. Couldn't agree more that general education has got to be one of the first steps for the Middle East

The only way that tactic has work throughout history is to kill a whole peoples and burn their books leaving nothing left. I believe Hitler was the last guy to give that a serious go. ....Maybe Rwanda? Or Burma?...meh...im sure im forgetting a few....point is it hasn't worked.

So your answer is to go with a guy that gives you an oversimplified answer to your problem that doesn't SOLVE said problem but allows you to continue ignoring the underlining CAUSES of the problem and go back to watching American bandstand (or its current equivalent). Fucking GENIUS...

Well I certainly agree with you that those who claim to be of a denomination yet dont follow its teaching are full of shit and kidding themselves. Also that spiritual teaching can show 1 alot if they know how to look.

Would you be polling a equal number of Muslims? Or just Christians? And can people check "both"?

well....really I suppose I was asking if you were able to speak to folks here that clearly dont share your religious beliefs ABOUT your religion in a way that both explained your dogma (which I like to hear about by the way) but wasn't confrontational to the point of leaving no room for the...

What are you relying on to make that claim? have you BEEN "over there"? I have...at length. Your description was not my experience.

I am not qualified to judge what others believe. I can only apply empirical evidence to claims made to me in an attempt to decide whats true for me.

Plz dont take this as a criticism (its not)...but Are you refering to your points as dogmatic fact (as in its true by the doctrine of the faith im referencing)? or that it is a universal truth? with the understanding that true for you may not be true for folks of other faith/belief systems you...

But you agree that there are peoples of differing denominations whom live by different ideals, yes? And that a percentage of the people from all these different spheres are violent; a percentage of those being violent in the name of their given faith, yes? This is not news to anyone. Nor is it...

ahhh....I hear what your laying down. Im not sure it makes any difference to my point that regardless of teachings Christians commit violence in its name just like other faiths do. But I see the distinction your making. Although SamsonsRiddle is making some good points to the contrary of your...

How so exactly?

Lord Kanti has been dry humping that 1 for days. While jesus hasnt ordered violence, christianities god certainly has....and regardless of either it certainly hasnt stopped christians from commiting it. So whats the distinction matter?

Yes...using analogy IS a tried and true method of speaking sideways thus never being able to be pinned down on a specific definition when it suits you. Do you want a cookie?

I agree. But for that to work one must know how empirical evidence works in relation to verifying if something is a fact in the first place. As opposed to simply citing something thats been stated and using it to validate a veiwpoint, regardless of if it proves said veiwpoint.